Maxwell Kelley
Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Maxwell Kelley.
Climate Dynamics | 2007
James E. Hansen; Makiko Sato; Reto Ruedy; Pushker A. Kharecha; Andrew A. Lacis; Ron L. Miller; Larissa Nazarenko; K. Lo; Gavin A. Schmidt; Gary L. Russell; Igor Aleinov; Susanne E. Bauer; E. Baum; Brian Cairns; V. M. Canuto; Mark A. Chandler; Y. Cheng; Armond Cohen; A. D. Del Genio; G. Faluvegi; Eric L. Fleming; Andrew D. Friend; Timothy M. Hall; Charles H. Jackman; Jeffrey Jonas; Maxwell Kelley; Nancy Y. Kiang; D. Koch; Gordon Labow; J. Lerner
We carry out climate simulations for 1880–2003 with GISS modelE driven by ten measured or estimated climate forcings. An ensemble of climate model runs is carried out for each forcing acting individually and for all forcing mechanisms acting together. We compare side-by-side simulated climate change for each forcing, all forcings, observations, unforced variability among model ensemble members, and, if available, observed variability. Discrepancies between observations and simulations with all forcings are due to model deficiencies, inaccurate or incomplete forcings, and imperfect observations. Although there are notable discrepancies between model and observations, the fidelity is sufficient to encourage use of the model for simulations of future climate change. By using a fixed well-documented model and accurately defining the 1880–2003 forcings, we aim to provide a benchmark against which the effect of improvements in the model, climate forcings, and observations can be tested. Principal model deficiencies include unrealistically weak tropical El Nino-like variability and a poor distribution of sea ice, with too much sea ice in the Northern Hemisphere and too little in the Southern Hemisphere. Greatest uncertainties in the forcings are the temporal and spatial variations of anthropogenic aerosols and their indirect effects on clouds.
Journal of Climate | 2012
Daehyun Kim; Adam H. Sobel; Anthony D. Del Genio; Yonghua Chen; Suzana J. Camargo; Mao-Sung Yao; Maxwell Kelley; Larissa Nazarenko
The tropical subseasonal variability simulated by the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model, Model E2, is examined. Several versions of Model E2 were developed with changes to the convective parameterization in order to improve the simulation of the Madden‐Julian oscillation (MJO). When the convective scheme is modified to have a greater fractional entrainment rate, Model E2 is able to simulate MJO-like disturbances with proper spatial and temporal scales. Increasing the rate of rain reevaporation has additionalpositive impacts on the simulated MJO. The improvement in MJO simulation comes at the cost of increased biases in the mean state, consistent in structure and amplitude with those found in other GCMs when tuned to have a stronger MJO. By reinitializing a relatively poor-MJO version with restart files from a relatively better-MJO version, a series of 30-day integrations is constructed to examine the impacts of the parameterization changes on the organization of tropical convection. The poor-MJO version with smaller entrainment rate has a tendency to allow convection to be activated over a broader area and to reduce the contrast between dry and wet regimes so that tropical convection becomes less organized. Besides the MJO, the number of tropical-cyclone-like vortices simulated by the model is also affected by changes in the convectionscheme.Themodelsimulatesasmallernumberof suchstormsgloballywithalargerentrainmentrate, while the number increases significantly with a greater rain reevaporation rate.
Climate Dynamics | 2015
John Marshall; Jeffery R. Scott; Kyle C. Armour; J.-M. Campin; Maxwell Kelley; Anastasia Romanou
We study the role of the ocean in setting the patterns and timescale of the transient response of the climate to anthropogenic greenhouse gas forcing. A novel framework is set out which involves integration of an ocean-only model in which the anthropogenic temperature signal is forced from the surface by anomalous downwelling heat fluxes and damped at a rate controlled by a ‘climate feedback’ parameter. We observe a broad correspondence between the evolution of the anthropogenic temperature (
Geophysical Research Letters | 2015
M. J. Way; Anthony D. Del Genio; Nancy Y. Kiang; Linda E. Sohl; David H. Grinspoon; Igor Aleinov; Maxwell Kelley; Thomas L. Clune
Geophysical Research Letters | 2012
Benjamin I. Cook; Jed O. Kaplan; M. J. Puma; Maxwell Kelley; D. Gueyffier
T_{anthro}
Geophysical Research Letters | 2015
Robert Pincus; Eli J. Mlawer; Lazaros Oreopoulos; Andrew S. Ackerman; Sunghye Baek; Manfred Brath; Stefan Buehler; Karen E. Cady-Pereira; Jason N. S. Cole; Jean Louis Dufresne; Maxwell Kelley; Jiangnan Li; James Manners; David Paynter; Romain Roehrig; Miho Sekiguchi; Daniel M. Schwarzkopf
Journal of Climate | 2011
Marvin A. Geller; Tiehan Zhou; Reto Ruedy; Igor Aleinov; Larissa Nazarenko; N. Tausnev; S. Sun; Maxwell Kelley; Y. Cheng
Tanthro) in our simplified ocean-only model and that of coupled climate models perturbed by a quadrupling of
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems | 2016
Felix Pithan; Andrew S. Ackerman; Wayne M. Angevine; Kerstin Hartung; Luisa Ickes; Maxwell Kelley; Brian Medeiros; Irina Sandu; G.J. Steeneveld; H.A.M. Sterk; Gunilla Svensson; Paul A. Vaillancourt; Ayrton Zadra
Geophysical Research Letters | 2014
Robert D. Field; Daehyun Kim; Allegra N. LeGrande; John R. Worden; Maxwell Kelley; Gavin A. Schmidt
\hbox {CO}_{2}
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2017
M. J. Way; Igor Aleinov; David S. Amundsen; Mark A. Chandler; Thomas L. Clune; A. D. Del Genio; Y. Fujii; Maxwell Kelley; Nancy Y. Kiang; Linda E. Sohl; Kostas Tsigaridis