Julien Masliah-Planchon

IL28B polymorphism is associated with treatment response in patients with genotype 4 chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND & AIMS Polymorphisms in the region of the interleukin (IL)28B gene have been associated with pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin treatment response mainly in genotype 1 HCV infections. However, there are few data on HCV genotype 4 (HCV-4) infection. We evaluated, in a unique well-characterized cohort of HCV-4 patients, the association of IL28B polymorphism with response to treatment or liver disease severity. METHODS This study included 164 HCV-4 patients from different ethnic groups (Egyptian, European, and Sub-Saharan African). Among these patients, 82 were studied for response and 160 for disease severity. Free DNA extracted from all the 164 patients serum samples was analyzed by direct sequencing of the SNP rs12979860 of IL28B. Genetic and bio-clinical features from patients having sustained virological response (43 SVR patients) and from those who did not respond to treatment or had a relapse after the end of the treatment (39 NR patients) were compared. IL28B polymorphism was compared between the 78 patients with mild fibrosis (Metavir score F0-F1) and the 82 with advanced fibrosis (F2-F4). RESULTS Our data showed a better treatment response rate of the C allele of the IL28B gene SNP rs12979860 (p=0.0008). The response rates were 81.8%, 46.5%, and 29.4% for genotype CC, CT, and TT, respectively. No significant relationship was found between rs12979860 and the severity of the disease. CONCLUSIONS The SNP rs12979860 is strongly associated with SVR in patients infected with HCV-4, but not with liver disease severity. Analysis of IL28B genotype might be used to guide treatment for these patients.

SPRED1 germline mutations caused a neurofibromatosis type 1 overlapping phenotype

Objective: Germline loss-of-function mutations in the SPRED1 gene have recently been identified in patients fulfilling the National Institutes of Health (NIH) diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) but with no NF1 (neurofibromin 1) mutation found, suggesting a neurofibromatosis type 1-like syndrome. Methods: 61 index cases with NF1 clinical diagnosis but no identifiable NF1 mutation were screened for SPRED1 mutation. Results: We describe one known SPRED1 mutation (c.190C>T leading to p.Arg64Stop) and four novel mutations (c.637C>T leading to p.Gln213Stop, c.2T>C leading to p.Met1Thr, c.46C>T leading to p.Arg16Stop, and c.1048_1060del leading to p.Gly350fs) in five French families. Their NF1-like phenotype was characterised by a high prevalence of café-au-lait spots, freckling, learning disability, and an absence of neurofibromas and Lisch nodules in agreement with the original description. However, we did not observe Noonan-like dysmorphy. It is noteworthy that one patient with the p.Arg16Stop mutation developed a monoblastic acute leukaemia. Conclusions: In our series, SPRED1 mutations occurred with a prevalence of 0.5% in NF1 patients and in 5% of NF1 patients displaying an NF1-like phenotype. SPRED1 mutated patients did not display any specific dermatologic features that were not present in NF1 patients, except for the absence of neurofibromas that seem to be a specific clinical feature of NF1. The exact phenotypic spectrum and the putative complications of this NF1 overlapping syndrome, in particular haematological malignancies, remain to be further characterised. NIH diagnostic criteria for NF1 must be revised in view of this newly characterised Legius syndrome in order to establish a specific genetic counselling.

Role of Noncoding RNA ANRIL in Genesis of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1

BACKGROUND Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a tumor predisposition syndrome with a worldwide birth incidence of one in 2500. Genetic factors unrelated to the NF1 locus are thought to influence the number of plexiform neurofibromas (PNFs) in patients with NF1, but no factors have been identified to date. METHODS We used high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization of tissue from 22 PNFs obtained from 18 NF1 patients to identify modifier genes involved in PNF development. We used a family-based association test for five previously identified cancer-susceptibility tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs1063192, rs2151280, rs2218220, rs10757257, and rs7023329) located in chromosomal region 9p21.3 in 1105 subjects (740 NF1 patients and 365 non-affected relatives) from 306 families. To confirm the functional role of rs2151280, we used real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to analyze the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), CDKN2B, alternate reading frame (ARF), and antisense noncoding RNA in the INK4 locus (ANRIL) in the peripheral blood of 124 NF1 patients. Relationships between CDKN2A, CDKN2B, ARF, and ANRIL expression and the rs2151280 genotype were tested by the Kruskal-Wallis test. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS In NF1-associated PNFs, 9p21.3 deletions (including the CDKN2A/B-ANRIL locus) were found as the only recurrent somatic alterations. Single-nucleotide polymorphism rs2151280 (located in ANRIL) was statistically significantly associated with the number of PNFs (P < .001) in NF1 patients. In addition, allele T of rs2151280 was statistically significantly associated with reduced ANRIL transcript levels (P < .001), suggesting that modulation of ANRIL expression mediates PNF susceptibility. CONCLUSION Identification of ANRIL as a modifier gene in NF1 may offer clues to the molecular pathogenesis of PNFs, particularly neurofibroma formation, and emphasizes the unanticipated role of large noncoding RNA in activation of critical regulators of tumor development.

Baraitser-Winter cerebrofrontofacial syndrome : Delineation of the spectrum in 42 cases

Baraitser–Winter, Fryns–Aftimos and cerebrofrontofacial syndrome types 1 and 3 have recently been associated with heterozygous gain-of-function mutations in one of the two ubiquitous cytoplasmic actin-encoding genes ACTB and ACTG1 that encode β- and γ-actins. We present detailed phenotypic descriptions and neuroimaging on 36 patients analyzed by our group and six cases from the literature with a molecularly proven actinopathy (9 ACTG1 and 33 ACTB). The major clinical anomalies are striking dysmorphic facial features with hypertelorism, broad nose with large tip and prominent root, congenital non-myopathic ptosis, ridged metopic suture and arched eyebrows. Iris or retinal coloboma is present in many cases, as is sensorineural deafness. Cleft lip and palate, hallux duplex, congenital heart defects and renal tract anomalies are seen in some cases. Microcephaly may develop with time. Nearly all patients with ACTG1 mutations, and around 60% of those with ACTB mutations have some degree of pachygyria with anteroposterior severity gradient, rarely lissencephaly or neuronal heterotopia. Reduction of shoulder girdle muscle bulk and progressive joint stiffness is common. Early muscular involvement, occasionally with congenital arthrogryposis, may be present. Progressive, severe dystonia was seen in one family. Intellectual disability and epilepsy are variable in severity and largely correlate with CNS anomalies. One patient developed acute lymphocytic leukemia, and another a cutaneous lymphoma, indicating that actinopathies may be cancer-predisposing disorders. Considering the multifaceted role of actins in cell physiology, we hypothesize that some clinical manifestations may be partially mutation specific. Baraitser–Winter cerebrofrontofacial syndrome is our suggested designation for this clinical entity.

Identification of genes potentially involved in the increased risk of malignancy in NF1-microdeleted patients.

Patients with NF1 microdeletion develop more neurofibromas at a younger age, and have an increased risk of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs). We postulated that the increased risk of malignancy could be due to inactivation, in addition to NF1, of a second tumor suppressor gene located in the typical 1.4-Mb microdeletion found in most of the microdeleted patients. We investigated the expression of NF1, the other 16 protein-coding genes and the 2 microRNAs located in the 1.4-Mb microdeletion by means of real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in a large series of human dermal and plexiform neurofibromas and MPNSTs. Five genes were significantly upregulated: OMG and SUZ12 in plexiform neurofibromas and ATAD5, EVI2A and C17 orf79 in MPNSTs. More interestingly, two genes were significantly downregulated (RNF135 and CENTA2) in tumor Schwann cells from MPNST biopsies and in MPNST cell lines. This study points to the involvement of several genes (particularly RNF135 and CENTA2) in the increased risk of malignancy observed in NF1-microdeleted patients.

Detection and Characterization of NF1 Microdeletions by Custom High Resolution Array CGH

In 5% to 10% of cases, neurofibromatosis type 1 is caused by microdeletions scattered across the entire NF1 gene and various neighboring genes. The phenotype appears to be more severe in patients with NF1 microdeletions than in patients with NF1 single point mutations. We have developed a new method for detecting and characterizing NF1 microdeletions based on a custom high-resolution oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization by using the custom 8x15K Agilent array format. The array comprised a total of 14,207 oligonucleotide probes spanning the whole of chromosome 17, including 12,314 probes spanning an approximately 8 Mb interval surrounding the NF1 locus. We validated this approach by testing NF1 microdeleted DNA samples previously characterized by means of microsatellites and real-time PCR methods. Our array comparative genomic hybridization provided enough information for subsequent long-range PCR and nucleotide sequencing of the microdeletion endpoints. Unlike previously described methods, our array comparative genomic hybridization was able to unambiguously differentiate between the three types of microdeletions (type I, type II, and atypical) and to characterize atypical microdeletions. Further comparative studies of patients with well-characterized genotypes and phenotypes and different microdeletions sizes and breakpoints will help determine whether haploinsufficiency of deleted genes and/or genes rearrangements influence clinical outcomes.

RAS-MAPK pathway epigenetic activation in cancer: miRNAs in action

The highly conserved RAS-mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway is involved in a wide range of cellular processes including differentiation, proliferation, and survival. Somatic mutations in genes encoding RAS-MAPK components frequently occur in many tumors, making the RAS-MAPK a critical pathway in human cancer. Since the pioneering study reporting that let-7 miRNA acted as tumor suppressor by repressing the RAS oncogene, growing evidence has suggested the importance of miRNAs targeting the RAS-MAPK in oncogenesis. MiRNAs alterations in human cancers may act as a rheostat of the oncogenic RAS signal that is often amplified as cancers progress. However, specific mechanisms leading to miRNAs deregulation and their functional consequences in cancer are far from being fully elucidated. In this review, we provide an experimental-validated map of RAS-MAPK oncomiRs and tumor suppressor miRNAs from transmembrane receptor to downstream ERK proteins. MiRNAs could be further considered as potential genetic biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, or therapeutic purpose.

Deep intronic hotspot variant unraveling rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome in two patients with atypical teratoid and rhabdoid tumor

About one third of patients with rhabdoid tumors (RT) harbor a heterozygous germline variant in SMARCB1. Molecular diagnosis therefore keeps a crucial place in the diagnosis of RT, and genetic counseling should be systematically recommended. However, immunohistochemistry has progressively replaced molecular tools to assess the status of SMARCB1 in tumors; the necessity of analyzing SMARCB1 status in the tumor may thus be less considered by neuropathologists and pediatric neuro-oncologists. In the present manuscript as aforementioned, we report on two patients with bifocal RT in the first month of life and in whom no germline variant was initially found in the SMARCB1 coding sequence. Careful analysis of SMARCB1 status in the tumors revealed that only one of the two inactivating hits was found in the coding sequence. By sequencing the tumor cells RNA, we were able to detect an insertion with an abnormal sequence, due to the same intronic variant of SMARCB1, which led to the exonisation of the first intron. This cryptic variant was absent in the germline DNA of both patients. Of note, we previously reported one patient with the same deep intronic variant in the germline in a soft tissue RT. To our mind, this additional report on two patients clearly demonstrates that this intronic variant is a new hotspot that should now be systematically added to the germline screening of SMARCB1. We therefore recommend searching for and cautiously interpreting germline analysis if SMARCB1 has not been extensively studied in the tumor.

Embryonic signature distinguishes pediatric and adult rhabdoid tumors from other SMARCB1-deficient cancers

Extra-cranial rhabdoid tumors (RT) are highly aggressive malignancies of infancy, characterized by undifferentiated histological features and loss of SMARCB1 expression. The diagnosis is all the more challenging that other poorly differentiated cancers lose SMARCB1 expression, such as epithelioid sarcomas (ES), renal medullary carcinomas (RMC) or undifferentiated chordomas (UC). Moreover, late cases occurring in adults are now increasingly reported, raising the question of differential diagnoses and emphasizing nosological issues. To address this issue, we have analyzed the expression profiles of a training set of 32 SMARCB1-deficient tumors (SDT), with ascertained diagnosis of RT (n = 16, all < 5 years of age), ES (n = 8, all > 10 years of age), UC (n = 3) and RMC (n = 5). As compared with other SDT, RT are characterized by an embryonic signature, and up-regulation of key-actors of de novo DNA methylation processes. Using this signature, we then analysed the expression profiling of 37 SDT to infer the appropriate diagnosis. Thirteen adult onset tumors showed strong similarity with pediatric RT, in spite of older age; by exome sequencing, these tumors also showed genomic features indistinguishable from pediatric RT. In contrary, 8 tumors were reclassified within carcinoma, ES or UC categories, while the remaining could not be related to any of those entities. Our results demonstrate that embryonic signature is shared by all RT, whatever the age at diagnosis; they also illustrate that many adult-onset SDT of ambiguous histological diagnosis are clearly different from RT. Finally, our study paves the way for the routine use of expression-based signatures to give accurate diagnosis of SDT.

Recurrent extraneural sonic hedgehog medulloblastoma exhibiting sustained response to vismodegib and temozolomide monotherapies and inter-metastatic molecular heterogeneity at progression

Background Response to targeting and non-targeting agents is variable and molecular information remains poorly described in patients with recurrent sonic-hedgehog-driven medulloblastoma (SHH-MB). Materials and Methods Clinical and PET/CT findings during treatment with successive hedgehog antagonists and temozolomide monotherapies are described in a heavily pre-treated patient with recurrent extraneural metastases from PTCH1 mutated/ wild type smoothened (SMO) CNS SHH-MB. Molecular tests were prospectively performed in tissue from two extraneural sites at progression. Results Sustained clinical/metabolic response was obtained to vismodegib. At progression, itraconazole was ineffective, but salvage temozolomide treatment results in a response similar to vismodegib. At further progression, acquired SMO and PIK3CA mutations were identified in bone (G477L and H1047A, respectively) and epidural (L412P and H1065L, respectively) metastases. No response was observed with subsequent sonidegib treatment. Conclusions This is the first clinical report of recurrent extraneural PTCH1 mutated SHH-MB exhibiting: 1) a sustained response to vismodegib and temozolomide, and 2) inter-metastatic molecular heterogeneity and acquired SMO-G477L, SMO-L412P, and PIK3CA-H1065L mutations at progression, highlighting the need for a multitarget treatment approach.