Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt

Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer: A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of integrated positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast for lesion detection and local tumor staging of patients with primary breast cancer in comparison to PET/computed tomography (CT) and MRI. Materials and MethodsThe study was approved by the local institutional review board. Forty-nine patients with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer were prospectively enrolled in our study. All patients underwent a PET/CT, and subsequently, a contrast-enhanced PET/MRI of the breast after written informed consent was obtained before each examination. Two radiologists independently evaluated the corresponding data sets (PET/CT, PET/MRI, and MRI) and were instructed to identify primary tumors lesions as well as multifocal/multicentric and bilateral disease. Furthermore, the occurrence of lymph node metastases was assessed, and the T-stage for each patient was determined. Histopathological verification of the local tumor extent and the axillary lymph node status was available for 30 of 49 and 48 of 49 patients, respectively. For the remaining patients, a consensus characterization was performed for the determination of the T-stage and nodal status, taking into account the results of clinical staging, PET/CT, and PET/MRI examinations. Statistical analysis was performed to test for differences in diagnostic performance between the different imaging procedures. P values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. ResultsPositron emission tomography/MRI and MRI correctly identified 47 (96%) of the 49 patients with primary breast cancer, whereas PET/CT enabled detection of 46 (94%) of 49 breast cancer patients and missed a synchronous carcinoma in the contralateral breast in 1 patient. In a lesion-by-lesion analysis, no significant differences could be obtained between the 3 imaging procedures for the identification of primary breast cancer lesions (P > 0.05). Positron emission tomography/MRI and MRI allowed for a correct identification of multifocal/multicentric disease in 3 additional patients if compared with PET/CT. For the definition of the correct T-stage, PET/MRI and MRI showed identical results and were correct in significantly more cases than PET/CT (PET/MRI and MRI, 82%; PET/CT, 68%; P < 0.05). Furthermore, the calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of nodal positive patients (n = 18) were 78%, 94%, 88%, 88%, and 88% for PET/CT; 67%, 87%, 75%, 82%, and 80% for MRI; and 78%, 90%, 82%, 88%, and 86% for PET/MRI, respectively. Differences between the imaging modalities were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ConclusionsIntegrated PET/MRI does not provide diagnostic advantages for local tumor staging of breast cancer patients in comparison to MRI alone. Positron emission tomography/MRI and MRI enable an improved determination of the local tumor extent in comparison to PET/CT, whereas all 3 imaging modalities offer a comparable diagnostic performance for the identification of axillary disease.

Implementation of FAST-PET/MRI for whole-body staging of female patients with recurrent pelvic malignancies: A comparison to PET/CT

OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic competence of FAST-PET/MRI and PET/CT for whole-body staging of female patients suspect for a recurrence of a pelvic malignancy. METHODS 24 female patients with a suspected tumor recurrence underwent a PET/CT and subsequent PET/MRI examination. For PET/MRI readings a whole-body FAST-protocol was implemented. Two readers separately evaluated the PET/CT and FAST PET/MRI datasets regarding identification of all tumor lesions and qualitative assessment of visual lesion-to-background contrast (4-point ordinal scale). RESULTS Tumor relapse was present in 21 of the 24 patients. Both, PET/CT and PET/MRI allowed for correct identification of tumor recurrence in 20 of 21 cases. Lesion-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of malignant lesions were 82%, 91%, 97%, 58% and 84% for PET/CT and 85%, 87%, 96%, 63% and 86% for PET/MRI, lacking significant differences. Furthermore, no significant difference for lesion-to-background contrast of malignant and benign lesions was found. CONCLUSION FAST-PET/MRI provides a comparably high diagnostic performance for restaging gynecological cancer patients compared to PET/CT with slightly prolonged scan duration, yet enabling a markedly reduced radiation exposure.

Evaluation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CT in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging ((18)F-FDG PET/MRI) with (18)F-FDG PET/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT), MRI, and CT in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-one consecutive patients (age 59.4 ± 11.5 years, range 38.5-76.9 years; 20 female, 1 male) with suspected breast cancer recurrence underwent a clinically indicated (18)F-FDG PET/CT and subsequently a (18)F-FDG PET/MRI examination in a single injection protocol (mean injected activity: 257 ± 44 MBq (18)F-FDG). Each (18)F-FDG PET/MRI, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, as well as the CT component of PET/CT (CTPET/CT) and MR images of PET/MRI (MRIPET/MRI) were separately evaluated by two radiologists regarding lesion count, lesion localization, and lesion categorization (benign/malignant). The reference standard was based on histopathological results as well as prior and follow-up imaging. A Wilcoxon test assessed differences in SUVmax between (18)F-FDG PET/MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Correlation of SUVmax between (18)F-FDG PET/MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT was calculated using Pearsons correlation coefficient. Interobserver agreement on dignity ratings was evaluated using Cohens kappa. RESULTS According to the reference standard, 17 patients had breast cancer recurrence. (18)F-FDG PET/MRI, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and MRIPET/MRI correctly identified each of the 17 patients, whereas CTPET/CT correctly identified 15 of the 17 patients. A total of 134 lesions were described (116 malignant, 18 benign). (18)F-FDG PET/MRI detected all 134 lesions, of which (18)F-FDG PET/CT, MRIPET/MRI, and CTPET/CT detected 97.0%, 96.2%, and 74.6%, respectively. (18)F-FDG PET/MRI yielded the highest proportion of correctly categorized lesions (98.5%) compared with (18)F-FDG PET/CT (94.8%), MRIPET/MRI (88.1%), and CTPET/CT (57.5%). SUVmax was strongly correlated (r=0.72) but measured significantly higher on (18)F-FDG PET/MRI than on (18)F-FDG PET/CT in corresponding PET-positive lesions (SUVmax: 5.6 ± 2.8 vs. 4.9 ± 1.8; p=0.001). Interobserver agreement on lesion dignity was substantial with (18)F-FDG PET/MRI (k=0.65; p<0.001) and (18)F-FDG PET/CT (k=0.65; p<0.001). With MRIPET/MRI interobserver analysis yielded a moderate agreement (k=0.56; p<0.001), whereas there was only fair agreement evaluating the CTPET/CT datasets (k=0.31; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS (18)F-FDG PET/MRI offered the highest diagnostic performance compared with (18)F-FDG PET/CT, MRI and CT. Thus, (18)F-FDG PET/MRI should be regarded as a valuable alternative in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer.

Comparative Performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Detection and Characterization of Pulmonary Lesions in 121 Oncologic Patients.

Our objective was to compare 18F-FDG PET/MRI (performed using a contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed volume-interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]) with 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting and characterizing lung lesions in oncologic patients. Methods: In 121 oncologic patients with 241 lung lesions, PET/MRI was performed after PET/CT in a single-injection protocol (260 ± 58 MBq of 18F-FDG). The detection rates were computed for MRI, the PET component of PET/CT, and the PET component of PET/MRI in relation to the CT component of PET/CT. Wilcoxon testing was used to assess differences in lesion contrast (4-point scale) and size between morphologic datasets and differences in image quality (4-point scale), SUVmean, SUVmax, and characterization (benign/malignant) between PET/MRI and PET/CT. Correlation was determined using the Pearson coefficient (r) for SUV and size and the Spearman rank coefficient (ρ) for contrast. Results: The detection rates for MRI, the PET component of PET/CT, and the PET component of PET/MRI were 66.8%, 42.7%, and 42.3%, respectively. There was a strong correlation in size (r = 0.98) and SUV (r = 0.91) and a moderate correlation in contrast (ρ = 0.48). Image quality was better for PET/CT than for PET/MRI (P < 0.001). Lesion measurements were smaller for MRI than for CT (P < 0.001). SUVmax and SUVmean were significantly higher for PET/MRI than for PET/CT (P < 0.001 each). There was no significant difference in lesion contrast (P = 0.11) or characterization (P = 0.076). Conclusion: In the detection and characterization of lung lesions 10 mm or larger, 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT perform comparably. Lesion size, SUV and characterization correlate strongly between the two modalities. However, the overall detection rate of PET/MRI remains inferior to that of PET/CT because of the limited ability of MRI to detect lesions smaller than 10 mm. Thus, thoracic staging with PET/MRI bears a risk of missing small lung metastases.

Correlation of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) with the Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in Lymph Node Metastases of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Using Hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI

Objective To compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in lymph node metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with standardized uptake values (SUV) derived from combined 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI). Material and Methods 38 patients with histopathologically proven NSCLC (mean age 60.1 ± 9.5y) received whole-body PET/CT (Siemens mCT™) 60min after injection of a mean dose of 280 ± 50 MBq 18F-FDG and subsequent PET/MRI (mean time after tracer injection: 139 ± 26 min, Siemens Biograph mMR). During PET acquisition, simultaneous diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI, b values: 0, 500, 1000 s/mm²) was performed. A maximum of 10 lymph nodes per patient suspicious for malignancy were analyzed. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn covering the entire lymph node on the attenuation-corrected PET-image and the monoexponential ADC-map. According to histopathology or radiological follow-up, lymph nodes were classified as benign or malignant. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated for all lymph node metastases correlating SUVmax and SUVmean with ADCmean. Results A total of 146 suspicious lymph nodes were found in 25 patients. One hundred lymph nodes were eligible for final analysis. Ninety-one lymph nodes were classified as malignant and 9 as benign according to the reference standard. In malignant lesions, mean SUVmax was 9.1 ± 3.8 and mean SUVmean was 6.0 ± 2.5 while mean ADCmean was 877.0 ± 128.6 x10-5 mm²/s in PET/MRI. For all malignant lymph nodes, a weak, inverse correlation between SUVmax and ADCmean as well as SUVmean and ADCmean (r = -0.30, p<0.05 and r = -0.36, p<0.05) existed. Conclusion The present data show a weak inverse correlation between increased glucose-metabolism and cellularity in lymph node metastases of NSCLC patients. 18F-FDG-PET and DWI thus may offer complementary information for the evaluation of treatment response in lymph node metastases of NSCLC.

Evaluation of the Outcome of Lung Nodules Missed on 18F-FDG PET/MRI Compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Known Malignancies

The lower detection rate of 18F-FDG PET/MRI than 18F-FDG PET/CT regarding small lung nodules should be considered in the staging of malignant tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of these small lung nodules missed by 18F-FDG PET/MRI. Methods: Fifty-one oncologic patients (mean age ± SD, 56.6 ± 14.0 y; 29 women, 22 men; tumor stages, I [n = 7], II [n = 7], III [n = 9], IV [n = 28]) who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent 18F-FDG PET/MRI on the same day were retrospectively enrolled. Images were analyzed by 2 interpreters in random order and separate sessions with a minimum of 4 wk apart. A maximum of 10 lung nodules was identified for each patient on baseline imaging. The presence, size, and presence of focal tracer uptake was noted for each lung nodule detected on 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/MRI using a postcontrast T1-weighted 3-dimensional gradient echo volume-interpolated breath-hold examination sequence with fat suppression as morphologic dataset. Follow-up CT or 18F-FDG PET/CT (mean time to follow-up, 11 mo; range, 3–35 mo) was used as a reference standard to define each missed nodule as benign or malignant based on changes in size and potential new tracer uptake. Nodule-to-nodule comparison between baseline and follow-up was performed using descriptive statistics. Results: Out of 134 lung nodules found on 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/MRI detected 92 nodules. Accordingly, 42 lung nodules (average size ± SD, 3.9 ± 1.3 mm; range, 2–7 mm) were missed by 18F-FDG PET/MRI. None of the missed lung nodules presented with focal tracer uptake on baseline imaging or follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT. Thirty-three out of 42 missed lung nodules (78.6%) in 26 patients were rated benign, whereas 9 nodules (21.4%) in 4 patients were rated malignant. As a result, 1 patient required upstaging from tumor stage I to IV. Conclusion: Although most small lung nodules missed on 18F-FDG PET/MRI were found to be benign, there was a relevant number of undetected metastases. However, in patients with advanced tumor stages the clinical impact remains controversial as upstaging is usually more relevant in lower stages.

Optimization of Acquisition time of 68Ga-PSMA-Ligand PET/MRI in Patients with Local and Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Objective The aim of this optimization study was to minimize the acquisition time of 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in patients with local and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) to obtain a sufficient image quality and quantification accuracy without any appreciable loss. Methods Twenty patients with PCa were administered intravenously with the 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA ligand (mean activity 99 MBq/patient, range 76–148 MBq) and subsequently underwent PET/MRI at, on average, 168 min (range 77–320 min) after injection. PET and MR imaging data were acquired simultaneously. PET acquisition was performed in list mode and PET images were reconstructed at different time intervals (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min). Data were analyzed regarding radiotracer uptake in tumors and muscle tissue and PET image quality. Tumor uptake was quantified in terms of the maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean) within a spherical volume of interest (VOI). Reference VOIs were drawn in the gluteus maximus muscle on the right side. PET image quality was evaluated by experienced nuclear physicians/radiologists using a five-point ordinal scale from 5–1 (excellent—insufficient). Results Lesion detectability linearly increased with increasing acquisition times, reaching its maximum at PET acquisition times of 4 min. At this image acquisition time, tumor lesions in 19/20 (95%) patients were detected. PET image quality showed a positive correlation with increasing acquisition time, reaching a plateau at 4–6 min image acquisition. Both SUVmax and SUVmean correlated inversely with acquisition time and reached a plateau at acquisition times after 4 min. Conclusion In the applied image acquisition settings, the optimal acquisition time of 68Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/MRI in patients with local and metastatic PCa was identified to be 4 min per bed position. At this acquisition time, PET image quality and lesion detectability reach a maximum while SUVmax and SUVmean do not change significantly beyond this time point.

Evaluation of a Fast Protocol for Staging Lymphoma Patients with Integrated PET/MRI

Background The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of a fast MR-protocol for whole-body staging of lymphoma patients using an integrated PET/MR system. Methods A total of 48 consecutive lymphoma patients underwent 52 clinically indicated PET/CT and subsequent PET/MRI examinations with the use of 18F-FDG. For PET/MR imaging, a fast whole-body MR-protocol was implemented. A radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician interpreted MRI and PET/MRI datasets in consensus and were instructed to identify manifestations of lymphoma on a site-specific analysis. The accuracy for the identification of active lymphoma disease was calculated and the tumor stage for each examination was determined. Furthermore, radiation doses derived from administered tracer activities and CT protocol parameters were estimated and the mean scan duration of PET/CT and PET/MR imaging was determined. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance of PET/MRI and MRI alone. The results of PET/CT imaging, all available histopathological samples as well as results of prior examinations and follow-up imaging were used for the determination of the reference standard. Results Active lymphoma disease was present in 28/52 examinations. PET/MRI revealed higher values of diagnostic accuracy for the identification of active lymphoma disease in those 52 examinations in comparison to MRI, however, results of the two ratings did not differ significantly. On a site specific analysis, PET/MRI showed a significantly higher accuracy for the identification of nodal manifestation of lymphoma (p<0.05) if compared to MRI, whereas ratings for extranodal regions did not reveal a significant difference. In addition, PET/MRI enabled correct identification of lymphoma stage in a higher percentage of patients than MRI (94% vs. 83%). Furthermore, SUVs derived from PET/MRI were significantly higher than in PET/CT, however, there was a strong positive correlation between SUVmax and SUVmean of the two imaging modalities (R = 0.91 p<0.001 and R = 0.87, p<0.001). Average scan duration of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI examinations amounted to 17.3±1.9 min and 27.8±3.7 min, respectively. Estimated mean effective-dose for whole-body PET/CT scans were 64.4% higher than for PET/MRI. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET data as a valuable additive to MRI for a more accurate evaluation of patients with lymphomas. With regard to patient comfort related to scan duration and a markedly reduced radiation exposure, fast PET/MRI may serve as a powerful alternative to PET/CT for a diagnostic workup of lymphoma patients.

Oncological whole-body staging in integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR: Value of different MR sequences for simultaneous PET and MR reading

OBJECTIVE To evaluate different magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences in integrated positron emission tomography (PET)/MR concerning their ability to detect tumors and allocate increased radionuclide uptake on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) PET in intraindividual comparison with computed tomography (CT) from PET/CT. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty-one patients (34 female, 27 male, mean age 57.6 y) who were examined with contrast-enhanced PET/CT and subsequent PET/MR (mean delay for PET/MR after injection: 147 ± 43 min) were included. A maximum of ten (18)F-FDG-avid lesions per patient were analyzed on CT from PET/CT and with the following MR sequences from PET/MR: T2, turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM), non-enhanced T1, contrast-enhanced T1, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). All lesions were rated using a four-point ordinal scale (scored from 0 to 3) concerning visual detectability of the lesion against the surrounding background and anatomical allocation of the PET finding. In each category (detectability and allocation), Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed. Bonferroni-Holm correction was performed to prevent α-error accumulation. RESULTS In 225 (18)F-FDG-avid lesions (156 confirmed as malignant by radiological follow up, 69 by histopathology), visual detectability was comparably high on CT (mean: 2.5 ± 0.9), TIRM (mean: 2.5 ± 0.9), T2 (mean: 2.4 ± 0.9), and DWI (mean: 2.5 ± 1.0) and was significantly higher than on non-enhanced T1 (mean: 2.2 ± 1.0). While anatomic allocation of the PET finding was comparable with CT (mean: 2.6 ± 0.7), T2 (mean: 2.6 ± 0.7), and TIRM (mean: 2.8 ± 0.7), it was significantly higher compared to DWI (mean: 2.1 ± 1.0) and non-enhanced T1 (mean: 2.4 ± 0.8). CONCLUSION In conclusion, T2, TIRM, and contrast-enhanced T1 provide a high quality of lesion detectability and anatomical allocation of FDG-avid foci. Their performance is at least comparable to contrast-enhanced PET/CT. Non-enhanced T1 may be omitted and the necessity of DWI should be further investigated for specific questions, such as assessment of the liver.

Does 18F-FDG PET/MRI reduce the number of indeterminate abdominal incidentalomas compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT?

ObjectiveIncidental masses of abdominal organs are a relevant problem in radiological examinations. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether simultaneous 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/MRI, because of its higher soft-tissue contrast and the diversity of available pulse sequences, can reduce the number of indeterminate abdominal incidentalomas compared with 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT). Materials and methodsIn this retrospective study, we enrolled 173 patients (91 women and 82 men, mean age 55.8±14.6 years) who underwent contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT on the same day for oncological indications. Data sets were examined in a random order by two readers noting incidentalomas and incidental tracer uptake of the liver, kidneys, spleen, pancreas, adrenal glands, and gallbladder. Findings were categorized into three categories: most likely malignant, indeterminate, and most likely benign. In addition, the most relevant MR sequence for the final decision was recorded for each incidentaloma. The numbers of benign, indeterminate, and malignant findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/MRI were compared. A subgroup analysis was carried out to detect potential differences with respect to lesion location (organwise) and lesion consistency (solid vs. cystic). ResultsA total of 649 upper abdominal incidentalomas were found. 18F-FDG PET/MRI detected more incidentalomas (n=635) than contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT (n=407, P<0.001). Using 18F-FDG PET/MRI, significantly fewer incidentalomas were categorized as indeterminate compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT (n=27 vs. 91, P<0.001). This was true for cystic (P<0.001) as well as solid masses (P<0.001). Seventy incidentalomas categorized as indeterminate on contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT could be clarified as most likely benign by 18F-FDG PET/MRI, whereas only six lesions rated as benign by 18F-FDG PET/CT were classified as indeterminate in 18F-FDG PET/MRI. 18F-FDG PET/MRI compared with contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT had significantly fewer indeterminate findings in the liver (P<0.001), kidneys (P=0.012), and adrenal glands (P=0.002); differences for the spleen (P=0.5) were not significant. Conclusion18F-FDG PET/MRI identifies more incidentalomas than 18F-FDG PET/CT, but significantly reduces the number of indeterminate incidental findings of abdominal organs.