Jonathan Planchot

3D Mask modeling with Oblique incidence and Mask Corner rounding effects for the 32nm node

The perpetual shrinking in critical dimensions in semiconductor devices is driving the need for increased resolution in optical lithography. Increasing NA to gain resolution also increases Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) model complexity. Some optical effects which have been completely neglected in OPC modeling become important. Over the past few years, off-axis illumination has been widely used to improve the imaging process. OPC models which utilize such illumination still use the thin film mask approximation (Kirchhoff approach), during optical model generation, which utilizes a normal incidence. However, simulating a three dimensional mask near-field using an off-axis illumination requires OPC models to introduce oblique incidence. In addition, the use of higher NA systems introduces high obliquity field components that can no longer be assimilated as normal incident waves. The introduction of oblique incidence requires other effects, such as corner rounding of mask features, to be considered, that are seldom taken into account in OPC modeling. In this paper, the effects of oblique incidence and corner rounding of mask features on resist contours of 2D structures (i.e. line-ends and corners) are studied. Rigorous electromagnetic simulations are performed to investigate the scattering properties of various lithographic 32nm node mask structures. Simulations are conducted using a three dimensional phase shift mask topology and an off-axis illumination at high NA. Aerial images are calculated and compared with those obtained from a classical normal incidence illumination. The benefits of using an oblique incidence to improve hot-spot prediction will be discussed.

Advanced OPC Mask-3D and Resist-3D modeling

The objective of this paper is to extend the ability of a more stable overall process control for the 28 nm Metal layer. A method to better control complex 2D-layout structures for this node is described. Challenges are coming from the fact that the structures, which limit the process window are mainly of 2D routing nature and are difficult to monitor. Within the framework of this study the emphasis is on how to predict these process-window-limiting structures upfront, to identify root causes and to assist in easier monitoring solutions enhancing the process control. To address those challenges, the first step is the construction of a reliable Mask-3D and Resist-3D model. Advanced 3Dmodeling allows better prediction of process variation upfront. Furthermore it allows highlighting critical structures impacted by either best-focus shifts or by low-contrast resist-imaging effects, which then will be transferred non-linearly after etch. This paper has a tight attention on measuring the 3D nature of the resist profiles by multiple experimental techniques such as Cross-section scanning electron microscopy methods (X-SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Based on these measurements the most reliable data are selected to calibrate full-chip Resist-3D model with. Current results show efficient profile matching among the calibrated R3D model, wafer AFM and X-SEM measurements. In parallel this study enables the application of a new metric as result of the resist profiles behavior in function of exposure dose. In addition it renders the importance on the resist shape. Together these items are reflected to be efficient support on process optimization and improvement on the process control.

Three-dimensional mask effects and source polarization impact on OPC model accuracy and process window

As semiconductor technology moves toward and beyond the 65 nm lithography node, the importance of Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) models grows due to the lithographers need to ensure high fidelity in the mask- to-silicon transfer. This, in turn, causes OPC model complexity to increase as NA increases and minimum feature size on the mask decreases. Subtle effects, that were considered insignificant, can no longer be ignored. Depending on the imaging system, three dimensional mask effects need to be included in OPC modeling. These effects can be used to improve model accuracy and to better predict the final process window. In this paper, the effects of 3D mask topology on process window are studied using several 45 nm node mask structure types. Simulations are conducted with and without a polarized illumination source. The benefits of using an advanced model algorithm, that comprehends 3D mask effects, will be discussed. To quantify the potential impact of this methodology, relative to current best known practices, all results are compared to those obtained from a model using a conventional thin film mask.

Full field lithographical verification using scanner and mask intrafieldfingerprint

Full chip verification has become a key component of the optical proximity correction (OPC) methodology over the last decade. Full field verification to catch cross-field effects based on scanner information is becoming increasingly important in lithography verification. Lithographic Manufacturing Check (LMC) performed with the Brion Tachyon engine, which is the industry reference tool, now provides the capability to predict wafer CD variations across the entire field through process windows. LMC is catching and reporting weak lithographic points having small process windows or excessive sensitivities to mask errors based on the simulation from models with ASML scanner specific parameters. ASML scanner intra-field information such as dose, focus, flare, illuminator map, aberration data or mask bias map can be integrated into the LMC run to create an across-field verification and can improve the accuracy of the prediction at different field locations. In this study we compare such across-field LMC verification with a reference LMC without any scanner specific data. Scanner information was loaded into the LMC model by using the Scanner Fingerprint File (SFF) functionality. Various across field LMC runs using scanner information have been performed and analysed to identify critical design hotspots or scanner drifts and compared with wafer measurement. Full field Tachyon LMC results on 40nm Poly and 28nm Metal1 layer are presented. The goal is to investigate the impact of mask, lens aberrations, illuminator, dose and focus map. This investigation includes wafer validation of the methodology on identified critical hot spots.

DAPHNE silicon photonics technological platform for research and development on WDM applications

A new technological platform aimed at making prototypes and feasibility studies has been setup at STMicroelectronics using 300mm wafer foundry facilities. The technology, called DAPHNE (Datacom Advanced PHotonic Nanoscale Environment), is devoted at developing and evaluating new devices and sub-systems in particular for wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) applications and ring resonator based applications. Developed in the course of PLAT4MFP7 European project, DAPHNE is a flexible platform that fits perfectly R&D needs. The fabrication flow enables the processing of photonic integrated circuits using a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) of 300nm, partial etches of 150nm and 50nm and a total silicon etching. Consequently, two varieties of rib waveguides and one strip waveguide can be fabricated simultaneously with auto-alignment properties. The process variability on the 150nm partially etched silicon and the thin 50nm slab region are both less than 6 nm. Using a variety of different implantation configurations and a back-end of line of 5 metal layers, active devices are fabricated both in germanium and silicon. An available far back-end of line process consists of making 20 μm diameter copper posts on top of the electrical pads so that an electronic integrated circuit can be bonded on top the photonic die by 3D integration. Besides having those fabrication process options, DAPHNE is equipped with a library of standard cells for optical routing and multiplexing. Moreover, typical Mach-Zehnder modulators based on silicon pn junctions are also available for optical signal modulation. To achieve signal detection, germanium photodetectors also exist as standard cells. The measured single-mode propagation losses are 3.5 dB/cm for strip, 3.7 dB/cm for deep-rib (50nm slab) and 1.4 dB/cm for standard rib (150nm slab) waveguides. Transition tapers between different waveguide structures are as low as 0.006 dB.

Study of SRAF placement for contact at 45 nm and 32 nm node

At 45 and 32 nm nodes, one of the most critical layers is the Contact one. Due to the use of hyper NA imaging, the depth of focus starts to be very limited. Moreover the OPC is rapidly limited because of the increase of the pattern density. The limited surface in the dark field region of a Contact layer mask enforces the edges movement to stop very quickly. The use of SRAF (Sub Resolution Assist Feature) has been widely use for DOF enhancement of line and space layers since many technology node. Recently, SRAF generated using inverse lithography have shown interesting DOF improvement1. However, the advantage of the ideal mask generated by inverse lithography is lost when switching to a manufacturable mask with Manhattan structures. For SRAF placed in rule based as well as Manhattan SRAF generated after inverse lithography, it is important to know what their behavior is, in term of size and placement. In this article we propose to study the placement of scatter-trenches assist features for the contact layer. For this we have performed process window simulation with different SRAF sizes and distance to the main OPC. These results permit us to establish the trends for size and placement of the SRAF. Moreover we have also take a look of the advantages of using 8 surrounding SRAF (4 in vertical - horizontal and 4 at 45°) versus 4 surrounding SRAF. Based on these studies we have seen that there is no real gain of increasing the complexity by adding additional SRAF.

Model-based mask verification

One of the most critical points for accurate OPC is to have accurate models that properly simulate the full process from the mask fractured data to the etched remaining structures on the wafer. In advanced technology nodes, the CD error budget becomes so tight that it is becoming critical to improve modeling accuracy. Current technology models used for OPC generation and verification are mostly composed of an optical model, a resist model and sometimes an etch model. The mask contribution is nominally accounted for in the optical and resist portions of these models. Mask processing has become ever more complex throughout the years so properly modeling this portion of the process has the potential to improve the overall modeling accuracy. Also, measuring and tracking individual mask parameters such as CD bias can potentially improve wafer yields by detecting hotspots caused by individual mask characteristics. In this paper, we will show results of a new approach that incorporates mask process modeling. We will also show results of testing a new dynamic mask bias application used during OPC verification.

Resist 3D model based OPC for 28nm metal process window enlargement

28nm metal 90nm pitch is one of the most challenging processes for computational lithography due to the resolution limit of DUV scanners and the variety of designs allowed by design rules. Classical two dimensional hotspot simulations and OPC correction isn’t sufficient to obtain required process windows for mass production. This paper shows how three dimensional resist effects like top loss and line end shortening have been calibrated and used during the OPC process in order to achieve larger process window. Yield results on 28FDSOI product have been used to benchmark and validate gain between classical OPC and R3D OPC.

Patterning critical dimension control for advanced logic nodes

Abstract. Patterning process control has undergone major evolutions over the last few years. Critical dimension, focus, and overlay control require deep insight into process-variability understanding to be properly apprehended. Process setup is a complex engineering challenge. In the era of mid k1 lithography (>0.6), process windows were quite comfortable with respect to tool capabilities, therefore, some sources of variability were, if not ignored, at least considered as negligible. The low k1 patterning (<0.4) era has broken down this concept. For the most advanced nodes, engineers need to consider such a wide set of information that holistic processing is often mentioned as the way to handle the setup of the process and its variability. The main difficulty is to break down process-variability sources in detail and be aware that what could have been formerly negligible has become a very significant contributor requiring control down to a fraction of a nanometer. The scope of this article is to highlight that today, engineers have to zoom deeper into variability. Even though process tools have greatly improved their capabilities, diminishing process windows require more than tool-intrinsic optimization. Process control and variability compensations are major contributors to success. Some examples will be used to explain how complex the situation is and how interlinked processes are today.

Best focus shift mitigation for extending the depth of focus

The low-k1 domain of immersion lithography tends to result in much smaller depths of focus (DoF) compared to prior technology nodes. For 28 nm technology and beyond it is a challenge since (metal) layers have to deal with a wide range of structures. Beside the high variety of features, the reticle induced (mask 3D) effects became non-negligible. These mask 3D effects lead to best focus shift. In order to enhance the overlapping DoF, so called usable DoF (uDoF), alignment of each individual features best focus is required. So means the mitigation of the best focus shift. This study investigates the impact of mask 3D effects and the ability to correct the wavefront in order to extend the uDoF. The generation of the wavefront correction map is possible by using computational lithographic such Tachyon simulations software (from Brion). And inside the scanner the wavefront optimization is feasible by applying a projection lens modulator, FlexWaveTM (by ASML). This study explores both the computational lithography and scanner wavefront correction capabilities. In the first part of this work, simulations are conducted based on the determination and mitigation of best focus shift (coming from mask 3D effects) so as to improve the uDoF. In order to validate the feasibility of best focus shift decrease by wavefront tuning and mitigation results, the wavefront optimization provided correction maps are introduced into a rigorous simulator. Finally these results on best focus shift and uDoF are compared to wafers exposed using FlexWave then measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).