Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Shawn E. Seader is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Shawn E. Seader.


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2013

Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler III: Analysis of the First 16 Months of Data

Natalie M. Batalha; Jason F. Rowe; Stephen T. Bryson; Christopher J. Burke; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jessie L. Christiansen; Fergal Mullally; Susan E. Thompson; Timothy M. Brown; Andrea K. Dupree; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Ronald L. Gilliland; Howard Isaacson; David W. Latham; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Samuel N. Quinn; Darin Ragozzine; Avi Shporer; William J. Borucki; David R. Ciardi; Thomas N. Gautier; Michael R. Haas; Jon M. Jenkins; David G. Koch; Jack J. Lissauer; William Rapin; Gibor Basri; Alan P. Boss

New transiting planet candidates are identified in 16 months (2009 May-2010 September) of data from the Kepler spacecraft. Nearly 5000 periodic transit-like signals are vetted against astrophysical and instrumental false positives yielding 1108 viable new planet candidates, bringing the total count up to over 2300. Improved vetting metrics are employed, contributing to higher catalog reliability. Most notable is the noise-weighted robust averaging of multi-quarter photo-center offsets derived from difference image analysis that identifies likely background eclipsing binaries. Twenty-two months of photometry are used for the purpose of characterizing each of the candidates. Ephemerides (transit epoch, T_0, and orbital period, P) are tabulated as well as the products of light curve modeling: reduced radius (R_P/R_★), reduced semimajor axis (d/R_★), and impact parameter (b). The largest fractional increases are seen for the smallest planet candidates (201% for candidates smaller than 2 R_⊕ compared to 53% for candidates larger than 2 R_⊕) and those at longer orbital periods (124% for candidates outside of 50 day orbits versus 86% for candidates inside of 50 day orbits). The gains are larger than expected from increasing the observing window from 13 months (Quarters 1-5) to 16 months (Quarters 1-6) even in regions of parameter space where one would have expected the previous catalogs to be complete. Analyses of planet frequencies based on previous catalogs will be affected by such incompleteness. The fraction of all planet candidate host stars with multiple candidates has grown from 17% to 20%, and the paucity of short-period giant planets in multiple systems is still evident. The progression toward smaller planets at longer orbital periods with each new catalog release suggests that Earth-size planets in the habitable zone are forthcoming if, indeed, such planets are abundant.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2012

Almost All of Kepler's Multiple-planet Candidates Are Planets

Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jason F. Rowe; Stephen T. Bryson; Elisabeth R. Adams; Lars A. Buchhave; David R. Ciardi; William D. Cochran; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Francois Fressin; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Matthew J. Holman; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; Karen Kinemuchi; David G. Koch; Robert C. Morehead; Darin Ragozzine; Shawn E. Seader; Peter G. Tanenbaum; Guillermo Torres; Joseph D. Twicken

We present a statistical analysis that demonstrates that the overwhelming majority of Kepler candidate multiple transiting systems (multis) indeed represent true, physically associated transiting planets. Binary stars provide the primary source of false positives among Kepler planet candidates, implying that false positives should be nearly randomly distributed among Kepler targets. In contrast, true transiting planets would appear clustered around a smaller number of Kepler targets if detectable planets tend to come in systems and/or if the orbital planes of planets encircling the same star are correlated. There are more than one hundred times as many Kepler planet candidates in multi-candidate systems as would be predicted from a random distribution of candidates, implying that the vast majority are true planets. Most of these multis are multiple-planet systems orbiting the Kepler target star, but there are likely cases where (1) the planetary system orbits a fainter star, and the planets are thus significantly larger than has been estimated, or (2) the planets orbit different stars within a binary/multiple star system. We use the low overall false-positive rate among Kepler multis, together with analysis of Kepler spacecraft and ground-based data, to validate the closely packed Kepler-33 planetary system, which orbits a star that has evolved somewhat off of the main sequence. Kepler-33 hosts five transiting planets, with periods ranging from 5.67 to 41 days.


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2014

PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER IV: PLANET SAMPLE FROM Q1-Q8 (22 MONTHS)

Christopher J. Burke; Stephen T. Bryson; Fergal Mullally; Jason F. Rowe; Jessie L. Christiansen; Susan E. Thompson; Jeffrey L. Coughlin; Michael R. Haas; Natalie M. Batalha; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jon M. Jenkins; Martin Still; William J. Borucki; W. J. Chaplin; David R. Ciardi; Bruce D. Clarke; William D. Cochran; Brice-Olivier Demory; Gilbert A. Esquerdo; Thomas N. Gautier; Ronald L. Gilliland; Forrest R. Girouard; Mathieu Havel; Christopher E. Henze; Steve B. Howell; Daniel Huber; David W. Latham; Jie Li; Robert C. Morehead; Timothy D. Morton

We provide updates to the Kepler planet candidate sample based upon nearly two years of highprecision photometry (i.e., Q1-Q8). From an initial list of nearly 13,400 Threshold Crossing Events (TCEs), 480 new host stars are identified from their flux time series as consistent with hosting transiting planets. Potential transit signals are subjected to further analysis using the pixel-level data, which allows background eclipsing binaries to be identified through small image position shifts during transit. We also re-evaluate Kepler Objects of Interest (KOI) 1-1609, which were identified early in the mission, using substantially more data to test for background false positives and to find additional multiple systems. Combining the new and previous KOI samples, we provide updated parameters for 2,738 Kepler planet candidates distributed across 2,017 host stars. From the combined Kepler planet candidates, 472 are new from the Q1-Q8 data examined in this study. The new Kepler planet candidates represent ∼40% of the sample with RP∼1R⊕ and represent ∼40% of the low equilibrium temperature (Teq<300 K) sample. We review the known biases in the current sample of Kepler planet candidates relevant to evaluating planet population statistics with the current Kepler planet candidate sample. Subject headings: catalogs – eclipses – planetary systems – space vehicles


Science | 2013

Kepler-62: A Five-Planet System with Planets of 1.4 and 1.6 Earth Radii in the Habitable Zone

William J. Borucki; Eric Agol; Francois Fressin; Lisa Kaltenegger; Jason F. Rowe; Howard Isaacson; Debra A. Fischer; Natalie M. Batalha; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Daniel C. Fabrycky; J.-M. Desert; Stephen T. Bryson; Fabienne A. Bastien; Alan P. Boss; Erik Brugamyer; Lars A. Buchhave; Christopher J. Burke; Douglas A. Caldwell; Josh Carter; David Charbonneau; Justin R. Crepp; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Jessie L. Christiansen; David R. Ciardi; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Laurance R. Doyle; Andrea K. Dupree; Michael Endl

Two Small Habitable Planets NASAs Kepler space telescope was launched in 2009 with the goal of detecting planets the size of Earth in the habitable zone of Sun-like stars and determining the frequency of these planets. Using data from Kepler, Borucki et al. (p. 587, published online 18 April) report the detection of a five-planet system where all the planets are smaller than twice the size of Earth and where the two outermost planets orbit in the habitable zone of their star, defined as the region where a rocky planet can host liquid water on its solid surface. The star, Kepler-62, is smaller and cooler than the Sun. The Kepler mission detected a five-planet system with two small planets in the habitable zone of a star lighter than the Sun. We present the detection of five planets—Kepler-62b, c, d, e, and f—of size 1.31, 0.54, 1.95, 1.61 and 1.41 Earth radii (R⊕), orbiting a K2V star at periods of 5.7, 12.4, 18.2, 122.4, and 267.3 days, respectively. The outermost planets, Kepler-62e and -62f, are super–Earth-size (1.25 R⊕ < planet radius ≤ 2.0 R⊕) planets in the habitable zone of their host star, respectively receiving 1.2 ± 0.2 times and 0.41 ± 0.05 times the solar flux at Earth’s orbit. Theoretical models of Kepler-62e and -62f for a stellar age of ~7 billion years suggest that both planets could be solid, either with a rocky composition or composed of mostly solid water in their bulk.


Nature | 2012

Two Earth-sized planets orbiting Kepler-20

Francois Fressin; Guillermo Torres; Jason F. Rowe; David Charbonneau; Leslie A. Rogers; Sarah Ballard; Natalie M. Batalha; William J. Borucki; Stephen T. Bryson; Lars A. Buchhave; David R. Ciardi; J.-M. Desert; Courtney D. Dressing; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Thomas N. Gautier; Christopher E. Henze; Matthew J. Holman; Andrew W. Howard; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; David G. Koch; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Samuel N. Quinn; Darin Ragozzine; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Sara Seager; Fergal Mullally

Since the discovery of the first extrasolar giant planets around Sun-like stars, evolving observational capabilities have brought us closer to the detection of true Earth analogues. The size of an exoplanet can be determined when it periodically passes in front of (transits) its parent star, causing a decrease in starlight proportional to its radius. The smallest exoplanet hitherto discovered has a radius 1.42 times that of the Earth’s radius (R⊕), and hence has 2.9 times its volume. Here we report the discovery of two planets, one Earth-sized (1.03R⊕) and the other smaller than the Earth (0.87R⊕), orbiting the star Kepler-20, which is already known to host three other, larger, transiting planets. The gravitational pull of the new planets on the parent star is too small to measure with current instrumentation. We apply a statistical method to show that the likelihood of the planetary interpretation of the transit signals is more than three orders of magnitude larger than that of the alternative hypothesis that the signals result from an eclipsing binary star. Theoretical considerations imply that these planets are rocky, with a composition of iron and silicate. The outer planet could have developed a thick water vapour atmosphere.


Nature | 2012

Alignment of the stellar spin with the orbits of a three-planet system

Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Joshua N. Winn; Bruce D. Clarke; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; John C. Geary; Matthew J. Holman; Andrew W. Howard; Jon M. Jenkins; David G. Koch; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Fergal Mullally; Darin Ragozzine; Shawn E. Seader; Martin Still; Susan E. Thompson

The Sun’s equator and the planets’ orbital planes are nearly aligned, which is presumably a consequence of their formation from a single spinning gaseous disk. For exoplanetary systems this well-aligned configuration is not guaranteed: dynamical interactions may tilt planetary orbits, or stars may be misaligned with the protoplanetary disk through chaotic accretion , magnetic interactions or torques from neighbouring stars. Indeed, isolated ‘hot Jupiters’ are often misaligned and even orbiting retrograde. Here we report an analysis of transits of planets over starspots on the Sun-like star Kepler-30 (ref. 8), and show that the orbits of its three planets are aligned with the stellar equator. Furthermore, the orbits are aligned with one another to within a few degrees. This configuration is similar to that of our Solar System, and contrasts with the isolated hot Jupiters. The orderly alignment seen in the Kepler-30 system suggests that high obliquities are confined to systems that experienced disruptive dynamical interactions. Should this be corroborated by observations of other coplanar multi-planet systems, then star–disk misalignments would be ruled out as the explanation for the high obliquities of hot Jupiters, and dynamical interactions would be implicated as the origin of hot Jupiters.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2015

Terrestrial Planet Occurrence Rates for the Kepler GK Dwarf Sample

Christopher J. Burke; Jessie L. Christiansen; Fergal Mullally; Shawn E. Seader; Daniel Huber; Jason F. Rowe; Jeffrey L. Coughlin; Susan E. Thompson; Joseph Catanzarite; Bruce D. Clarke; Timothy D. Morton; Douglas A. Caldwell; Stephen T. Bryson; Michael R. Haas; Natalie M. Batalha; Jon M. Jenkins; Peter Tenenbaum; Joseph D. Twicken; Jie Li; Elisa V. Quintana; Christopher E. Henze; William J. Borucki; Steve B. Howell; Martin Still

We measure planet occurrence rates using the planet candidates discovered by the Q1-Q16 Kepler pipeline search. This study examines planet occurrence rates for the Kepler GK dwarf target sample for planet radii, 0.75<Rp<2.5 Rearth, and orbital periods, 50<Porb<300 days, with an emphasis on a thorough exploration and identification of the most important sources of systematic uncertainties. Integrating over this parameter space, we measure an occurrence rate of F=0.77 planets per star, with an allowed range of 0.3<F<1.9. The allowed range takes into account both statistical and systematic uncertainties, and values of F beyond the allowed range are significantly in disagreement with our analysis. We generally find higher planet occurrence rates and a steeper increase in planet occurrence rates towards small planets than previous studies of the Kepler GK dwarf sample. Through extrapolation, we find that the one year orbital period terrestrial planet occurrence rate, zeta_1=0.1, with an allowed range of 0.01<zeta_1<2, where zeta_1 is defined as the number of planets per star within 20% of the Rp and Porb of Earth. For G dwarf hosts, the zeta_1 parameter space is a subset of the larger eta_earth parameter space, thus zeta_1 places a lower limit on eta_earth for G dwarf hosts. From our analysis, we identify the leading sources of systematics impacting Kepler occurrence rate determinations as: reliability of the planet candidate sample, planet radii, pipeline completeness, and stellar parameters.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2013

Transit timing observations from Kepler – VII. Confirmation of 27 planets in 13 multiplanet systems via transit timing variations and orbital stability

Jason H. Steffen; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric Agol; Eric B. Ford; Robert C. Morehead; William D. Cochran; Jack J. Lissauer; Elisabeth R. Adams; William J. Borucki; Steve Bryson; Douglas A. Caldwell; Andrea K. Dupree; Jon M. Jenkins; Paul Robertson; Jason F. Rowe; Shawn E. Seader; Susan E. Thompson; Joseph D. Twicken

We conrm 27 planets in 13 planetary systems by showing the existence of statistically signicant


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2015

PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BYKEPLER. VI. PLANET SAMPLE FROM Q1–Q16 (47 MONTHS)

Fergal Mullally; Jeffrey L. Coughlin; Susan E. Thompson; Jason F. Rowe; Christopher J. Burke; David W. Latham; Natalie M. Batalha; Stephen T. Bryson; Jessie L. Christiansen; Christopher E. Henze; A. Ofir; Billy Quarles; Avi Shporer; Vincent Van Eylen; Christa Van Laerhoven; Yash Shah; Angie Wolfgang; W. J. Chaplin; Ji-Wei Xie; R. L. Akeson; Vic S. Argabright; Eric Bachtell; William J. Borucki; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jennifer R. Campbell; Joseph H. Catanzarite; William D. Cochran; Riley M. Duren; Scott W. Fleming; Dorothy Ann Fraquelli

We provide updates to the Kepler planet candidate sample based upon nearly two years of high-precision photometry (i.e., Q1-Q8). From an initial list of nearly 13,400 threshold crossing events, 480 new host stars are identified from their flux time series as consistent with hosting transiting planets. Potential transit signals are subjected to further analysis using the pixel-level data, which allows background eclipsing binaries to be identified through small image position shifts during transit. We also re-evaluate Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) 1-1609, which were identified early in the mission, using substantially more data to test for background false positives and to find additional multiple systems. Combining the new and previous KOI samples, we provide updated parameters for 2738 Kepler planet candidates distributed across 2017 host stars. From the combined Kepler planet candidates, 472 are new from the Q1-Q8 data examined in this study. The new Kepler planet candidates represent ~40% of the sample with R P ~ 1 R ? and represent ~40% of the low equilibrium temperature (T eq < 300?K) sample. We review the known biases in the current sample of Kepler planet candidates relevant to evaluating planet population statistics with the current Kepler planet candidate sample.


Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific | 2012

The Derivation, Properties, and Value of Kepler’s Combined Differential Photometric Precision

Jessie L. Christiansen; Jon M. Jenkins; Douglas A. Caldwell; Christopher J. Burke; P. Tenenbaum; Shawn E. Seader; Susan E. Thompson; Bruce D. Clarke; Jie Li; Jeffrey C. Smith; Martin C. Stumpe; Joseph D. Twicken; Jeffrey Edward van Cleve

ABSTRACT.The Kepler Mission is searching for Earth-size planets orbiting solar-like stars by simultaneously observing >160,000>160,000 stars to detect sequences of transit events in the photometric light curves. The Combined Differential Photometric Precision (CDPP) is the metric that defines the ease with which these weak terrestrial transit signatures can be detected. An understanding of CDPP is invaluable for evaluating the completeness of the Kepler survey and inferring the underlying planet population. This paper describes how the Kepler CDPP is calculated, and introduces tables of rms CDPP on a per-target basis for 3-, 6-, and 12-hr transit durations, which are now available for all Kepler observations. Quarter 3 is the first typical set of observations at the nominal length and completeness for a quarter, from 2009 September 18 to 2009 December 16, and we examine the properties of the rms CDPP distribution for this data set. Finally, we describe how to employ CDPP to calculate target completeness, ...

Collaboration


Dive into the Shawn E. Seader's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jon M. Jenkins

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jessie L. Christiansen

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William J. Borucki

Rochester Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jason F. Rowe

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge