Florent Vautrin

3D Mask modeling with Oblique incidence and Mask Corner rounding effects for the 32nm node

The perpetual shrinking in critical dimensions in semiconductor devices is driving the need for increased resolution in optical lithography. Increasing NA to gain resolution also increases Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) model complexity. Some optical effects which have been completely neglected in OPC modeling become important. Over the past few years, off-axis illumination has been widely used to improve the imaging process. OPC models which utilize such illumination still use the thin film mask approximation (Kirchhoff approach), during optical model generation, which utilizes a normal incidence. However, simulating a three dimensional mask near-field using an off-axis illumination requires OPC models to introduce oblique incidence. In addition, the use of higher NA systems introduces high obliquity field components that can no longer be assimilated as normal incident waves. The introduction of oblique incidence requires other effects, such as corner rounding of mask features, to be considered, that are seldom taken into account in OPC modeling. In this paper, the effects of oblique incidence and corner rounding of mask features on resist contours of 2D structures (i.e. line-ends and corners) are studied. Rigorous electromagnetic simulations are performed to investigate the scattering properties of various lithographic 32nm node mask structures. Simulations are conducted using a three dimensional phase shift mask topology and an off-axis illumination at high NA. Aerial images are calculated and compared with those obtained from a classical normal incidence illumination. The benefits of using an oblique incidence to improve hot-spot prediction will be discussed.

Three-dimensional mask effects and source polarization impact on OPC model accuracy and process window

As semiconductor technology moves toward and beyond the 65 nm lithography node, the importance of Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) models grows due to the lithographers need to ensure high fidelity in the mask- to-silicon transfer. This, in turn, causes OPC model complexity to increase as NA increases and minimum feature size on the mask decreases. Subtle effects, that were considered insignificant, can no longer be ignored. Depending on the imaging system, three dimensional mask effects need to be included in OPC modeling. These effects can be used to improve model accuracy and to better predict the final process window. In this paper, the effects of 3D mask topology on process window are studied using several 45 nm node mask structure types. Simulations are conducted with and without a polarized illumination source. The benefits of using an advanced model algorithm, that comprehends 3D mask effects, will be discussed. To quantify the potential impact of this methodology, relative to current best known practices, all results are compared to those obtained from a model using a conventional thin film mask.

Implementation of silicon-validated variability analysis and optimization for standard cell libraries

Leveraging silicon validation, a model-based variability analysis has been implemented to detect sensitivity to systematic variations in standard cell libraries using a model-based solution, to reduce performance spread at the cell level and chip level. First, a simulation methodology to predict changes in circuit characteristics due to systematic lithography and etch effects is described and validated in silicon. This methodology relies on these two foundations: 1) A physical shape model predicts contours from drawn layout; 2) An electrical device model, which captures narrow width effects, accurately reproduces drive currents of transistors based on silicon contours. The electrical model, combined with accurate lithographic contour simulation, is used to account for systematic variations due to optical proximity effects and to update an existing circuit netlist to give accurate delay and leakage calculations. After a thorough validation, the contour-based simulation is used at the cell level to analyze and reduce the sensitivity of standard cells to their layout context. Using a random context generation, the contour-based simulation is applied to each cell of the library across multiple contexts and litho process conditions, identifying systematic shape variations due to proximity effects and process variations and determining their impact on cell delay. This methodology is used in the flow of cell library design to identify cells with high sensitivity to proximity effects and consequently, large variation in delay and leakage. The contour-based circuit netlist can also be used to perform accurate contour-based cell characterization and provide more silicon-accurate timing in the chip-design flow. A cell-variability index (CVI) can also be derived from the cell-level analysis to provide valuable information to chip-level design optimization tools to reduce overall variability and performance spread of integrated circuits at 65nm and below.

Study of SRAF placement for contact at 45 nm and 32 nm node

At 45 and 32 nm nodes, one of the most critical layers is the Contact one. Due to the use of hyper NA imaging, the depth of focus starts to be very limited. Moreover the OPC is rapidly limited because of the increase of the pattern density. The limited surface in the dark field region of a Contact layer mask enforces the edges movement to stop very quickly. The use of SRAF (Sub Resolution Assist Feature) has been widely use for DOF enhancement of line and space layers since many technology node. Recently, SRAF generated using inverse lithography have shown interesting DOF improvement1. However, the advantage of the ideal mask generated by inverse lithography is lost when switching to a manufacturable mask with Manhattan structures. For SRAF placed in rule based as well as Manhattan SRAF generated after inverse lithography, it is important to know what their behavior is, in term of size and placement. In this article we propose to study the placement of scatter-trenches assist features for the contact layer. For this we have performed process window simulation with different SRAF sizes and distance to the main OPC. These results permit us to establish the trends for size and placement of the SRAF. Moreover we have also take a look of the advantages of using 8 surrounding SRAF (4 in vertical - horizontal and 4 at 45°) versus 4 surrounding SRAF. Based on these studies we have seen that there is no real gain of increasing the complexity by adding additional SRAF.

Model-based mask verification

One of the most critical points for accurate OPC is to have accurate models that properly simulate the full process from the mask fractured data to the etched remaining structures on the wafer. In advanced technology nodes, the CD error budget becomes so tight that it is becoming critical to improve modeling accuracy. Current technology models used for OPC generation and verification are mostly composed of an optical model, a resist model and sometimes an etch model. The mask contribution is nominally accounted for in the optical and resist portions of these models. Mask processing has become ever more complex throughout the years so properly modeling this portion of the process has the potential to improve the overall modeling accuracy. Also, measuring and tracking individual mask parameters such as CD bias can potentially improve wafer yields by detecting hotspots caused by individual mask characteristics. In this paper, we will show results of a new approach that incorporates mask process modeling. We will also show results of testing a new dynamic mask bias application used during OPC verification.

Characterization of inverse SRAF for active layer trenches on 45-nm node

Patterning isolated trenches for bright field layers such as the active layer has always been difficult for lithographers. This patterning is even more challenging for advanced technologies such as the 45-nm node where most of the process optimization is done for minimum pitch dense lines. Similar to the use of scattering-bars to assist isolated lines structures, we can use inverse Sub Resolution Assist Features (SRAF) to assist the patterning of isolated trenches structures. Full characterization studies on the C45 Active layer demonstrate the benefits and potential issues of this technique: Screen Inverse SRAF parameters (size, distance to main feature) utilizing optical simulation; Verify simulation predictions and ensure sufficient improvement in Depth of Focus and Exposure latitude with silicon process window analysis; Define Inverse SRAF OPC generation script parameters and validate, with accurate on silicon, measurement characterization of specific test patterns; Maskshop manufacturability through CD measurements and inspection capability. Finally, initial silicon results from a 45nm mask are given with suggestions for additional optimization of inverse SRAF for trenches.

32-nm SOC printing with double patterning, regular design, and 1.2 NA immersion scanner

Resolution Enhancement Techniques (RET) are inherently design dependent technologies. To be successful the RET strategy needs to be adapted to the type of circuit desired. For SOC (system on chip), the three main patterning constraints come from: -Static RAM with very aggressive design rules specially at active, poly and contact -transistor variability control at the chip level -random layouts The development of regular layouts, within the framework of DFM, enables the use of more aggressive RET, pushing the required k1 factor further than allowed with existing RET techniques and the current wavelength and NA limitations. Besides that, it is shown that the primary appeal of regular design usage comes from the significant decrease in transistor variability. In 45nm technology a more than 80% variability reduction for the width and the length of the transistor at best conditions, and more than 50% variability reduction though the process window has been demonstrated. In addition, line-end control in the SRAM bitcell becomes a key challenge for the 32nm node. Taking all these constraints into account, we present the existing best patterning strategy for active and poly level of 32nm : -dipole with polarization and regular layout for active level -dipole with polarization, regular layout and double patterning to cut the line-end for poly level. These choices have been made based on the printing performances of a 0.17&mgr;m2 SRAM bitcell and a 32nm flip-flop with NA 1.2 immersion scanner.

Impact of modelisation pixel size on OPC consistency

In advanced technology nodes, due to accuracy and computing time constraint, OPC has shifted from discrete simulation to pixel based simulation. The simulation is grid based and then interpolation occurs between grid points. Even if the sampling is done below Nyquist rate, interpolation can cause some variations for same polygon placed at different location in the layout. Any variation is rounded during OPC treatment, because of discrete numbers used in OPC output file. The end result is inconsistency in post-OPC layout, where the same input polygon will give different outputs, depending on its position and orientation relative to the grid. This can have a major impact in CD control, in structures like SRAM for example, where mismatching between gates can cause major issue. There are some workarounds to minimize this effect, but most of them are post-treatment fix. In this paper, we will try to identify and solve the root cause of the problem. We will study the relationship between the pixel size and the consistency of post OPC results. The pixel size is often set based on optical parameters, but it might be possible to optimize it around this value to avoid inconsistency. One can say that the optimization will highly depend on design and not be possible for a real layout. As the range of pitch used in a design tends to decrease, thanks to fix pitch layouts, we may optimize pixel size for a full layout.

OPC Structures for Maskshops Qualification for the CMOS65nm and CMOS45nm Nodes

Several qualification stages are required for new maskshop tools, first step is done by the maskshop internally. Taking a new writer for example, the maskshop will review the basic factory and site acceptance tests, including CD uniformity, CD linearity, local CD errors and registration errors. The second step is to have dedicated OPC (Optical Proximity Correction) structures from the wafer fab. These dedicated OPC structures will be measured by the maskshop to get a reticle CD metrology trend line. With this trend line, we can: - ensure the stability at reticle level of the maskshop processes - put in place a matching procedure to guarantee the same OPC signature at reticle level in case of any internal maskshop process change or new maskshop evaluation. Changes that require qualification could be process changes for capacity reasons, like introducing a new writer or a new manufacturing line, or for capability reasons, like a new process (new developer tool for example) introduction. Most advanced levels will have dedicated OPC structures. Also dedicated maskshop processes will be monitored with these specific OPC structures. In this paper, we will follow in detail the different reticle CD measurements of dedicated OPC structures for the three advanced logic levels of the 65nm node: poly level, contact level and metal level. The related maskshops processes are - for poly: eaPSM 193nm with a nega CAR (Chemically Amplified Resist) process for Clear Field L/S (Lines & Space) reticles - for contact: eaPSM 193nm with a posi CAR process for Dark Field Holes reticles - for metal1: eaPSM 193nm with a posi CAR process for Dark Field L/S reticles. For all these structures, CD linearity, CD through pitch, length effects, and pattern density effects will be monitored. To average the metrology errors, the structures are placed twice on the reticle. The first part of this paper will describe the different OPC structures. These OPC structures are close to the DRM (Design Rule Manual) of the dedicated levels to be monitored. The second part of the paper will describe the matching procedure to ensure the same OPC signature at reticle level. We will give an example of an internal maskshop matching exercise, which could be needed when we switched from an already qualified 50 KeV tool to a new 50 KeV tool. The second example is the same matching exercise of our 65nm OPC structures, but with two different maskshops. The last part of the paper will show first results on dedicated OPC structures for the 45nm node.