Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Victor S. Nirmalanandhan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Victor S. Nirmalanandhan.


Journal of Biomolecular Screening | 2009

Stem cells in drug discovery, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine: emerging opportunities and challenges.

Victor S. Nirmalanandhan; G. Sitta Sittampalam

Stem cells, irrespective of their origin, have emerged as valuable reagents or tools in human health in the past 2 decades. Initially, a research tool to study fundamental aspects of developmental biology is now the central focus of generating transgenic animals, drug discovery, and regenerative medicine to address degenerative diseases of multiple organ systems. This is because stem cells are pluripotent or multipotent cells that can recapitulate developmental paths to repair damaged tissues. However, it is becoming clear that stem cell therapy alone may not be adequate to reverse tissue and organ damage in degenerative diseases. Existing small-molecule drugs and biologicals may be needed as “molecular adjuvants” or enhancers of stem cells administered in therapy or adult stem cells in the diseased tissues. Hence, a combination of stem cell-based, high-throughput screening and 3D tissue engineering approaches is necessary to advance the next wave of tools in preclinical drug discovery. In this review, the authors have attempted to provide a basic account of various stem cells types, as well as their biology and signaling, in the context of research in regenerative medicine. An attempt is made to link stem cells as reagents, pharmacology, and tissue engineering as converging fields of research for the next decade. (Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2009:755-768)


Assay and Drug Development Technologies | 2010

Activity of Anticancer Agents in a Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Model

Victor S. Nirmalanandhan; Alicia Duren; Peter Hendricks; George Vielhauer; Gurusingham Sitta Sittampalam

Cell-monolayer-based assays for chemotherapeutic drug discovery have proven to be highly artificial compared with physiological systems. The objective of this study was to culture cancer cells in a simple 3-dimensional (3D) collagen gel model to study the antiproliferative activity of known lung cancer drugs. The validity of our 3D model was tested by measuring the activity of 10 lung cancer drugs (Paclitaxel, Alimta, Zactima, Doxorubicin, Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, 17AAg, Cisplatin, and 2 experimental drugs from the University of Kansas [KU174 and KU363]) in 2 lung cancer cell lines (A549 and H358) and comparing the activity in a traditional 2-dimensional (2D) in vitro cellular assay. Both potency and efficacy of these drugs were calculated to evaluate the activity of the drugs. Our results demonstrate that the activity of these drugs showed significant differences when tested in 3D cultures, which varied with individual drugs and the cell line used for testing. For example, the cytotoxicity of Paclitaxel, KU174, Alimta, Zacitma, Doxorubicin, Vinorelbine, KU363, and 17AAg was significantly changed when tested in the 3D model, whereas the potency of Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in H358 cell line remained unaffected. A similar pattern, with some differences, was observed in A549 cells and is discussed in detail in this article. The observed differences in potency and efficacy of the cancer drugs in 3D models suggest that the biological implications of screening configurations should be taken into account to select superior cancer drug candidates in preclinical studies.


Journal of Biomechanics | 2008

Effect of scaffold material, construct length and mechanical stimulation on the in vitro stiffness of the engineered tendon construct

Victor S. Nirmalanandhan; Marepalli B. Rao; Jason T. Shearn; Natalia Juncosa-Melvin; Cindi Gooch; David L. Butler

Introducing mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-seeded collagen constructs into load-protected wound sites in the rabbit patellar and Achilles tendons significantly improves their repair outcome compared to natural healing of the unfilled defect. However, these constructs would not be acceptable alternatives for repairing complete tendon ruptures because they lack the initial stiffness at the time of surgery to resist the expected peak in vivo forces thereafter. Since the stiffness of these constructs has also been shown to positively correlate with the stiffness of the subsequent repairs, improving initial stiffness by appropriate selection of in vitro culture conditions would seem crucial. In this study we examined the individual and combined effects of collagen scaffold type, construct length, and mechanical stimulation on in vitro implant stiffness. Two levels each of scaffold material (collagen gel vs. collagen sponge), construct length (short vs. long), and mechanical stimulation (stimulated vs. non-stimulated) were examined. Our results indicate that all three treatment factors influenced construct linear stiffness. Increasing the length of the construct had the greatest effect on the stiffness compared to introducing mechanical stimulation or changing the scaffold material. A significant interaction was also found between length and stimulation. Of the eight groups studied, longer, stimulated, cell-sponge constructs showed the highest in vitro linear stiffness. We now plan in vivo studies to determine if higher stiffness constructs generate higher stiffness repairs 12 weeks after surgery and if in vitro construct stiffness continues to correlate with in vivo repair parameters like linear stiffness.


Tissue Engineering Part A | 2009

Combined Effects of Scaffold Stiffening and Mechanical Preconditioning Cycles on Construct Biomechanics, Gene Expression, and Tendon Repair Biomechanics

Victor S. Nirmalanandhan; Natalia Juncosa-Melvin; Jason T. Shearn; Gregory P. Boivin; Marc T. Galloway; Cynthia Gooch; Gino Bradica; David L. Butler

Our group has previously reported that in vitro mechanical stimulation of tissue-engineered tendon constructs significantly increases both construct stiffness and the biomechanical properties of the repair tissue after surgery. When optimized using response surface methodology, our results indicate that a mechanical stimulus with three components (2.4% strain, 3000 cycles/day, and one cycle repetition) produced the highest in vitro linear stiffness. Such positive correlations between construct and repair stiffness after surgery suggest that enhancing structural stiffness before surgery could not only accelerate repair stiffness but also prevent premature failures in culture due to poor mechanical integrity. In this study, we examined the combined effects of scaffold crosslinking and subsequent mechanical stimulation on construct mechanics and biology. Autologous tissue-engineered constructs were created by seeding mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from 15 New Zealand white rabbits on type I collagen sponges that had undergone additional dehydrothermal crosslinking (termed ADHT in this manuscript). Both constructs from each rabbit were mechanically stimulated for 8h/day for 12 consecutive days with half receiving 100 cycles/day and the other half receiving 3000 cycles/day. These paired MSC-collagen autologous constructs were then implanted in bilateral full-thickness, full-length defects in the central third of rabbit patellar tendons. Increasing the number of in vitro cycles/day delivered to the ADHT constructs in culture produced no differences in stiffness or gene expression and no changes in biomechanical properties or histology 12 weeks after surgery. Compared to MSC-based repairs from a previous study that received no additional treatment in culture, ADHT crosslinking of the scaffolds actually lowered the 12-week repair stiffness. Thus, while ADHT crosslinking may initially stiffen a construct in culture, this specific treatment also appears to mask any benefits of stimulation among repairs postsurgery. Our findings emphasize the importance of properly preconditioning a scaffold to better control/modulate MSC differentiation in vitro and to further enhance repair outcome in vivo.


Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-transactions of The Asme | 2007

Mechanical Stimulation of Tissue Engineered Tendon Constructs: Effect of Scaffold Materials

Victor S. Nirmalanandhan; Matthew R. Dressler; Jason T. Shearn; Natalia Juncosa-Melvin; Marepalli B. Rao; Cynthia Gooch; Gino Bradica; David L. Butler

Our group has shown that numerous factors can influence how tissue engineered tendon constructs respond to in vitro mechanical stimulation. Although one study showed that stimulating mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-collagen sponge constructs significantly increased construct linear stiffness and repair biomechanics, a second study showed no such effect when a collagen gel replaced the sponge. While these results suggest that scaffold material impacts the response of MSCs to mechanical stimulation, a well-designed intra-animal study was needed to directly compare the effects of type-I collagen gel versus type-I collagen sponge in regulating MSC response to a mechanical stimulus. Eight constructs from each cell line (n=8 cell lines) were created in specially designed silicone dishes. Four constructs were created by seeding MSCs on a type-I bovine collagen sponge, and the other four were formed by seeding MSCs in a purified bovine collagen gel. In each dish, two cell-sponge and two cell-gel constructs from each line were then mechanically stimulated once every 5 min to a peak strain of 2.4%, for 8 h/day for 2 weeks. The other dish remained in an incubator without stimulation for 2 weeks. After 14 days, all constructs were failed to determine mechanical properties. Mechanical stimulation significantly improved the linear stiffness (0.048+/-0.009 versus 0.015+/-0.004; mean+/-SEM (standard error of the mean ) N/mm) and linear modulus (0.016+/-0.004 versus 0.005+/-0.001; mean+/-SEM MPa) of cell-sponge constructs. However, the same stimulus produced no such improvement in cell-gel construct properties. These results confirm that collagen sponge rather than collagen gel facilitates how cells respond to a mechanical stimulus and may be the scaffold of choice in mechanical stimulation studies to produce functional tissue engineered structures.


Journal of Orthopaedic Research | 2010

Chondroitin-6-Sulfate Incorporation and Mechanical Stimulation Increase MSC-Collagen Sponge Construct Stiffness

Kirsten R. C. Kinneberg; Victor S. Nirmalanandhan; Natalia Juncosa-Melvin; Heather M. Powell; Steven T. Boyce; Jason T. Shearn; David L. Butler

Using functional tissue engineering principles, our laboratory has produced tendon repair tissue which matches the normal patellar tendon force‐displacement curve up to 32% of failure. This repair tissue will need to withstand more strenuous activities, which can reach or even exceed 40% of failure force. To improve the linear stiffness of our tissue engineered constructs (TECs) and tissue engineered repairs, our lab is incorporating the glycosaminoglycan chondroitin‐6‐sulfate (C6S) into a type I collagen scaffold. In this study, we examined the effect of C6S incorporation and mechanical stimulation cycle number on linear stiffness and mRNA expression (collagen types I and III, decorin and fibronectin) for mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)‐collagen sponge TECs. The TECs were fabricated by inoculating MSCs at a density of 0.14 × 106 cells/construct onto pre‐cut scaffolds. Primarily type I collagen scaffold materials, with or without C6S, were cultured using mechanical stimulation with three different cycle numbers (0, 100, or 3,000 cycles/day). After 2 weeks in culture, TECs were evaluated for linear stiffness and mRNA expression. C6S incorporation and cycle number each played an important role in gene expression, but only the interaction of C6S incorporation and cycle number produced a benefit for TEC linear stiffness.


Tissue Engineering Part A | 2008

Improving linear stiffness of the cell-seeded collagen sponge constructs by varying the components of the mechanical stimulus.

Victor S. Nirmalanandhan; Jason T. Shearn; Natalia Juncosa-Melvin; Marepalli B. Rao; Cynthia Gooch; Abhishek Jain; Gino Bradica; David L. Butler

In vitro mechanical stimulation has been reported to induce cell alignment and increase cellular proliferation and collagen synthesis. Our group has previously reported that in vitro mechanical stimulation of tissue-engineered tendon constructs significantly increases construct stiffness and repair biomechanics after surgery. However, these studies used a single mechanical stimulation profile, the latter composed of multiple components whose individual and combined effects on construct properties remain unknown. Thus, the purpose of this study was to understand the relative importance of a subset of these components on construct stiffness. To try to optimize the resulting mechanical stimulus, we used an iterative process to vary peak strain, cycle number, and cycle repetition while controlling cycle frequency (1 Hz), rise and fall times (25% and 17% of the period, respectively), hours of stimulation/day (8 h/day), and total time of stimulation (12 days). Two levels of peak strain (1.2 % and 2.4%), cycle number (100 and 3000 cycles/day), and cycle repetition (1 and 20) were first examined. Higher levels of peak strain and cycle number were then examined to optimize the stimulus using response surface methodology. Our results indicate that constructs stimulated with 2.4% strain, 3000 cycles/day, and one cycle repetition produced the stiffest constructs. Given the significant positive correlations we have previously found between construct stiffness and repair biomechanics at 12 weeks post-surgery, these in vitro enhancements offer the prospect of further improving repair biomechanics.


Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology | 2012

Effects of respiratory mechanical forces on the pharmacological response of lung cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents

Peter Hendricks; Francisco J. Diaz; Sarah Schmitt; G. Sitta Sittampalam; Victor S. Nirmalanandhan

In vitro screening of chemotherapeutic agents is routinely carried out in static monolayer cell cultures. However, drugs administered to patients act in the presence of various microenvironments in vivo. For example, in lung tumors, mechanical forces are constantly present and do affect the physiological response of the lung tissue to a variety of therapeutic agents. We hypothesized that mechanical forces may affect the response of lung tumors to chemotherapeutic agents and studied the effects under simulated conditions. First, we examined the effects of simulated forces that approximate normal respiration on the proliferation and morphology of NCI‐H358 and A549 cell lines. Then, we studied the effects of the simulated forces on the ability of Paclitaxel, Doxorubicin, Cisplatin, Zactima and an experimental drug to induce cytotoxicity in both cell lines. Cells were treated with the drugs in the presence or absence of simulated forces (20% maximum strain and 15 cycles/minute) that approximate human lung expansion and contraction. Cell proliferation and the effectiveness of the drugs were assessed. Using a standard exponential cell growth model, it was determined that mechanical forces significantly reduced the proliferation of both cell lines. Interestingly, forces also significantly lowered the effectiveness of all drugs except Zactima in A549 cells, while in NCI‐H358 cells, Zactima was the only drug that demonstrated an increase in effectiveness owing to applied forces. Our results demonstrate that mechanical forces have significant impact on cell survival and chemotherapeutic efficacy and may be of significance in engineering improved screening assays for antitumor drug discovery.


Assay and Drug Development Technologies | 2012

Stretching mechanotransduction from the lung to the lab: approaches and physiological relevance in drug discovery.

Sarah Schmitt; Peter Hendricks; Josh Weir; Raj T. Somasundaram; G. Sitta Sittampalam; Victor S. Nirmalanandhan

Recent years have shown a great deal of interest and research into the understanding of the biological and physiological roles of mechanical forces on cellular behavior. Despite these reports, in vitro screening of new molecular entities for lung ailments is still performed in static cell culture models. Failure to incorporate the effects of mechanical forces during early stages of screening could significantly reduce the success rate of drug candidates in the highly expensive clinical phases of the drug discovery pipeline. The objective of this review is to expand our current understanding of lung mechanotransduction and extend its applicability to cellular physiology and new drug screening paradigms. This review covers early in vivo studies and the importance of mechanical forces in normal lung development, use of different types of bioreactors that simulate in vivo movements in a controlled in vitro cell culture environment, and recent research using dynamic cell culture models. The cells in lungs are subjected to constant stretching (mechanical forces) in regular cycles due to involuntary expansion and contraction during respiration. The effects of stretch on normal and abnormal (disease) lung cells under pathological conditions are discussed. The potential benefits of extending dynamic cell culture models (screening in the presence of forces) and the associated challenges are also discussed in this review. Based on this review, the authors advocate the development of dynamic high throughput screening models that could facilitate the rapid translation of in vitro biology to animal models and clinical efficacy. These concepts are translatable to cardiovascular, digestive, and musculoskeletal tissues and in vitro cell systems employed routinely in drug-screening applications.


ASME 2007 Summer Bioengineering Conference | 2007

Mechanical Stimulation Increases Collagen Type I and Collagen Type III Gene Expression of Stem Cell: Collagen Sponge Constructs for Patellar Tendon Repair

Natalia Juncosa-Melvin; Karl S. Matlin; Robert W. Holdcraft; Victor S. Nirmalanandhan; David L. Butler

Tendons (rotator cuff, Achilles and patellar tendons) are among the most commonly injured soft tissues [1]. Many repairs/reconstructions have been attempted using sutures, resorbable biomaterials, autografts, and allografts, but with varying success. A tissue engineered repair using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is attractive [2–4] but often lacks initial stiffness and strength [5].Copyright

Collaboration


Dive into the Victor S. Nirmalanandhan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David L. Butler

Applied Science Private University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jason T. Shearn

Applied Science Private University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cynthia Gooch

University of Cincinnati

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge