Kenneth S. Rukstales
United States Geological Survey
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kenneth S. Rukstales.
Earthquake Spectra | 2000
E. V. Leyendecker; R. J. Hunt; Arthur Frankel; Kenneth S. Rukstales
The 1997 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings use a design procedure that is based on spectral response acceleration rather than the traditional peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, or zone factors. The spectral response accelerations are obtained from maps prepared following the recommendations of the Building Seismic Safety Councils (BSSC) Seismic Design Procedures Group (SDPG). The SDPG-recommended maps, the Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) Ground Motion Maps, are based on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) probabilistic hazard maps with additional modifications incorporating deterministic ground motions in selected areas and the application of engineering judgement. The MCE ground motion maps included with the 1997 NEHRP Provisions also serve as the basis for the ground motion maps used in the seismic design portions of the 2000 International Building Code and the 2000 International Residential Code. Additionally the design maps prepared for the 1997 NEHRP Provisions, combined with selected USGS probabilistic maps, are used with the 1997 NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings.
Earthquake Spectra | 2015
Mark D. Petersen; Morgan P. Moschetti; Peter Powers; Charles S. Mueller; Kathleen M. Haller; Arthur Frankel; Yuehua Zeng; Sanaz Rezaeian; Stephen C. Harmsen; Oliver S. Boyd; Ned Field; Rui Chen; Kenneth S. Rukstales; Nico Luco; Russell L. Wheeler; Robert A. Williams; Anna H. Olsen
New seismic hazard maps have been developed for the conterminous United States using the latest data, models, and methods available for assessing earthquake hazard. The hazard models incorporate new information on earthquake rupture behavior observed in recent earthquakes; fault studies that use both geologic and geodetic strain rate data; earthquake catalogs through 2012 that include new assessments of locations and magnitudes; earthquake adaptive smoothing models that more fully account for the spatial clustering of earthquakes; and 22 ground motion models, some of which consider more than double the shaking data applied previously. Alternative input models account for larger earthquakes, more complicated ruptures, and more varied ground shaking estimates than assumed in earlier models. The ground motions, for levels applied in building codes, differ from the previous version by less than ±10% over 60% of the country, but can differ by ±50% in localized areas. The models are incorporated in insurance rates, risk assessments, and as input into the U.S. building code provisions for earthquake ground shaking.
Earthquake Spectra | 2015
Kishor Jaiswal; Mark D. Petersen; Kenneth S. Rukstales; William S. Leith
A large portion of the population of the United States lives in areas vulnerable to earthquake hazards. This investigation aims to quantify population and infrastructure exposure in places within the conterminous United States that are subjected to varying levels of earthquake ground motions by systematically analyzing the last four cycles of the U.S. Geological Surveys (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Models (published in 1996, 2002, 2008 and 2014). Using the 2013 LandScan data, we estimate the number of people who are exposed to potentially damaging ground motions (peak ground accelerations at or above 0.1 g). At least 28 million (~9% of the total population) may experience 0.1 g level of shaking at relatively frequent intervals [annual rate of 1 in 72 years or 50% probability of exceedance (PE) in 50 years], 57 million (~18% of the total population) may experience this level of shaking at moderately frequent intervals (annual rate of 1 in 475 years or 10% PE in 50 years), and 143 million (~46% of the total population) may experience such shaking at relatively infrequent intervals (annual rate of 1 in 2,475 years or 2% PE in 50 years). We also show that there are a significant number of critical infrastructure facilities located in high-earthquake-hazard areas (modified Mercalli intensity ≥ VII with moderately frequent recurrence interval).
Earthquake Spectra | 2015
Nicolas Luco; Robert E. Bachman; C.B. Crouse; James R. Harris; John Hooper; Charles A. Kircher; Philip J. Caldwell; Kenneth S. Rukstales
With the 2014 update of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) as a basis, the Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) has updated the earthquake ground motion maps in the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, with partial funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Anticipated adoption of the updated maps into the American Society of Civil Engineers Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures and the International Building and Residential Codes is underway. Relative to the ground motions in the prior edition of each of these documents, most of the updated values are within a ±20% change. The larger changes are, in most cases, due to the USGS NSHM updates, reasons for which are given in companion publications. In some cases, the larger changes are partly due to a BSSC update of the slope of the fragility curve that is used to calculate the risk-targeted ground motions, and/or the introduction by BSSC of a quantitative definition of “active faults” used to calculate deterministic ground motions.
Open-File Report | 2008
Mark D. Petersen; Arthur Frankel; Stephen C. Harmsen; Charles S. Mueller; Kathleen M. Haller; Russell L. Wheeler; Robert L. Wesson; Yuehua Zeng; Oliver S. Boyd; David M. Perkins; Nicolas Luco; Edward H. Field; Chris J. Wills; Kenneth S. Rukstales
Open-File Report | 2002
Arthur Frankel; Mark D. Petersen; Charles S. Mueller; Kathleen M. Haller; Russell L. Wheeler; E.V. Leyendecker; Robert L. Wesson; Stephen C. Harmsen; Chris H. Cramer; David M. Perkins; Kenneth S. Rukstales
Seismological Research Letters | 2017
Mark D. Petersen; Charles S. Mueller; Morgan P. Moschetti; Susan M. Hoover; Allison M. Shumway; Daniel E. McNamara; Robert A. Williams; Andrea L. Llenos; William L. Ellsworth; Andrew J. Michael; Justin L. Rubinstein; A. McGarr; Kenneth S. Rukstales
Seismological Research Letters | 2016
Mark D. Petersen; Charles S. Mueller; Morgan P. Moschetti; Susan M. Hoover; Andrea L. Llenos; William L. Ellsworth; Andrew J. Michael; Justin L. Rubinstein; A. McGarr; Kenneth S. Rukstales
Administrative Report | 2007
Mark D. Petersen; Stephen C. Harmsen; Charles S. Mueller; Kathleen M. Haller; James W. Dewey; Nicolas Luco; Anthony J. Crone; David J. Lidke; Kenneth S. Rukstales
Open-File Report | 2016
Mark D. Petersen; Charles S. Mueller; Morgan P. Moschetti; Susan M. Hoover; Andrea L. Llenos; William L. Ellsworth; Andrew J. Michael; Justin L. Rubinstein; A. McGarr; Kenneth S. Rukstales