Hee-Geun Jeong
Samsung
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Hee-Geun Jeong.
international solid-state circuits conference | 2014
Jung-Chak Ahn; Kyung-Ho Lee; Yi-tae Kim; Hee-Geun Jeong; Bum-Suk Kim; Hong-ki Kim; Jong-Eun Park; Taesub Jung; Won-Je Park; Taeheon Lee; Eun-Kyung Park; Sangjun Choi; Gyehun Choi; Haeyong Park; Yujung Choi; Seungwook Lee; Yun-kyung Kim; Y. Jay Jung; D.I. Park; Seungjoo Nah; Young-Sun Oh; Mi-Hye Kim; Yooseung Lee; Youngwoo Chung; Ihara Hisanori; Joonhyuk Im; Daniel K. J. Lee; Byung-hyun Yim; Gidoo Lee; Heesang Kown
According to the trend towards high-resolution CMOS image sensors, pixel sizes are continuously shrinking, towards and below 1.0μm, and sizes are now reaching a technological limit to meet required SNR performance [1-2]. SNR at low-light conditions, which is a key performance metric, is determined by the sensitivity and crosstalk in pixels. To improve sensitivity, pixel technology has migrated from frontside illumination (FSI) to backside illumiation (BSI) as pixel size shrinks down. In BSI technology, it is very difficult to further increase the sensitivity in a pixel of near-1.0μm size because there are no structural obstacles for incident light from micro-lens to photodiode. Therefore the only way to improve low-light SNR is to reduce crosstalk, which makes the non-diagonal elements of the color-correction matrix (CCM) close to zero and thus reduces color noise [3]. The best way to improve crosstalk is to introduce a complete physical isolation between neighboring pixels, e.g., using deep-trench isolation (DTI). So far, a few attempts using DTI have been made to suppress silicon crosstalk. A backside DTI in as small as 1.12μm-pixel, which is formed in the BSI process, is reported in [4], but it is just an intermediate step in the DTI-related technology because it cannot completely prevent silicon crosstalk, especially for long wavelengths of light. On the other hand, front-side DTIs for FSI pixels [5] and BSI pixels [6] are reported. In [5], however, DTI is present not only along the periphery of each pixel, but also invades into the pixel so that it is inefficient in terms of gathering incident light and providing sufficient amount of photodiode area. In [6], the pixel size is as large as 2.0μm and it is hard to scale down with this technology for near 1.0μm pitch because DTI width imposes a critical limit on the sufficient amount of photodiode area for full-well capacity. Thus, a new technological advance is necessary to realize the ideal front DTI in a small size pixel near 1.0μm.
international electron devices meeting | 2006
Jin-Ho Kim; Jongchol Shin; Chang-Rok Moon; Seok-Ha Lee; D. Park; Hee-Geun Jeong; Doo-Won Kwon; Jongwan Jung; Hyunpil Noh; Kang-Bok Lee; K. Koh; Duck-Hyung Lee; Kinam Kim
Technology and characteristics of 8-mega density CMOS image sensor (CIS) with unit pixel size of 1.75times1.75mum2 are introduced. With recessed transfer gate (RTG) structure and other sophisticated process/device technology, remarkably enhanced saturation capacity and ultra-low dark current have been obtained, which satisfy the requirements of high density digital still camera (DSC) application
Archive | 1999
Hee-Geun Jeong; Yongshik Kim
Archive | 2005
Hee-Geun Jeong
Archive | 2006
Hee-Geun Jeong; Jae-Seob Roh; Seok-Ha Lee
Archive | 2001
Hee-Geun Jeong; Yongshik Kim
Archive | 2015
Young-Woo Jung; Jung-Chak Ahn; Hee-Geun Jeong
Archive | 2017
Young-Sun Oh; Kyung-Ho Lee; Jung-Chak Ahn; Hee-Geun Jeong
symposium on vlsi technology | 2013
Jung-Chak Ahn; Bum-Suk Kim; Kyung-Ho Lee; Sangjun Choi; Hee-Geun Jeong; Hong-ki Kim; Goto Hiroshige; Chi-Young Choi; Duck-Hyung Lee
Archive | 2013
Shin-Wook Yi; Hyoung-soo Ko; Kyung-Ho Lee; Young-Woo Jung; Hee-Geun Jeong