Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Aaron O. Bailey is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Aaron O. Bailey.


Nature Cell Biology | 2006

The human CENP-A centromeric nucleosome-associated complex

Daniel R. Foltz; Lars E. T. Jansen; Ben E. Black; Aaron O. Bailey; John R. Yates; Don W. Cleveland

The basic element for chromosome inheritance, the centromere, is epigenetically determined in mammals. The prime candidate for specifying centromere identity is the array of nucleosomes assembled with CENP-A, the centromere-specific histone H3 variant. Here, we show that CENP-A nucleosomes directly recruit a proximal CENP-A nucleosome associated complex (NAC) comprised of three new human centromere proteins (CENP-M, CENP-N and CENP-T), along with CENP-U(50), CENP-C and CENP-H. Assembly of the CENP-A NAC at centromeres is dependent on CENP-M, CENP-N and CENP-T. Facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) and nucleophosmin-1 (previously implicated in transcriptional chromatin remodelling and as a multifunctional nuclear chaperone, respectively) are absent from histone H3-containing nucleosomes, but are stably recruited to CENP-A nucleosomes independent of CENP-A NAC. Seven new CENP-A-nucleosome distal (CAD) centromere components (CENP-K, CENP-L, CENP-O, CENP-P, CENP-Q, CENP-R and CENP-S) are identified as assembling on the CENP-A NAC. The CENP-A NAC is essential, as disruption of the complex causes errors of chromosome alignment and segregation that preclude cell survival despite continued centromere-derived mitotic checkpoint signalling.


Cell | 2006

Global Analysis of Protein Palmitoylation in Yeast

Amy F. Roth; Junmei Wan; Aaron O. Bailey; Beimeng Sun; Jason A. Kuchar; William N. Green; Brett S. Phinney; John R. Yates; Nicholas G. Davis

Protein palmitoylation is a reversible lipid modification that regulates membrane tethering for key proteins in cell signaling, cancer, neuronal transmission, and membrane trafficking. Palmitoylation has proven to be a difficult study: Specifying consensuses for predicting palmitoylation remain unavailable, and first-example palmitoylation enzymes--i.e., protein acyltransferases (PATs)--were identified only recently. Here, we use a new proteomic methodology that purifies and identifies palmitoylated proteins to characterize the palmitoyl proteome of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Thirty-five new palmitoyl proteins are identified, including many SNARE proteins and amino acid permeases as well as many other participants in cellular signaling and membrane trafficking. Analysis of mutant yeast strains defective for members of the DHHC protein family, a putative PAT family, allows a matching of substrate palmitoyl proteins to modifying PATs and reveals the DHHC family to be a family of diverse PAT specificities responsible for most of the palmitoylation within the cell.


Cell | 2009

Centromere-Specific Assembly of CENP-A Nucleosomes Is Mediated by HJURP

Daniel R. Foltz; Lars E. T. Jansen; Aaron O. Bailey; John R. Yates; Emily A. Bassett; Stacey Wood; Ben E. Black; Don W. Cleveland

The centromere is responsible for accurate chromosome segregation. Mammalian centromeres are specified epigenetically, with all active centromeres containing centromere-specific chromatin in which CENP-A replaces histone H3 within the nucleosome. The proteins responsible for assembly of human CENP-A into centromeric nucleosomes during the G1 phase of the cell cycle are shown here to be distinct from the chromatin assembly factors previously shown to load other histone H3 variants. Here we demonstrate that prenucleosomal CENP-A is complexed with histone H4, nucleophosmin 1, and HJURP. Recruitment of new CENP-A into nucleosomes at replicated centromeres is dependent on HJURP. Recognition by HJURP is mediated through the centromere targeting domain (CATD) of CENP-A, a region that we demonstrated previously to induce a unique conformational rigidity to both the subnucleosomal CENP-A heterotetramer and the corresponding assembled nucleosome. We propose HJURP to be a cell-cycle-regulated CENP-A-specific histone chaperone required for centromeric chromatin assembly.


Nature | 2008

Neural palmitoyl-proteomics reveals dynamic synaptic palmitoylation

Rujun Kang; Junmei Wan; Pamela Arstikaitis; Hideto Takahashi; Kun Huang; Aaron O. Bailey; James Thompson; Amy F. Roth; Renaldo C. Drisdel; Ryan Mastro; William N. Green; John R. Yates; Nicholas G. Davis; Alaa El-Husseini

Palmitoylation regulates diverse aspects of neuronal protein trafficking and function. Here a global characterization of rat neural palmitoyl-proteomes identifies most of the known neural palmitoyl proteins—68 in total, plus more than 200 new palmitoyl-protein candidates, with further testing confirming palmitoylation for 21 of these candidates. The new palmitoyl proteins include neurotransmitter receptors, transporters, adhesion molecules, scaffolding proteins, as well as SNAREs and other vesicular trafficking proteins. Of particular interest is the finding of palmitoylation for a brain-specific Cdc42 splice variant. The palmitoylated Cdc42 isoform (Cdc42-palm) differs from the canonical, prenylated form (Cdc42-prenyl), both with regard to localization and function: Cdc42-palm concentrates in dendritic spines and has a special role in inducing these post-synaptic structures. Furthermore, assessing palmitoylation dynamics in drug-induced activity models identifies rapidly induced changes for Cdc42 as well as for other synaptic palmitoyl proteins, suggesting that palmitoylation may participate broadly in the activity-driven changes that shape synapse morphology and function.


Nature Protocols | 2007

Palmitoylated proteins: purification and identification

Junmei Wan; Amy F. Roth; Aaron O. Bailey; Nicholas G. Davis

This proteomic protocol purifies and identifies palmitoylated proteins (i.e., S-acylated proteins) from complex protein extracts. The method relies on an acyl-biotinyl exchange chemistry in which biotin moieties are substituted for the thioester-linked protein acyl-modifications through a sequence of three in vitro chemical steps: (i) blockade of free thiols with N-ethylmaleimide; (ii) cleavage of the Cys-palmitoyl thioester linkages with hydroxylamine; and (iii) labeling of thiols, newly exposed by the hydroxylamine, with biotin–HPDP (Biotin-HPDP-N-[6-(Biotinamido)hexyl]-3′-(2′-pyridyldithio)propionamide. The biotinylated proteins are then affinity-purified using streptavidin–agarose and identified by multi-dimensional protein identification technology (MuDPIT), a high-throughput, tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS)–based proteomic technology. MuDPIT also affords a semi-quantitative analysis that may be used to assess the gross changes induced to the global palmitoylation profile by mutation or drugs. Typically, 2–3 weeks are required for this analysis.


Current Biology | 2005

Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1

Erin M. Green; Andrew J. Antczak; Aaron O. Bailey; Alexa A. Franco; Kevin J. Wu; John R. Yates; Paul D. Kaufman

The orderly deposition of histones onto DNA is mediated by conserved assembly complexes, including chromatin assembly factor-1 (CAF-1) and the Hir proteins . CAF-1 and the Hir proteins operate in distinct but functionally overlapping histone deposition pathways in vivo . The Hir proteins and CAF-1 share a common partner, the highly conserved histone H3/H4 binding protein Asf1, which binds the middle subunit of CAF-1 as well as to Hir proteins . Asf1 binds to newly synthesized histones H3/H4 , and this complex stimulates histone deposition by CAF-1 . In yeast, Asf1 is required for the contribution of the Hir proteins to gene silencing . Here, we demonstrate that Hir1, Hir2, Hir3, and Hpc2 comprise the HIR complex, which copurifies with the histone deposition protein Asf1. Together, the HIR complex and Asf1 deposit histones onto DNA in a replication-independent manner. Histone deposition by the HIR complex and Asf1 is impaired by a mutation in Asf1 that inhibits HIR binding. These data indicate that the HIR complex and Asf1 proteins function together as a conserved eukaryotic pathway for histone replacement throughout the cell cycle.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2010

ALS-linked mutant superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) alters mitochondrial protein composition and decreases protein import

Quan Li; Christine Vande Velde; Adrian Israelson; Jing Xie; Aaron O. Bailey; Meng-Qui Dong; Seung-Joo Chun; Tamal Roy; Leah Winer; John R. Yates; Roderick A. Capaldi; Don W. Cleveland; Timothy M. Miller

Mutations in superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) cause familial ALS. Mutant SOD1 preferentially associates with the cytoplasmic face of mitochondria from spinal cords of rats and mice expressing SOD1 mutations. Two-dimensional gels and multidimensional liquid chromatography, in combination with tandem mass spectrometry, revealed 33 proteins that were increased and 21 proteins that were decreased in SOD1G93A rat spinal cord mitochondria compared with SOD1WT spinal cord mitochondria. Analysis of this group of proteins revealed a higher-than-expected proportion involved in complex I and protein import pathways. Direct import assays revealed a 30% decrease in protein import only in spinal cord mitochondria, despite an increase in the mitochondrial import components TOM20, TOM22, and TOM40. Recombinant SOD1G93A or SOD1G85R, but not SOD1WT or a Parkinsons disease-causing, misfolded α-synucleinE46K mutant, decreased protein import by >50% in nontransgenic mitochondria from spinal cord, but not from liver. Thus, altered mitochondrial protein content accompanied by selective decreases in protein import into spinal cord mitochondria comprises part of the mitochondrial damage arising from mutant SOD1.


Cell Cycle | 2007

Large-Scale Identification of c-MYC-Associated Proteins Using a Combined TAP/MudPIT Approach

Heike B. Koch; Ru Zhang; Berlinda Verdoodt; Aaron O. Bailey; Chang-Dong Zhang; John R. Yates; Antje Menssen; Heiko Hermeking

The c‑MYC oncogene encodes a transcription factor, which is sufficient and necessary for the induction of cellular proliferation. However, the c‑MYC protein is a relatively weak transactivator suggesting that it may have other functions. To identify protein interactors which may reveal new functions or represent regulators of c‑MYC we systematically identified proteins associated with c‑MYC in vivo using a proteomic approach. We combined tandem affinity purification (TAP) with the mass spectral multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT). Thereby, 221 c‑MYC‑associated proteins were identified. Among them were 17 previously known c‑MYC‑interactors. Selected new c‑MYC‑associated proteins (DBC‑1, FBX29, KU70, MCM7, Mi2‑b/CHD4, RNA Pol II, RFC2, RFC3, SV40 Large T Antigen, TCP1a, U5‑116kD, ZNF281) were confirmed independently. For association with MCM7, SV40 Large T Antigen and DBC‑1 the functionally important MYC‑box II region was required, whereas FBX29 and Mi2‑b interacted via MYC‑box II and the BR‑HLH‑LZ motif. In addition, regulators of c‑MYC activity were identified: ectopic expression of FBX29, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, decreased c‑MYC protein levels and inhibited c‑MYC transactivation, whereas knock‑down of FBX29 elevated the concentration of c‑MYC. Furthermore, sucrose gradient analysis demonstrated that c‑MYC is present in numerous complexes with varying size and composition, which may accommodate the large number of new c‑MYC‑associated proteins identified here and mediate the diverse functions of c‑MYC. Our results suggest that c‑MYC, besides acting as a mitogenic transcription factor, regulates cellular proliferation by direct association with protein complexes involved in multiple synthetic processes required for cell division, as for example DNA‑replication/repair and RNA‑processing. Furthermore, this first comprehensive description of the c‑MYC‑associated sub‑proteome will facilitate further studies aimed to elucidate the biology of c‑MYC.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2007

Pph3–Psy2 is a phosphatase complex required for Rad53 dephosphorylation and replication fork restart during recovery from DNA damage

Bryan M. O'Neill; Shawn J. Szyjka; Ewa T. Lis; Aaron O. Bailey; John R. Yates; Oscar M. Aparicio; Floyd E. Romesberg

Activation of the checkpoint kinase Rad53 is a critical response to DNA damage that results in stabilization of stalled replication forks, inhibition of late-origin initiation, up-regulation of dNTP levels, and delayed entry to mitosis. Activation of Rad53 is well understood and involves phosphorylation by the protein kinases Mec1 and Tel1 as well as in trans autophosphorylation by Rad53 itself. However, deactivation of Rad53, which must occur to allow the cell to recover from checkpoint arrest, is not well understood. Here, we present genetic and biochemical evidence that the type 2A-like protein phosphatase Pph3 forms a complex with Psy2 (Pph3–Psy2) that binds and dephosphorylates activated Rad53 during treatment with, and recovery from, methylmethane sulfonate-mediated DNA damage. In the absence of Pph3–Psy2, Rad53 dephosphorylation and the resumption of DNA synthesis are delayed during recovery from DNA damage. This delay in DNA synthesis reflects a failure to restart stalled replication forks, whereas, remarkably, genome replication is eventually completed by initiating late origins of replication despite the presence of hyperphosphorylated Rad53. These findings suggest that Rad53 regulates replication fork restart and initiation of late firing origins independently and that regulation of these processes is mediated by specific Rad53 phosphatases.


PLOS Biology | 2007

Global Analysis of Posttranslational Protein Arginylation

Catherine C. L. Wong; Tao Xu; Reena Rai; Aaron O. Bailey; John R. Yates; Yuri I. Wolf; Henry Zebroski; Anna Kashina

Posttranslational arginylation is critical for embryogenesis, cardiovascular development, and angiogenesis, but its molecular effects and the identity of proteins arginylated in vivo are largely unknown. Here we report a global analysis of this modification on the protein level and identification of 43 proteins arginylated in vivo on highly specific sites. Our data demonstrate that unlike previously believed, arginylation can occur on any N-terminally exposed residue likely defined by a structural recognition motif on the protein surface, and that it preferentially affects a number of physiological systems, including cytoskeleton and primary metabolic pathways. The results of our study suggest that protein arginylation is a general mechanism for regulation of protein structure and function and outline the potential role of protein arginylation in cell metabolism and embryonic development.

Collaboration


Dive into the Aaron O. Bailey's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John R. Yates

Scripps Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ben E. Black

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amy F. Roth

Wayne State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Junmei Wan

Wayne State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lars E. T. Jansen

Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge