Andre Poock
Advanced Micro Devices
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Andre Poock.
Optical Microlithography XVI | 2003
Rolf Seltmann; Rolf Stephan; Martin Mazur; Christopher A. Spence; Bruno La Fontaine; Dirk Stankowski; Andre Poock; Wolfram Grundke
The paramount importance of CD-control for logic speed is well recognized. Whereas across wafer-line-width-variation (AWLV) influences the width of the speed distribution, across chip line-width-variation (ACLV) is a dominating factor for device leakage. In our study we will discuss different ACLV-terms based on AMD’s 0.18 and 0.13μm processes. We will show how the variation of different scanner and reticle-parameters affects both random and systematic ACLV-components. We will show that the systematic part either can be dominated by global or layout-specific CD-signature, depending on the reticle manufacturing process, scanner condition and the circuit design. In particular we will discuss the impact of defocus, lens aberrations, illumination uniformity dose accuracy and flare. Eventually, we will show the response of critical performance parameters of state of the art μPs and we will judge different parameters with respect to their impact on μP-speed. Focus control and flare control are found to be the most critical tasks. We will discuss appropriate methods to ensure both focus and flare don’t affect device performance negatively.
Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVIII | 2004
Brian J. Grenon; Kaustuve Bhattacharyya; William Waters Volk; Khoi A. Phan; Andre Poock
DUV lithography induced sub-pellicle particle formation continues to be a significant problem in semiconductor fabs. We have previously reported on the identification of various defects detected on reticles after extended use. This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of various molecular contaminants found on the backside surface of a reticle used in high-volume production. Previously all or most of the photo-induced contaminants were detected under the pellicle. This particular contamination is a white “haze” detected by pre-exposure inspection using KLA-Tencor TeraStar STARlight with Un-patterned Reticle Surface Analysis, (URSA). Chemical analysis was done using Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (ToF-SIMS) and Raman spectroscopy.
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering | 2008
Andre Poock; Sarah N. McGowan; Francois Weisbuch; Guido Schnasse; Rajesh Ghaskadvi
The identification of OPC induced litho hotspots within the product design is essential and a must to make sure that a new OPC model is working correctly and does no harm to the design and future product. Several techniques and methods for OPC verification and identification of hotspots are known and long adopted within the field. An optical rule check done by the simulation software after OPC is one way of identifying hotspots within the design of the whole chip. This is typically done by using a DRC-type width or space check on simulation contours (nominal exposure contour or process window contours). However, the pass/fail nature of this check at a single CD value requires good calibration of the simulation model to avoid false positives and ease of disposition at tapeout. Another method is the process window qualification method which uses the defect inspection of a focus exposure matrix wafer for OPC hotspot identification. However, this can not be done prior to ordering a mask. Based on a 45nm line space layer OPC qualification, we will demonstrate how optical rule check and process window qualification is performed, what the individual results will be, and how they can be used for OPC quality evaluation. The general goal of this work is to show the capabilities of optical rule check and process window qualification, compare both methods, and detect limitations.
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering | 2006
Stephanie Maelzer; Andre Poock; Bryan Reese; Kaustuve Bhattacharyya; Farzin Mirzaagha; Stephen Cox; Michael Lang
High resolution mask inspection in advanced wafer fabs is a necessity. Initial and progressive mask defect problem still remains an industry wide mask reliability issue. Defect incidences and its criticality vary significantly among the type of masks, technology node and layer, fab environment and mask usage. A usage and layer based qualification strategy for masks in production need to be adopted in wafer fabs. With the help of a high-resolution direct reticle inspection, early detection of critical and also non-critical defects at high capture rates is possible. A high-resolution inspection that is capable of providing necessary sensitivity to critical emerging defects (near edge) is very important in advanced nodes. At the same time, a way to disposition (make a go / no-go decision) on these defective masks is also very important. As the impact of these defects will depend on not only their size, but also on their transmission and MEEF, various defect types and characteristics have to be considered. In this technical report the adoption of such a high-resolution mask inspection system in wafer fab production is presented and discussed. Data on this work will include inspection results from advanced masks, layer and product based inspection pixel assignment, defect disposition and overall wafer fab strategies in day-to-day production towards mask inspection.
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering | 2009
Rolf Seltmann; Gert Burbach; Anne Parge; Jens Busch; Tino Hertzsch; Andre Poock; Francois Weisbuch; Andre Holfeld
Within our paper we are going to discuss the variation within the patterning process in the context of the overall electrical parameter variation in an advanced logic Fab. The evaluation is based on both the variation of ring oscillators that are distributed across the chip as well as on local variation of matched transistor pairs. Starting with a view back to the 130nm technology, we will show how things and requirements changed over time. In particular we focus on the gate layer where we do a detailed ACLV-comparison from the 130nm technology node down to todays 45nm node. Within the patterning variation we keep special attention on the mask performance. Within that section, we do a detailed wafer-mask correlation analysis. Additionally to the low-MEEF gate layer we show the importance of the mask CD-performance for a typical high MEEF-layer. Finally, we discuss the mask contribution to the overall overlay error for the most critical contact to gate overlay. In all of the cases, we will show that the mask performance is not the limiter within todays most advanced technology, as long as we get access to a world class mask shop.
23rd Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology | 2003
Brian J. Grenon; Kaustuve Bhattacharyya; William Waters Volk; Andre Poock
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering | 2006
Andre Poock; Stephanie Maelzer; Chris A. Spence; Cyrus E. Tabery; Michael Lang; Guido Schnasse; Milko Peikert; Kaustuve Bhattacharyya
Archive | 2010
Andre Poock; Rene Wirtz
Archive | 2009
Andre Poock; Jan Hoentschel
Archive | 2008
Jan Hoentschel; Andre Poock