Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Emanuel Gloor is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Emanuel Gloor.


Science | 2009

Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest

Oliver L. Phillips; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Simon L. Lewis; Joshua B. Fisher; Jon Lloyd; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Yadvinder Malhi; Abel Monteagudo; J. Peacock; Carlos A. Quesada; Geertje M.F. van der Heijden; Samuel Almeida; Iêda Leão do Amaral; Luzmila Arroyo; Gerardo Aymard; Timothy R. Baker; Olaf Banki; Lilian Blanc; Damien Bonal; Paulo M. Brando; Jérôme Chave; Atila Alves de Oliveira; Nallaret Dávila Cardozo; Claudia I. Czimczik; Ted R. Feldpausch; Maria Aparecida Freitas; Emanuel Gloor; Niro Higuchi; Eliana M. Jimenez; Gareth Lloyd

Amazon forests are a key but poorly understood component of the global carbon cycle. If, as anticipated, they dry this century, they might accelerate climate change through carbon losses and changed surface energy balances. We used records from multiple long-term monitoring plots across Amazonia to assess forest responses to the intense 2005 drought, a possible analog of future events. Affected forest lost biomass, reversing a large long-term carbon sink, with the greatest impacts observed where the dry season was unusually intense. Relative to pre-2005 conditions, forest subjected to a 100-millimeter increase in water deficit lost 5.3 megagrams of aboveground biomass of carbon per hectare. The drought had a total biomass carbon impact of 1.2 to 1.6 petagrams (1.2 × 1015 to 1.6 × 1015 grams). Amazon forests therefore appear vulnerable to increasing moisture stress, with the potential for large carbon losses to exert feedback on climate change.


New Phytologist | 2010

Drought–mortality relationships for tropical forests

Oliver L. Phillips; Geertje M.F. van der Heijden; Simon L. Lewis; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Jon Lloyd; Yadvinder Malhi; Abel Monteagudo; Samuel Almeida; Esteban Álvarez Dávila; Iêda Leão do Amaral; Sandy Andelman; Ana Andrade; Luzmila Arroyo; Gerardo Aymard; Timothy R. Baker; Lilian Blanc; Damien Bonal; Atila Alves de Oliveira; Kuo-Jung Chao; Nallaret Dávila Cardozo; Lola Da Costa; Ted R. Feldpausch; Joshua B. Fisher; Nikolaos M. Fyllas; Maria Aparecida Freitas; David Galbraith; Emanuel Gloor; Niro Higuchi; Eurídice N. Honorio

*The rich ecology of tropical forests is intimately tied to their moisture status. Multi-site syntheses can provide a macro-scale view of these linkages and their susceptibility to changing climates. Here, we report pan-tropical and regional-scale analyses of tree vulnerability to drought. *We assembled available data on tropical forest tree stem mortality before, during, and after recent drought events, from 119 monitoring plots in 10 countries concentrated in Amazonia and Borneo. *In most sites, larger trees are disproportionately at risk. At least within Amazonia, low wood density trees are also at greater risk of drought-associated mortality, independent of size. For comparable drought intensities, trees in Borneo are more vulnerable than trees in the Amazon. There is some evidence for lagged impacts of drought, with mortality rates remaining elevated 2 yr after the meteorological event is over. *These findings indicate that repeated droughts would shift the functional composition of tropical forests toward smaller, denser-wooded trees. At very high drought intensities, the linear relationship between tree mortality and moisture stress apparently breaks down, suggesting the existence of moisture stress thresholds beyond which some tropical forests would suffer catastrophic tree mortality.


Nature | 2015

Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink

Roel J. W. Brienen; Oliver L. Phillips; Ted R. Feldpausch; Emanuel Gloor; Timothy R. Baker; Jon Lloyd; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Abel Monteagudo-Mendoza; Yadvinder Malhi; Simon L. Lewis; R. Vásquez Martínez; Miguel Alexiades; E. Álvarez Dávila; Patricia Alvarez-Loayza; Ana Andrade; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami; E.J.M.M. Arets; Luzmila Arroyo; Olaf S. Bánki; Christopher Baraloto; Jorcely Barroso; Damien Bonal; Rene G. A. Boot; José Luís C. Camargo; Carolina V. Castilho; V. Chama; Kuo-Jung Chao; Jérôme Chave; James A. Comiskey

Atmospheric carbon dioxide records indicate that the land surface has acted as a strong global carbon sink over recent decades, with a substantial fraction of this sink probably located in the tropics, particularly in the Amazon. Nevertheless, it is unclear how the terrestrial carbon sink will evolve as climate and atmospheric composition continue to change. Here we analyse the historical evolution of the biomass dynamics of the Amazon rainforest over three decades using a distributed network of 321 plots. While this analysis confirms that Amazon forests have acted as a long-term net biomass sink, we find a long-term decreasing trend of carbon accumulation. Rates of net increase in above-ground biomass declined by one-third during the past decade compared to the 1990s. This is a consequence of growth rate increases levelling off recently, while biomass mortality persistently increased throughout, leading to a shortening of carbon residence times. Potential drivers for the mortality increase include greater climate variability, and feedbacks of faster growth on mortality, resulting in shortened tree longevity. The observed decline of the Amazon sink diverges markedly from the recent increase in terrestrial carbon uptake at the global scale, and is contrary to expectations based on models.


Biological Reviews | 2014

Environmental change and the carbon balance of Amazonian forests

Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Benjamin Poulter; Jos Barlow; Liana O. Anderson; Yadvinder Malhi; Sassan Saatchi; Oliver L. Phillips; Emanuel Gloor

Extreme climatic events and land‐use change are known to influence strongly the current carbon cycle of Amazonia, and have the potential to cause significant global climate impacts. This review intends to evaluate the effects of both climate and anthropogenic perturbations on the carbon balance of the Brazilian Amazon and to understand how they interact with each other. By analysing the outputs of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Report 4 (AR4) model ensemble, we demonstrate that Amazonian temperatures and water stress are both likely to increase over the 21st Century. Curbing deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon by 62% in 2010 relative to the 1990s mean decreased the Brazilian Amazons deforestation contribution to global land use carbon emissions from 17% in the 1990s and early 2000s to 9% by 2010. Carbon sources in Amazonia are likely to be dominated by climatic impacts allied with forest fires (48.3% relative contribution) during extreme droughts. The current net carbon sink (net biome productivity, NBP) of +0.16 (ranging from +0.11 to +0.21) Pg C year−1 in the Brazilian Amazon, equivalent to 13.3% of global carbon emissions from land‐use change for 2008, can be negated or reversed during drought years [NBP = −0.06 (−0.31 to +0.01) Pg C year−1]. Therefore, reducing forest fires, in addition to reducing deforestation, would be an important measure for minimizing future emissions. Conversely, doubling the current area of secondary forests and avoiding additional removal of primary forests would help the Amazonian gross forest sink to offset approximately 42% of global land‐use change emissions. We conclude that a few strategic environmental policy measures are likely to strengthen the Amazonian net carbon sink with global implications. Moreover, these actions could increase the resilience of the net carbon sink to future increases in drought frequency.


Trends in Plant Science | 2013

Detecting trends in tree growth: not so simple

David M. J. S. Bowman; Roel J. W. Brienen; Emanuel Gloor; Oliver L. Phillips; Lynda D. Prior

Tree biomass influences biogeochemical cycles, climate, and biodiversity across local to global scales. Understanding the environmental control of tree biomass demands consideration of the drivers of individual tree growth over their lifespan. This can be achieved by studies of tree growth in permanent sample plots (prospective studies) and tree ring analyses (retrospective studies). However, identification of growth trends and attribution of their drivers demands statistical control of the axiomatic co-variation of tree size and age, and avoiding sampling biases at the stand, forest, and regional scales. Tracking and predicting the effects of environmental change on tree biomass requires well-designed studies that address the issues that we have reviewed.


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2016

Rising atmospheric methane: 2007-2014 growth and isotopic shift

Euan G. Nisbet; E. J. Dlugokencky; Martin R. Manning; D. Lowry; R. E. Fisher; Sylvia E. Michel; J. B. Miller; James W. C. White; Bruce H. Vaughn; P. Bousquet; J. A. Pyle; N. J. Warwick; M. Cain; Rebecca Brownlow; G. Zazzeri; M. Lanoisellé; Andrew C. Manning; Emanuel Gloor; Douglas E. J. Worthy; E.-G. Brunke; C. Labuschagne; Eric W. Wolff; Anita L. Ganesan

From 2007 to 2013, the globally averaged mole fraction of methane in the atmosphere increased by 5.7 ± 1.2 ppb yr−1. Simultaneously, δ13CCH4 (a measure of the 13C/12C isotope ratio in methane) has shifted to significantly more negative values since 2007. Growth was extreme in 2014, at 12.5 ± 0.4 ppb, with a further shift to more negative values being observed at most latitudes. The isotopic evidence presented here suggests that the methane rise was dominated by significant increases in biogenic methane emissions, particularly in the tropics, for example, from expansion of tropical wetlands in years with strongly positive rainfall anomalies or emissions from increased agricultural sources such as ruminants and rice paddies. Changes in the removal rate of methane by the OH radical have not been seen in other tracers of atmospheric chemistry and do not appear to explain short-term variations in methane. Fossil fuel emissions may also have grown, but the sustained shift to more 13C-depleted values and its significant interannual variability, and the tropical and Southern Hemisphere loci of post-2007 growth, both indicate that fossil fuel emissions have not been the dominant factor driving the increase. A major cause of increased tropical wetland and tropical agricultural methane emissions, the likely major contributors to growth, may be their responses to meteorological change.


Global Change Biology | 2014

Perturbations in the carbon budget of the tropics

John Grace; Edward T. A. Mitchard; Emanuel Gloor

The carbon budget of the tropics has been perturbed as a result of human influences. Here, we attempt to construct a ‘bottom-up’ analysis of the biological components of the budget as they are affected by human activities. There are major uncertainties in the extent and carbon content of different vegetation types, the rates of land-use change and forest degradation, but recent developments in satellite remote sensing have gone far towards reducing these uncertainties. Stocks of carbon as biomass in tropical forests and woodlands add up to 271 ± 16 Pg with an even greater quantity of carbon as soil organic matter. Carbon loss from deforestation, degradation, harvesting and peat fires is estimated as 2.01 ± 1.1 Pg annum−1; while carbon gain from forest and woodland growth is 1.85 ± 0.09 Pg annum−1. We conclude that tropical lands are on average a small carbon source to the atmosphere, a result that is consistent with the ‘top-down’ result from measurements in the atmosphere. If they were to be conserved, they would be a substantial carbon sink. Release of carbon as carbon dioxide from fossil fuel burning in the tropics is 0.74 Pg annum−1 or 0.57 MgC person−1 annum−1, much lower than the corresponding figures from developed regions of the world.


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2016

Amazon forest response to repeated droughts

Ted R. Feldpausch; Oliver L. Phillips; Roel J. W. Brienen; Emanuel Gloor; Jon Lloyd; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Abel Monteagudo-Mendoza; Yadvinder Malhi; A. Alarcón; E. Álvarez Dávila; Patricia Alvarez-Loayza; Ana Andrade; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Luzmila Arroyo; Timothy R. Baker; Christopher Baraloto; Jorcely Barroso; Damien Bonal; Wendeson Castro; V. Chama; Jérôme Chave; Tomas F. Domingues; Sophie Fauset; Nikée Groot; E.N. Honorio Coronado; Susan G. Laurance; William F. Laurance; Simon L. Lewis; J. C. Licona; Beatriz Schwantes Marimon

The Amazon Basin has experienced more variable climate over the last decade, with a severe and widespread drought in 2005 causing large basin-wide losses of biomass. A drought of similar climatological magnitude occurred again in 2010; however, there has been no basin-wide ground-based evaluation of effects on vegetation. We examine to what extent the 2010 drought affected forest dynamics using ground-based observations of mortality and growth from an extensive forest plot network. We find that during the 2010 drought interval, forests did not gain biomass (net change: −0.43 Mg ha−1, confidence interval (CI): −1.11, 0.19, n = 97), regardless of whether forests experienced precipitation deficit anomalies. This contrasted with a long-term biomass sink during the baseline pre-2010 drought period (1998 to pre-2010) of 1.33 Mg ha−1 yr−1 (CI: 0.90, 1.74, p < 0.01). The resulting net impact of the 2010 drought (i.e., reversal of the baseline net sink) was −1.95 Mg ha−1 yr−1 (CI:−2.77, −1.18; p < 0.001). This net biomass impact was driven by an increase in biomass mortality (1.45 Mg ha−1 yr−1 CI: 0.66, 2.25, p < 0.001) and a decline in biomass productivity (−0.50 Mg ha−1 yr−1, CI:−0.78, −0.31; p < 0.001). Surprisingly, the magnitude of the losses through tree mortality was unrelated to estimated local precipitation anomalies and was independent of estimated local pre-2010 drought history. Thus, there was no evidence that pre-2010 droughts compounded the effects of the 2010 drought. We detected a systematic basin-wide impact of the 2010 drought on tree growth rates across Amazonia, which was related to the strength of the moisture deficit. This impact differed from the drought event in 2005 which did not affect productivity. Based on these ground data, live biomass in trees and corresponding estimates of live biomass in lianas and roots, we estimate that intact forests in Amazonia were carbon neutral in 2010 (−0.07 Pg C yr−1 CI:−0.42, 0.23), consistent with results from an independent analysis of airborne estimates of land-atmospheric fluxes during 2010. Relative to the long-term mean, the 2010 drought resulted in a reduction in biomass carbon uptake of 1.1 Pg C, compared to 1.6 Pg C for the 2005 event.


Ecology Letters | 2014

Fast demographic traits promote high diversification rates of Amazonian trees

Timothy R. Baker; R. Toby Pennington; Susana Magallón; Emanuel Gloor; William F. Laurance; Miguel Alexiades; Esteban Álvarez; Alejandro Araujo; E.J.M.M. Arets; Gerardo Aymard; Atila Alves de Oliveira; Iêda Leão do Amaral; Luzmila Arroyo; Damien Bonal; Roel J. W. Brienen; Jérôme Chave; Kyle G. Dexter; Anthony Di Fiore; Eduardo Eler; Ted R. Feldpausch; Leandro V. Ferreira; Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez; Geertje M.F. van der Heijden; Niro Higuchi; Eurídice N. Honorio; Isau Huamantupa; Timothy J. Killeen; Susan G. Laurance; Claudio Leaño; Simon L. Lewis

The Amazon rain forest sustains the worlds highest tree diversity, but it remains unclear why some clades of trees are hyperdiverse, whereas others are not. Using dated phylogenies, estimates of current species richness and trait and demographic data from a large network of forest plots, we show that fast demographic traits – short turnover times – are associated with high diversification rates across 51 clades of canopy trees. This relationship is robust to assuming that diversification rates are either constant or decline over time, and occurs in a wide range of Neotropical tree lineages. This finding reveals the crucial role of intrinsic, ecological variation among clades for understanding the origin of the remarkable diversity of Amazonian trees and forests.


Biological Reviews | 2011

Using learning networks to understand complex systems: a case study of biological, geophysical and social research in the Amazon

Jane Barlow; Robert M. Ewers; Lynda Anderson; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Timothy R. Baker; Emily Boyd; Ted R. Feldpausch; Emanuel Gloor; Anthony Hall; Yadvinder Malhi; William Milliken; Mark Mulligan; Luke Parry; Toby Pennington; Camila Alves Peres; Oliver L. Phillips; Rosa Maria Roman-Cuesta; Joseph A. Tobias; Toby A. Gardner

Developing high‐quality scientific research will be most effective if research communities with diverse skills and interests are able to share information and knowledge, are aware of the major challenges across disciplines, and can exploit economies of scale to provide robust answers and better inform policy. We evaluate opportunities and challenges facing the development of a more interactive research environment by developing an interdisciplinary synthesis of research on a single geographic region. We focus on the Amazon as it is of enormous regional and global environmental importance and faces a highly uncertain future. To take stock of existing knowledge and provide a framework for analysis we present a set of mini‐reviews from fourteen different areas of research, encompassing taxonomy, biodiversity, biogeography, vegetation dynamics, landscape ecology, earth‐atmosphere interactions, ecosystem processes, fire, deforestation dynamics, hydrology, hunting, conservation planning, livelihoods, and payments for ecosystem services. Each review highlights the current state of knowledge and identifies research priorities, including major challenges and opportunities. We show that while substantial progress is being made across many areas of scientific research, our understanding of specific issues is often dependent on knowledge from other disciplines. Accelerating the acquisition of reliable and contextualized knowledge about the fate of complex pristine and modified ecosystems is partly dependent on our ability to exploit economies of scale in shared resources and technical expertise, recognise and make explicit interconnections and feedbacks among sub‐disciplines, increase the temporal and spatial scale of existing studies, and improve the dissemination of scientific findings to policy makers and society at large. Enhancing interaction among research efforts is vital if we are to make the most of limited funds and overcome the challenges posed by addressing large‐scale interdisciplinary questions. Bringing together a diverse scientific community with a single geographic focus can help increase awareness of research questions both within and among disciplines, and reveal the opportunities that may exist for advancing acquisition of reliable knowledge. This approach could be useful for a variety of globally important scientific questions.

Collaboration


Dive into the Emanuel Gloor's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jon Lloyd

Imperial College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge