Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peggy J. Farnham is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peggy J. Farnham.


Cell | 2007

Functional Demarcation of Active and Silent Chromatin Domains in Human HOX Loci by Noncoding RNAs

John L. Rinn; Michael Kertesz; Jordon K. Wang; Sharon L. Squazzo; Xiao Ling Xu; Samantha A. Brugmann; L. Henry Goodnough; Jill A. Helms; Peggy J. Farnham; Eran Segal; Howard Y. Chang

Noncoding RNAs (ncRNA) participate in epigenetic regulation but are poorly understood. Here we characterize the transcriptional landscape of the four human HOX loci at five base pair resolution in 11 anatomic sites and identify 231 HOX ncRNAs that extend known transcribed regions by more than 30 kilobases. HOX ncRNAs are spatially expressed along developmental axes and possess unique sequence motifs, and their expression demarcates broad chromosomal domains of differential histone methylation and RNA polymerase accessibility. We identified a 2.2 kilobase ncRNA residing in the HOXC locus, termed HOTAIR, which represses transcription in trans across 40 kilobases of the HOXD locus. HOTAIR interacts with Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) and is required for PRC2 occupancy and histone H3 lysine-27 trimethylation of HOXD locus. Thus, transcription of ncRNA may demarcate chromosomal domains of gene silencing at a distance; these results have broad implications for gene regulation in development and disease states.


Nature Biotechnology | 2010

The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium

Bradley E. Bernstein; John A. Stamatoyannopoulos; Joseph F. Costello; Bing Ren; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Alexander Meissner; Manolis Kellis; Marco A. Marra; Arthur L. Beaudet; Joseph R. Ecker; Peggy J. Farnham; Martin Hirst; Eric S. Lander; Tarjei S. Mikkelsen; James A. Thomson

The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium aims to produce a public resource of epigenomic maps for stem cells and primary ex vivo tissues selected to represent the normal counterparts of tissues and organ systems frequently involved in human disease.


Nature | 2012

Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data

Mark Gerstein; Anshul Kundaje; Manoj Hariharan; Stephen G. Landt; Koon Kiu Yan; Chao Cheng; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Ekta Khurana; Joel Rozowsky; Roger P. Alexander; Renqiang Min; Pedro Alves; Alexej Abyzov; Nick Addleman; Nitin Bhardwaj; Alan P. Boyle; Philip Cayting; Alexandra Charos; David Chen; Yong Cheng; Declan Clarke; Catharine L. Eastman; Ghia Euskirchen; Seth Frietze; Yao Fu; Jason Gertz; Fabian Grubert; Arif Harmanci; Preti Jain; Maya Kasowski

Transcription factors bind in a combinatorial fashion to specify the on-and-off states of genes; the ensemble of these binding events forms a regulatory network, constituting the wiring diagram for a cell. To examine the principles of the human transcriptional regulatory network, we determined the genomic binding information of 119 transcription-related factors in over 450 distinct experiments. We found the combinatorial, co-association of transcription factors to be highly context specific: distinct combinations of factors bind at specific genomic locations. In particular, there are significant differences in the binding proximal and distal to genes. We organized all the transcription factor binding into a hierarchy and integrated it with other genomic information (for example, microRNA regulation), forming a dense meta-network. Factors at different levels have different properties; for instance, top-level transcription factors more strongly influence expression and middle-level ones co-regulate targets to mitigate information-flow bottlenecks. Moreover, these co-regulations give rise to many enriched network motifs (for example, noise-buffering feed-forward loops). Finally, more connected network components are under stronger selection and exhibit a greater degree of allele-specific activity (that is, differential binding to the two parental alleles). The regulatory information obtained in this study will be crucial for interpreting personal genome sequences and understanding basic principles of human biology and disease.


Genome Research | 2012

ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia

Stephen G. Landt; Georgi K. Marinov; Anshul Kundaje; Pouya Kheradpour; Florencia Pauli; Serafim Batzoglou; Bradley E. Bernstein; Peter J. Bickel; James B. Brown; Philip Cayting; Yiwen Chen; Gilberto DeSalvo; Charles B. Epstein; Katherine I. Fisher-Aylor; Ghia Euskirchen; Mark Gerstein; Jason Gertz; Alexander J. Hartemink; Michael M. Hoffman; Vishwanath R. Iyer; Youngsook L. Jung; Subhradip Karmakar; Manolis Kellis; Peter V. Kharchenko; Qunhua Li; Tao Liu; X. Shirley Liu; Lijia Ma; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Richard M. Myers

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) followed by high-throughput DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) has become a valuable and widely used approach for mapping the genomic location of transcription-factor binding and histone modifications in living cells. Despite its widespread use, there are considerable differences in how these experiments are conducted, how the results are scored and evaluated for quality, and how the data and metadata are archived for public use. These practices affect the quality and utility of any global ChIP experiment. Through our experience in performing ChIP-seq experiments, the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia have developed a set of working standards and guidelines for ChIP experiments that are updated routinely. The current guidelines address antibody validation, experimental replication, sequencing depth, data and metadata reporting, and data quality assessment. We discuss how ChIP quality, assessed in these ways, affects different uses of ChIP-seq data. All data sets used in the analysis have been deposited for public viewing and downloading at the ENCODE (http://encodeproject.org/ENCODE/) and modENCODE (http://www.modencode.org/) portals.


Immunity | 2004

T-bet Regulates the Terminal Maturation and Homeostasis of NK and Vα14i NKT Cells

Michael J. Townsend; Amy S. Weinmann; Jennifer L. Matsuda; Rachelle Salomon; Peggy J. Farnham; Christine A. Biron; Laurent Gapin; Laurie H. Glimcher

Natural killer (NK) and CD1d-restricted Valpha14i natural killer T (NKT) cells play a critical early role in host defense. Here we show that mice with a targeted deletion of T-bet, a T-box transcription factor required for Th1 cell differentiation, have a profound, stem cell-intrinsic defect in their ability to generate mature NK and Valpha14i NKT cells. Both cell types fail to complete normal terminal maturation and are present in decreased numbers in peripheral lymphoid organs of T-bet(-/-) mice. T-bet expression is regulated during NK cell differentiation by NK-activating receptors and cytokines known to control NK development and effector function. Our results identify T-bet as a key factor in the terminal maturation and peripheral homeostasis of NK and Valpha14i NKT cells.


Nature Biotechnology | 2010

Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications

R. Alan Harris; Ting Wang; Cristian Coarfa; Raman P. Nagarajan; Chibo Hong; Sara L. Downey; Brett E. Johnson; Shaun D. Fouse; Allen Delaney; Yongjun Zhao; Adam B. Olshen; Tracy Ballinger; Xin Zhou; Kevin J. Forsberg; Junchen Gu; Lorigail Echipare; Henriette O'Geen; Ryan Lister; Mattia Pelizzola; Yuanxin Xi; Charles B. Epstein; Bradley E. Bernstein; R. David Hawkins; Bing Ren; Wen-Yu Chung; Hongcang Gu; Christoph Bock; Andreas Gnirke; Michael Q. Zhang; David Haussler

Analysis of DNA methylation patterns relies increasingly on sequencing-based profiling methods. The four most frequently used sequencing-based technologies are the bisulfite-based methods MethylC-seq and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS), and the enrichment-based techniques methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeDIP-seq) and methylated DNA binding domain sequencing (MBD-seq). We applied all four methods to biological replicates of human embryonic stem cells to assess their genome-wide CpG coverage, resolution, cost, concordance and the influence of CpG density and genomic context. The methylation levels assessed by the two bisulfite methods were concordant (their difference did not exceed a given threshold) for 82% for CpGs and 99% of the non-CpG cytosines. Using binary methylation calls, the two enrichment methods were 99% concordant and regions assessed by all four methods were 97% concordant. We combined MeDIP-seq with methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme (MRE-seq) sequencing for comprehensive methylome coverage at lower cost. This, along with RNA-seq and ChIP-seq of the ES cells enabled us to detect regions with allele-specific epigenetic states, identifying most known imprinted regions and new loci with monoallelic epigenetic marks and monoallelic expression.


Nature Reviews Genetics | 2009

Insights from genomic profiling of transcription factors

Peggy J. Farnham

A crucial question in the field of gene regulation is whether the location at which a transcription factor binds influences its effectiveness or the mechanism by which it regulates transcription. Comprehensive transcription factor binding maps are needed to address these issues, and genome-wide mapping is now possible thanks to the technological advances of ChIP–chip and ChIP–seq. This Review discusses how recent genomic profiling of transcription factors gives insight into how binding specificity is achieved and what features of chromatin influence the ability of transcription factors to interact with the genome. It also suggests future experiments that may further our understanding of the causes and consequences of transcription factor–genome interactions.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2001

Use of Chromatin Immunoprecipitation To Clone Novel E2F Target Promoters

Amy S. Weinmann; Stephanie M. Bartley; Theresa Zhang; Michael Q. Zhang; Peggy J. Farnham

ABSTRACT We have taken a new approach to the identification of E2F-regulated promoters. After modification of a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we cloned nine chromatin fragments which represent both strong and weak in vivo E2F binding sites. Further characterization of three of the cloned fragments revealed that they are bound in vivo not only by E2Fs but also by members of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein family and by RNA polymerase II, suggesting that these fragments represent promoters regulated by E2F transcription complexes. In fact, database analysis indicates that all three fragments correspond to genomic DNA located just upstream of start sites for previously identified mRNAs. One clone, ChET 4, corresponds to the promoter region for beclin 1, a candidate tumor suppressor protein. We demonstrate that another of the clones, ChET 8, is strongly bound by E2F family members in vivo but does not contain a consensus E2F binding site. However, this fragment functions as a promoter whose activity can be repressed by E2F1. Finally, we demonstrate that the ChET 9 promoter contains a consensus E2F binding site, can be activated by E2F1, and drives expression of an mRNA that is upregulated in colon and liver tumors. Interestingly, the characterized ChET promoters do not display regulation patterns typical of known E2F target genes in a U937 cell differentiation system. In summary, we have provided evidence that chromatin immunoprecipitation can be used to identify E2F-regulated promoters which contain both consensus and nonconsensus binding sites and have shown that not all E2F-regulated promoters show identical expression profiles.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Defining functional DNA elements in the human genome

Manolis Kellis; Barbara J. Wold; Michael Snyder; Bradley E. Bernstein; Anshul Kundaje; Georgi K. Marinov; Lucas D. Ward; Ewan Birney; Gregory E. Crawford; Job Dekker; Ian Dunham; Laura Elnitski; Peggy J. Farnham; Elise A. Feingold; Mark Gerstein; Morgan C. Giddings; David M. Gilbert; Thomas R. Gingeras; Eric D. Green; Roderic Guigó; Tim Hubbard; Jim Kent; Jason D. Lieb; Richard M. Myers; Michael J. Pazin; Bing Ren; John A. Stamatoyannopoulos; Zhiping Weng; Kevin P. White; Ross C. Hardison

With the completion of the human genome sequence, attention turned to identifying and annotating its functional DNA elements. As a complement to genetic and comparative genomics approaches, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Project was launched to contribute maps of RNA transcripts, transcriptional regulator binding sites, and chromatin states in many cell types. The resulting genome-wide data reveal sites of biochemical activity with high positional resolution and cell type specificity that facilitate studies of gene regulation and interpretation of noncoding variants associated with human disease. However, the biochemically active regions cover a much larger fraction of the genome than do evolutionarily conserved regions, raising the question of whether nonconserved but biochemically active regions are truly functional. Here, we review the strengths and limitations of biochemical, evolutionary, and genetic approaches for defining functional DNA segments, potential sources for the observed differences in estimated genomic coverage, and the biological implications of these discrepancies. We also analyze the relationship between signal intensity, genomic coverage, and evolutionary conservation. Our results reinforce the principle that each approach provides complementary information and that we need to use combinations of all three to elucidate genome function in human biology and disease.


Methods | 2002

Identification of unknown target genes of human transcription factors using chromatin immunoprecipitation

Amy S. Weinmann; Peggy J. Farnham

The standard chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay is used to examine the specific association of transcription factors with DNA in the context of living cells. Here we review two modifications to this protocol which are designed to identify novel target genes of transcription factors in mammalian cells. The main advantage to both of these approaches is that only DNA sequences directly bound by a factor within the context of a living cell will be identified. Therefore, artifacts associated with overexpression and/or alterations in signaling pathways are avoided. The first modification we describe, a ChIP cloning strategy, can be used to isolate any genomic fragment specifically associated with a particular factor. It requires no special equipment or reagents other than a high-affinity antibody to be used for immunoprecipitation of the factor of interest. However, it is most useful for the isolation of a small number of genomic targets. In contrast, the second modification, which combines ChIP with specialized CpG microarrays, is ideal for a more global analysis of target genes. Advantages, common problems, and detailed protocols for these two ChIP techniques are discussed.

Collaboration


Dive into the Peggy J. Farnham's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Victor X. Jin

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Seth Frietze

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephanie M. Bartley

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sushma Iyengar

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jill E. Slansky

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lijing Yao

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xiaoqin Xu

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Hirst

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge