Meagan A. Ramsey

AGE DIFFERENCES IN SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING ACROSS ADULTHOOD: THE ROLES OF SAVORING AND FUTURE TIME PERSPECTIVE

Prior research indicates there are age differences in subjective well-being during adulthood, but research on age differences in savoring (up-regulating positive emotion) is lacking. Using an online survey (N = 218, adults 18–77), this study investigated age differences in subjective well-being and savoring, and whether future time perspective (perceived amount of time left to live) mediated associations between age and savoring. Results indicated a nonlinear effect of age on subjective well-being. Although savoring was associated with subjective well-being, age was not directly associated with savoring. However, an indirect effect of future time perspective linking age and savoring indicated that younger adults reported more perceived time left in life and those perceiving more time left in life reported greater savoring. Overall, the results do not support savoring as a direct explanatory mechanism for age differences in subjective well-being, but future time perspective appears to play an important role in indirect associations between age and savoring.

Young adolescents’ emotional and regulatory responses to positive life events: Investigating temperament, attachment, and event characteristics

Very little is known about what factors predict variations in responses to positive events among youth. Consequently, we examined young adolescents’ positive emotional reactions and their savoring and dampening responses to their most intense positive event across a four-day period. The investigated predictors were parent-reported adolescent temperament, adolescent-reported attachment security with mothers and fathers, and researcher-coded event characteristics. The sample was 56 youth (31 boys, 10–14 years of age). More support was found for temperament than attachment. Specifically, effortful control predicted more savoring and sustained positive affect (PA) about the events, whereas negative emotionality predicted more dampening. Adolescents’ reports of more secure attachment to fathers were marginally linked to more savoring of their positive event. Girls reported higher levels of initial PA yet endorsed more dampening responses than boys. Event type (interpersonal vs. not) was unrelated to responses to the events. Overall, this study offers new information on the development of PA regulation and responses to positive events in youth.

Mothers’ attachment styles and their children’s self-reported security, as related to maternal socialization of children’s positive affect regulation

This study investigated how mothers’ attachment was related to their responses to their own and their children’s positive events and positive affect (PA). Ninety-seven mothers reported on their attachment and their responses to their own and their 7–12-year-old children’s positive events and emotions. Children reported on their mothers’ responses to the children’s positive events and their attachment security with their mothers. The results indicated that more avoidant mothers reported less intense PA in response to their own and their children’s positive events. More avoidant mothers also were less likely to encourage their children to savor positive events (through expressing PA, reflecting on PA or themselves, giving rewards, and affectionate responses). Mothers higher on anxiety reported greater likelihood of dampening (e.g., minimizing the event’s importance) their own positive events and reported being more likely to feel discomfort and to reprimand their children for expressing PA. Children’s security was predicted by mothers’ lower likelihood of encouraging children’s dampening and of reprimanding children for PA displays. This study advances the literature on how mothers’ attachment is related to the ways in which they regulate their own and their children’s PA, which may have implications for children’s attachment and developing PA regulation.