Zhengxin Zhu
Goddard Space Flight Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Zhengxin Zhu.
Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2006
D. F. Baker; R. M. Law; Kevin Robert Gurney; P. J. Rayner; Philippe Peylin; A. S. Denning; P. Bousquet; Lori Bruhwiler; Yu-Han Chen; P. Ciais; Inez Y. Fung; Martin Heimann; Jasmin G. John; Takashi Maki; Shamil Maksyutov; Kenneth A. Masarie; Michael J. Prather; Bernard Pak; Shoichi Taguchi; Zhengxin Zhu
Monthly CO2 fluxes are estimated across 1988–2003 for 22 emission regions using data from 78 CO2 measurement sites. The same inversion (method, priors, data) is performed with 13 different atmospheric transport models, and the spread in the results is taken as a measure of transport model error. Interannual variability (IAV) in the winds is not modeled, so any IAV in the measurements is attributed to IAV in the fluxes. When both this transport error and the random estimation errors are considered, the flux IAV obtained is statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05 when the fluxes are grouped into land and ocean components for three broad latitude bands, but is much less so when grouped into continents and basins. The transport errors have the largest impact in the extratropical northern latitudes. A third of the 22 emission regions have significant IAV, including the Tropical East Pacific (with physically plausible uptake/release across the 1997–2000 El Nino/La Nina) and Tropical Asia (with strong release in 1997/1998 coinciding with large-scale fires there). Most of the global IAV is attributed robustly to the tropical/southern land biosphere, including both the large release during the 1997/1998 El Nino and the post-Pinatubo uptake.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2003
Mark R. Schoeberl; Anne R. Douglass; Zhengxin Zhu; Steven Pawson
[1] We use kinematic and diabatic back trajectory calculations, driven by winds from a general circulation model (GCM) and two different data assimilation systems (DAS), to compute the age spectrum at three latitudes in the lower stratosphere. The age spectra are compared to chemical transport model (CTM) calculations, and the mean ages from all of these studies are compared to observations. The age spectra computed using the GCM winds show a reasonably isolated tropics, in good agreement with observations; however, the age spectra determined from the DAS differ from the GCM spectra. For the DAS diabatic trajectory calculations there is too much exchange between the tropics and midlatitudes. The age spectrum is thus too broad, and the tropical mean age is too old as a result of mixing older midlatitude air with tropical air. Likewise, the midlatitude mean age is too young because of the in-mixing of tropical air. The DAS kinematic trajectory calculations show excessive vertical dispersion of parcels in addition to excessive exchange between the tropics and midlatitudes. Because air is moved rapidly to the troposphere from the vertical dispersion, the age spectrum is shifted toward the young side. The excessive vertical and meridional dispersion compensate in the kinematic case, giving a reasonable tropical mean age. The CTM calculation of the age spectrum using the DAS winds shows the same vertical and meridional dispersive characteristics of the kinematic trajectory calculation. These results suggest that the current DAS products will not give realistic trace gas distributions for long integrations; they also help explain why the extratropical mean ages determined in a number of previous DAS-driven CTMs are too young compared with observations. Finally, we note that trajectory-generated age spectra show significant age anomalies correlated with the seasonal cycles. These anomalies can be linked to year-to-year variations in the tropical heating rate. The anomalies are suppressed in the CTM spectra, suggesting that the CTM transport scheme is too diffusive.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2005
Kevin Robert Gurney; Yu Han Chen; Takashi Maki; S. Randy Kawa; Arlyn Elizabeth Andrews; Zhengxin Zhu
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2004
S. R. Kawa; David J. Erickson; Steven Pawson; Zhengxin Zhu
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2013
Joseph A. Berry; Adam Wolf; J. Elliott Campbell; Ian T. Baker; Nicola J. Blake; D. R. Blake; A. Scott Denning; S. Randy Kawa; Stephen A. Montzka; Ulrike Seibt; Keren Stimler; Dan Yakir; Zhengxin Zhu
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2007
Steven Pawson; Ivanka Stajner; S. Randolph Kawa; Hiroo Hayashi; Wei-Wu Tan; J. Eric Nielsen; Zhengxin Zhu; Lang-Ping Chang; Nathaniel J. Livesey
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2008
D. J. Erickson; Richard Tran Mills; Jay S. Gregg; T J Blasing; Forrest M. Hoffman; Robert Joseph Andres; M. Devries; Zhengxin Zhu; S. R. Kawa
Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2006
D. F. Baker; R. M. Law; Kevin Robert Gurney; P. J. Rayner; Philippe Peylin; A. S. Denning; P. Bousquet; L. M. P. Bruhwiler; Yu-Han Chen; P. Ciais; Inez Y. Fung; Martin Heimann; Jasmin G. John; Takashi Maki; Shamil Maksyutov; Kenneth A. Masarie; Michael J. Prather; Bernard Pak; Shoichi Taguchi; Zhengxin Zhu
Archive | 2011
Steven Pawson; Lesley E. Ott; Zhengxin Zhu; Kevin West Bowman; Holger Brix; G. James Collatz; Stephanie Dutkiewicz; Joshua B. Fisher; Watson W. Gregg; Chris Hill; DImiris Menemenlis; Christopher S. Potter; M. R. Gunson; Kenneth W. Jucks
Archive | 2009
Steven Pawson; Zhengxin Zhu; Leslie Ott; Andrea Molod; Bryan N. Duncan; J. E. Nielsen