A. Bock
Max Planck Society
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A. Bock.
Physics of Plasmas | 2018
A. Bock; H. Doerk; R. Fischer; D. Rittich; J. Stober; A. Burckhart; E. Fable; B. Geiger; A. Mlynek; M. Reich; H. Zohm
The appropriate tailoring of the q-profile is the key to accessing Advanced Tokamak (AT) scenarios, which are of great benefit to future all-metal fusion power plants. Such scenarios depend on low collisionality ν* which permits efficient external current drive and high amounts of intrinsic bootstrap current. At constant pressure, lowering of the electron density ne leads to a strong decrease in the collisionality with increasing electron temperature ν*u2009 ∼ T e − 3. Simultaneously, the conditions for low ne also benefit impurity accumulation. This paper reports on how radiative collapses due to central W accumulation were overcome by improved understanding of the changes to recycling and pumping, substantially expanded ECRH capacities for both heating and current drive, and a new solid W divertor capable of withstanding the power loads at low ne. Furthermore, it reports on various improvements to the reliability of the q-profile reconstruction. A candidate steady state scenario for ITER/DEMO (q95u2009=u20095.3, βN...
Fusion Science and Technology | 2016
R. Fischer; A. Bock; M. Dunne; J. C. Fuchs; L. Giannone; K. Lackner; P. J. McCarthy; E. Poli; R. Preuss; Markus Rampp; M. Schubert; J. Stober; W. Suttrop; G. Tardini; M. Weiland
Abstract A tokamak equilibrium reconstruction can benefit much from internal measurements of the current distribution. If lacking robust internal measurements, the reconstruction will be ill posed in the plasma core, not allowing for a sensible estimation of the current distribution. Such deficiencies can be compensated for by modeling the current distribution evolution by employing the current diffusion equation between successive equilibria. A scheme for the coupling of the predictive current diffusion equation with the equilibrium reconstruction from an inverse Grad-Shafranov equilibrium solver minimizing a least-squares criterion on measured and modeled data is proposed. The scheme is intended for routine equilibrium analysis shortly after the discharge where all diagnostic data are available. Results from the implementation at ASDEX Upgrade are shown, applied to a reversed-shear plasma with counter-current electron cyclotron current drive and to the start-up phase of the plasma. Results are compared to TRANSP calculations.
Computer Physics Communications | 2018
E. Poli; A. Bock; M. Lochbrunner; O. Maj; M. Reich; A. Snicker; A. Stegmeir; F. Volpe; N. Bertelli; R. Bilato; G. D. Conway; D. Farina; F. Felici; L. Figini; R. Fischer; C. Galperti; T. Happel; Y.R. Lin-Liu; N. B. Marushchenko; U. Mszanowski; F.M. Poli; J. Stober; E. Westerhof; R. Zille; A. G. Peeters; G. Pereverzev
Abstract The paraxial WKB code TORBEAM (Poli, 2001) is widely used for the description of electron-cyclotron waves in fusion plasmas, retaining diffraction effects through the solution of a set of ordinary differential equations. With respect to its original form, the code has undergone significant transformations and extensions, in terms of both the physical model and the spectrum of applications. The code has been rewritten in Fortran 90 and transformed into a library, which can be called from within different (not necessarily Fortran-based) workflows. The models for both absorption and current drive have been extended, including e.g. fully-relativistic calculation of the absorption coefficient, momentum conservation in electron–electron collisions and the contribution of more than one harmonic to current drive. The code can be run also for reflectometry applications, with relativistic corrections for the electron mass. Formulas that provide the coupling between the reflected beam and the receiver have been developed. Accelerated versions of the code are available, with the reduced physics goal of inferring the location of maximum absorption (including or not the total driven current) for a given setting of the launcher mirrors. Optionally, plasma volumes within given flux surfaces and corresponding values of minimum and maximum magnetic field can be provided externally to speed up the calculation of full driven-current profiles. These can be employed in real-time control algorithms or for fast data analysis.
Review of Scientific Instruments | 2018
L. Giannone; R. Fischer; J. C. Fuchs; B. Geiger; M. Maraschek; D. Rittich; B. Sieglin; A. Bock; J. Hobirk; A. Kallenbach; V. Mertens; K. H. Schuhbeck; P. J. McCarthy
Internal diamagnetic flux measurements, with measurement loops and compensation magnetic probes inside the vacuum vessel, are now available on the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak. The measured diamagnetic flux is compared to that predicted by simulations and calculated from equilibrium reconstruction. The diamagnetic flux measured at 2 positions separated toroidally by 180° in the vacuum vessel is compared.
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2013
L. Giannone; M. Reich; M. Maraschek; E. Poli; C. Rapson; L. Barrera; R. M. McDermott; A. Mlynek; Q. Ruan; W. Treutterer; L. Wenzel; A. Bock; G. D. Conway; R. Fischer; J. C. Fuchs; K. Lackner; P. J. McCarthy; R. Preuss; Markus Rampp; K. H. Schuhbeck; J. Stober; H. Zohm
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2015
L. Giannone; R. Fischer; P. J. McCarthy; T. Odstrcil; I. Zammuto; A. Bock; G. D. Conway; J. C. Fuchs; A. Gude; V. Igochine; A. Kallenbach; K. Lackner; M. Maraschek; C. Rapson; Q. Ruan; K. H. Schuhbeck; W. Suttrop; L. Wenzel
Nuclear Fusion | 2018
H. Doerk; A. Bock; A. Di Siena; E. Fable; T. Görler; F. Jenko; J. Stober
Nuclear Fusion | 2017
A. Bock; E. Fable; R. Fischer; M. Reich; D. Rittich; J. Stober; M. Bernert; A. Burckhart; H. Doerk; M. Dunne; B. Geiger; L. Giannone; V. Igochine; A. Kappatou; R. M. McDermott; A. Mlynek; T. Odstrcil; G. Tardini; H. Zohm
European Fusion Programme Workshop 2016 (EFPW 2016) | 2016
H. Doerk; A. Bock; C. Challis; J. Citrin; A. Di Siena; E. Fable; J. Garcia; T. Goerler; F. Jenko; J. Stober; Jet Contributors
26th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference (FEC 2016) | 2016
C. Hopf; D. Rittich; B. Geiger; A. Bock; A. Burckhart; R. M. McDermott; A. Mlynek; C. Rapson; M. Reich; F. Ryter; M. Willensdorfer