Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Øivind Hodnebrog is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Øivind Hodnebrog.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2016

Fast and Slow Precipitation Responses to Individual Climate Forcers: A PDRMIP Multimodel Study

Bjørn H. Samset; Gunnar Myhre; Piers M. Forster; Øivind Hodnebrog; Timothy Andrews; G. Faluvegi; D. Fläschner; M. Kasoar; Viatcheslav V. Kharin; A. Kirkevåg; Jean-Francois Lamarque; D. Olivié; Thomas Richardson; Drew T. Shindell; Keith P. Shine; Toshihiko Takemura; Apostolos Voulgarakis

Precipitation is expected to respond differently to various drivers of anthropogenic climate change. We present the first results from the Precipitation Driver and Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP), where nine global climate models have perturbed CO2, CH4, black carbon, sulfate, and solar insolation. We divide the resulting changes to global mean and regional precipitation into fast responses that scale with changes in atmospheric absorption and slow responses scaling with surface temperature change. While the overall features are broadly similar between models, we find significant regional intermodel variability, especially over land. Black carbon stands out as a component that may cause significant model diversity in predicted precipitation change. Processes linked to atmospheric absorption are less consistently modeled than those linked to top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing. We identify a number of land regions where the model ensemble consistently predicts that fast precipitation responses to climate perturbations dominate over the slow, temperature-driven responses.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2017

PDRMIP: A Precipitation Driver and Response Model Intercomparison Project—Protocol and Preliminary Results

Gunnar Myhre; Piers M. Forster; Bjørn H. Samset; Øivind Hodnebrog; Jana Sillmann; Siv G. Aalbergsjø; Timothy Andrews; Olivier Boucher; G. Faluvegi; D. Fläschner; Trond Iversen; M. Kasoar; Viatcheslav V. Kharin; A. Kirkevåg; Jean-Francois Lamarque; D. Olivié; Thomas Richardson; Drew T. Shindell; Keith P. Shine; Camilla Weum Stjern; Toshihiko Takemura; Apostolos Voulgarakis; Francis W. Zwiers

As the global temperature increases with changing climate, precipitation rates and patterns are affected through a wide range of physical mechanisms. The globally averaged intensity of extreme precipitation also changes more rapidly than the globally averaged precipitation rate. While some aspects of the regional variation in precipitation predicted by climate models appear robust, there is still a large degree of inter-model differences unaccounted for. Individual drivers of climate change initially alter the energy budget of the atmosphere leading to distinct rapid adjustments involving changes in precipitation. Differences in how these rapid adjustment processes manifest themselves within models are likely to explain a large fraction of the present model spread and needs better quantifications to improve precipitation predictions. Here, we introduce the Precipitation Driver and Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP), where a set of idealized experiments designed to understand the role of different climate forcing mechanisms were performed by a large set of climate models. PDRMIP focuses on understanding how precipitation changes relating to rapid adjustments and slower responses to climate forcings are represented across models. Initial results show that rapid adjustments account for large regional differences in hydrological sensitivity across multiple drivers. The PDRMIP results are expected to dramatically improve our understanding of the causes of the present diversity in future climate projections.


Nature Communications | 2016

Local biomass burning is a dominant cause of the observed precipitation reduction in southern Africa

Øivind Hodnebrog; Gunnar Myhre; Piers M. Forster; Jana Sillmann; Bjørn H. Samset

Observations indicate a precipitation decline over large parts of southern Africa since the 1950s. Concurrently, atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols have increased due to anthropogenic activities. Here we show that local black carbon and organic carbon aerosol emissions from biomass burning activities are a main cause of the observed decline in southern African dry season precipitation over the last century. Near the main biomass burning regions, global and regional modelling indicates precipitation decreases of 20–30%, with large spatial variability. Increasing global CO2 concentrations further contribute to precipitation reductions, somewhat less in magnitude but covering a larger area. Whereas precipitation changes from increased CO2 are driven by large-scale circulation changes, the increase in biomass burning aerosols causes local drying of the atmosphere. This study illustrates that reducing local biomass burning aerosol emissions may be a useful way to mitigate reduced rainfall in the region.


Environmental Science & Technology | 2014

Climate penalty for shifting shipping to the Arctic.

Jan S. Fuglestvedt; Stig B. Dalsøren; Bjørn H. Samset; Terje K. Berntsen; Gunnar Myhre; Øivind Hodnebrog; Magnus S. Eide; Trond Flisnes Bergh

The changing climate in the Arctic opens new shipping routes. A shift to shorter Arctic transit will, however, incur a climate penalty over the first one and a half centuries. We investigate the net climate effect of diverting a segment of Europe-Asia container traffic from the Suez to an Arctic transit route. We find an initial net warming for the first one-and-a-half centuries, which gradually declines and transitions to net cooling as the effects of CO2 reductions become dominant, resulting in climate mitigation only in the long term. Thus, the possibilities for shifting shipping to the Arctic confront policymakers with the question of how to weigh a century-scale warming with large uncertainties versus a long-term climate benefit from CO2 reductions.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2016

Jury is still out on the radiative forcing by black carbon

Olivier Boucher; Yves Balkanski; Øivind Hodnebrog; Cathrine Lund Myhre; Gunnar Myhre; Johannes Quaas; Bjørn H. Samset; N. A. J. Schutgens; P. Stier; Rong Wang

Peng et al. (1) conclude that a fast increase in the mass absorption cross-section (MAC) of black carbon (BC) in urban environments leads to significantly increased estimates of the BC radiative forcing (RF). Their chamber measurements are highly valuable and complement observations performed in ambient conditions, but their “enhancement factor” relative to an unspecified baseline may not be directly comparable to values used or simulated in global aerosol models. MAC, a key parameter in our understanding of the net BC climate impact, is indeed a more relevant quantity to examine. A fast MAC enhancement in polluted environments as the BC gets coated with organic and inorganic species is consistent with recent findings (2, 3). Global models used in AeroCom [table S1 in Peng et al. (1), ref. 4] have an average MAC of ∼8 m2 … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: olivier.boucher{at}lmd.jussieu.fr. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017

Rapid Adjustments Cause Weak Surface Temperature Response to Increased Black Carbon Concentrations

Camilla Weum Stjern; Bjørn H. Samset; Gunnar Myhre; Piers M. Forster; Øivind Hodnebrog; Timothy Andrews; Olivier Boucher; G. Faluvegi; Trond Iversen; M. Kasoar; Viatcheslav V. Kharin; A. Kirkevåg; Jean-Francois Lamarque; D. Olivié; Thomas Richardson; Dilshad Shawki; Drew T. Shindell; Christopher J. Smith; Toshihiko Takemura; Apostolos Voulgarakis

We investigate the climate response to increased concentrations of black carbon (BC), as part of the Precipitation Driver Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP). A tenfold increase in BC is simulated by 9 global coupled-climate models, producing a model-median effective radiative forcing (ERF) of 0.82 (ranging from 0.41 to 2.91) Wm-2, and a warming of 0.67 (0.16 to 1.66) K globally and 1.24 (0.26 to 4.31) K in the Arctic. A strong positive instantaneous radiative forcing (median of 2.10 Wm-2 based on five of the models) is countered by negative rapid adjustments (-0.64 Wm-2 for the same five models), which dampen the total surface temperature signal. Unlike other drivers of climate change, the response of temperature and cloud profiles to the BC forcing is dominated by rapid adjustments. Low-level cloud amounts increase for all models, while higher-level clouds are diminished. The rapid temperature response is particularly strong above 400 hPa, where increased atmospheric stabilization and reduced cloud cover contrast the response pattern of the other drivers. In conclusion, we find that this substantial increase in BC concentrations does have considerable impacts on important aspects of the climate system. However, some of these effects tend to offset one another, leaving a relatively small global warming of 0.47 K per Wm-2 - about 20 % lower than the response to a doubling of CO2. Translating the tenfold increase in BC to the present-day impact of anthropogenic BC (given the emissions used in this work) would leave a warming of merely 0.07 K.


Nature Geoscience | 2018

Discrepancy between simulated and observed ethane and propane levels explained by underestimated fossil emissions

Stig B. Dalsøren; Gunnar Myhre; Øivind Hodnebrog; Cathrine Lund Myhre; Andreas Stohl; I. Pisso; Stefan Schwietzke; Lena Höglund-Isaksson; Detlev Helmig; Stefan Reimann; Stéphane Sauvage; Norbert Schmidbauer; K. A. Read; Lucy J. Carpenter; Alastair C. Lewis; S. Punjabi; Markus Wallasch

Ethane and propane are the most abundant non-methane hydrocarbons in the atmosphere. However, their emissions, atmospheric distribution, and trends in their atmospheric concentrations are insufficiently understood. Atmospheric model simulations using standard community emission inventories do not reproduce available measurements in the Northern Hemisphere. Here, we show that observations of pre-industrial and present-day ethane and propane can be reproduced in simulations with a detailed atmospheric chemistry transport model, provided that natural geologic emissions are taken into account and anthropogenic fossil fuel emissions are assumed to be two to three times higher than is indicated in current inventories. Accounting for these enhanced ethane and propane emissions results in simulated surface ozone concentrations that are 5–13% higher than previously assumed in some polluted regions in Asia. The improved correspondence with observed ethane and propane in model simulations with greater emissions suggests that the level of fossil (geologic + fossil fuel) methane emissions in current inventories may need re-evaluation.Observations of ethane and propane distributions in the atmosphere are reproduced in simulations with an atmospheric chemistry transport model, if fossil emissions are a factor of two to three higher than previously assumed.


Journal of Climate | 2018

A PDRMIP multimodel study on the impacts of regional aerosol forcings on global and regional precipitation

L. Liu; Dilshad Shawki; Apostolos Voulgarakis; M. Kasoar; Bjørn H. Samset; Gunnar Myhre; Piers M. Forster; Øivind Hodnebrog; Jana Sillmann; Siv G. Aalbergsjø; Olivier Boucher; G. Faluvegi; Trond Iversen; A. Kirkevåg; Jean-Francois Lamarque; D. Olivié; Thomas Richardson; Drew T. Shindell; Toshihiko Takemura

Atmospheric aerosols such as sulfate and black carbon (BC) generate inhomogeneous radiative forcing and can affect precipitation in distinct ways compared to greenhouse gases (GHGs). Their regional effects on the atmospheric energy budget and circulation can be important for understanding and predicting global and regional precipitation changes, which act on top of the background GHG-induced hydrological changes. Under the framework of the Precipitation Driver Response Model Inter-comparison Project (PDRMIP), multiple models were used for the first time to simulate the influence of regional (Asian and European) sulfate and BC forcing on global and regional precipitation. The results show that, as in the case of global aerosol forcing, the global fast precipitation response to regional aerosol forcing scales with global atmospheric absorption, and the slow precipitation response scales with global surface temperature response. Asian sulphate aerosols appear to be a stronger driver of global temperature and precipitation change compared to European aerosols, but when the responses are normalised by unit radiative forcing or by aerosol burden change, the picture reverses, with European aerosols being more efficient in driving global change. The global apparent hydrological sensitivities of these regional forcing experiments are again consistent with those for corresponding global aerosol forcings found in the literature. However, the regional responses and regional apparent hydrological sensitivities do not align with the corresponding global values. Through a holistic approach involving analysis of the energy budget combined with exploring changes in atmospheric dynamics, we provide a framework for explaining the global and regional precipitation responses to regional aerosol forcing.


npj Climate and Atmospheric Science | 2018

Weak hydrological sensitivity to temperature change over land, independent of climate forcing

Bjørn H. Samset; Gunnar Myhre; Piers M. Forster; Øivind Hodnebrog; Timothy Andrews; Olivier Boucher; G. Faluvegi; D. Fläschner; M. Kasoar; Viatcheslav V. Kharin; A. Kirkevåg; Jean-Francois Lamarque; D. Olivié; Thomas Richardson; Drew T. Shindell; Toshihiko Takemura; Apostolos Voulgarakis

We present the global and regional hydrological sensitivity (HS) to surface temperature changes, for perturbations to CO2, CH4, sulfate and black carbon concentrations, and solar irradiance. Based on results from ten climate models, we show how modeled global mean precipitation increases by 2–3% per kelvin of global mean surface warming, independent of driver, when the effects of rapid adjustments are removed. Previously reported differences in response between drivers are therefore mainly ascribable to rapid atmospheric adjustment processes. All models show a sharp contrast in behavior over land and over ocean, with a strong surface temperature-driven (slow) ocean HS of 3–5%/K, while the slow land HS is only 0–2%/K. Separating the response into convective and large-scale cloud processes, we find larger inter-model differences, in particular over land regions. Large-scale precipitation changes are most relevant at high latitudes, while the equatorial HS is dominated by convective precipitation changes. Black carbon stands out as the driver with the largest inter-model slow HS variability, and also the strongest contrast between a weak land and strong sea response. We identify a particular need for model investigations and observational constraints on convective precipitation in the Arctic, and large-scale precipitation around the Equator.Climate change: Global warming increases rainfall most over oceansGlobal warming leads to more rain – but little of the change occurs over land. An international team of researchers, led by Bjørn H. Samset at the Norwegian CICERO Center for Climate Research, used ten global climate models to study how precipitation changes when just one factor in the climate system was allowed to change at a time. While models tend to give very different predictions of future rainfall for realistic scenarios, changes due solely to greenhouse gases, aerosols, or the amount of incoming sunlight, give clearer results. Overall, the amount of rain over oceans increases by 4% per degree Celsius, no matter what caused the surface warming. Over land, the increase is only 1–2%. This difference helps explain why observed rainfall changes over land have so far been modest.


Nature Communications | 2018

Sensible heat has significantly affected the global hydrological cycle over the historical period

Gunnar Myhre; Bjørn H. Samset; Øivind Hodnebrog; Timothy Andrews; Olivier Boucher; G. Faluvegi; D. Fläschner; Piers M. Forster; M. Kasoar; Viatcheslav V. Kharin; A. Kirkevåg; Jean-Francois Lamarque; D. Olivié; Thomas Richardson; Dilshad Shawki; Drew T. Shindell; Keith P. Shine; Camilla Weum Stjern; Toshihiko Takemura; Apostolos Voulgarakis

Globally, latent heating associated with a change in precipitation is balanced by changes to atmospheric radiative cooling and sensible heat fluxes. Both components can be altered by climate forcing mechanisms and through climate feedbacks, but the impacts of climate forcing and feedbacks on sensible heat fluxes have received much less attention. Here we show, using a range of climate modelling results, that changes in sensible heat are the dominant contributor to the present global-mean precipitation change since preindustrial time, because the radiative impact of forcings and feedbacks approximately compensate. The model results show a dissimilar influence on sensible heat and precipitation from various drivers of climate change. Due to its strong atmospheric absorption, black carbon is found to influence the sensible heat very differently compared to other aerosols and greenhouse gases. Our results indicate that this is likely caused by differences in the impact on the lower tropospheric stability.Precipitation changes are strongly linked to the Earth’s energy budget. Here the authors show that changes in sensible heat are the dominant contributor to the present global-mean precipitation change since pre-industrial time.

Collaboration


Dive into the Øivind Hodnebrog's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Olivié

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frode Stordal

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Kirkevåg

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Gauss

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Kasoar

Imperial College London

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge