Sara A. Healy
National Institutes of Health
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Sara A. Healy.
Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2017
Mahamadou S Sissoko; Sara A. Healy; Abdoulaye Katile; Freda Omaswa; Irfan Zaidi; Erin E. Gabriel; Bourama Kamaté; Yacouba Samake; Merepen A. Guindo; Amagana Dolo; Amadou Niangaly; Karamoko Niaré; Amatigue Zeguime; Kourane Sissoko; Hama Diallo; Ismaila Thera; Kelly Ding; Michael P. Fay; Elise O'Connell; Thomas B. Nutman; Sharon Wong-Madden; Tooba Murshedkar; Adam Ruben; Minglin Li; Yonas Abebe; Anita Manoj; Anusha Gunasekera; Sumana Chakravarty; B. Kim Lee Sim; Peter F. Billingsley
BACKGROUND Plasmodium falciparum sporozite (PfSPZ) Vaccine is a metabolically active, non-replicating, whole malaria sporozoite vaccine that has been reported to be safe and protective against P falciparum controlled human malaria infection in malaria-naive individuals. We aimed to assess the safety and protective efficacy of PfSPZ Vaccine against naturally acquired P falciparum in malaria-experienced adults in Mali. METHODS After an open-label dose-escalation study in a pilot safety cohort, we did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial based in Donéguébougou and surrounding villages in Mali. We recruited 18-35-year-old healthy adults who were randomly assigned (1:1) in a double-blind manner, with stratification by village and block randomisation, to receive either five doses of 2·7 × 105 PfSPZ or normal saline at days 0, 28, 56, 84, and 140 during the dry season (January to July inclusive). Participants and investigators were masked to group assignments, which were unmasked at the final study visit, 6 months after receipt of the last vaccination. Participants received combined artemether and lumefantrine (four tablets, each containing 20 mg artemether and 120 mg lumefantrine, given twice per day over 3 days for a total of six doses) to eliminate P falciparum before the first and last vaccinations. We collected blood smears every 2 weeks and during any illness for 24 weeks after the fifth vaccination. The primary outcome was the safety and tolerability of the vaccine, assessed as local and systemic reactogenicity and adverse events. The sample size was calculated for the exploratory efficacy endpoint of time to first P falciparum infection beginning 28 days after the fifth vaccination. The safety analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational product, whereas the efficacy analyses included only participants who received all five vaccinations. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01988636. FINDINGS Between Jan 18 and Feb 24, 2014, we enrolled 93 participants into the main study cohort with 46 participants assigned PfSPZ Vaccine and 47 assigned placebo, all of whom were evaluable for safety. We detected no significant differences in local or systemic adverse events or laboratory abnormalities between the PfSPZ Vaccine and placebo groups, and only grade 1 (mild) local or systemic adverse events occurred in both groups. The most common solicited systemic adverse event in the vaccine and placebo groups was headache (three [7%] people in the vaccine group vs four [9%] in the placebo group) followed by fatigue (one [2%] person in the placebo group), fever (one [2%] person in the placebo group), and myalgia (one [2%] person in each group). The exploratory efficacy analysis included 41 participants from the vaccine group and 40 from the placebo group. Of these participants, 37 (93%) from the placebo group and 27 (66%) from the vaccine group developed P falciparum infection. The hazard ratio for vaccine efficacy was 0·517 (95% CI 0·313-0·856) by time-to-infection analysis (log-rank p=0·01), and 0·712 (0·528-0·918) by proportional analysis (p=0·006). INTERPRETATION PfSPZ Vaccine was well tolerated and safe. PfSPZ Vaccine showed significant protection in African adults against P falciparum infection throughout an entire malaria season. FUNDING US National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program, Sanaria.
PLOS ONE | 2016
Kawsar R. Talaat; Ruth D. Ellis; Janet Hurd; Autumn Hentrich; Erin E. Gabriel; Noreen A. Hynes; Kelly M. Rausch; Daming Zhu; Olga Muratova; Raul Herrera; Charles Anderson; David G. Jones; Joan Aebig; Sarah Brockley; Nicholas J. MacDonald; Xiaowei Wang; Michael P. Fay; Sara A. Healy; Anna P. Durbin; David L. Narum; Yimin Wu; Patrick E. Duffy
Transmission-blocking vaccines (TBVs) that target sexual stage parasite development could be an integral part of measures for malaria elimination. Pfs25 is a leading TBV candidate, and previous studies conducted in animals demonstrated an improvement of its functional immunogenicity after conjugation to EPA, a recombinant, detoxified ExoProtein A from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this report, we describe results of an open-label, dose-escalating Phase 1 trial to assess the safety and immunogenicity of Pfs25-EPA conjugates formulated with Alhydrogel®. Thirty malaria-naïve healthy adults received up to four doses of the conjugate vaccine, with 8, 16, or 47 μg of conjugated Pfs25 mass, at 0, 2, 4, and 10 months. Vaccinations were generally well tolerated. The majority of solicited adverse events were mild in severity with pain at the injection site the most common complaint. Anemia was the most common laboratory abnormality, but was considered possibly related to the study in only a minority of cases. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred. The peak geometric mean anti-Pfs25 antibody level in the highest dose group was 88 (95% CI 53, 147) μg/mL two weeks after the 4th vaccination, and declined to near baseline one year later. Antibody avidity increased over successive vaccinations. Transmission blocking activity demonstrated in a standard membrane feeding assay (SMFA) also increased from the second to the third dose, and correlated with antibody titer and, after the final dose, with antibody avidity. These results support the further evaluation of Pfs25-EPA/Alhydrogel® in a malaria-endemic population.
Journal of Immunology | 2017
Irfan Zaidi; Hama Diallo; Solomon Conteh; Yvette Robbins; Jacqueline Kolasny; Sachy Orr-Gonzalez; Dariyen Carter; Brandi Butler; Lynn Lambert; Elizabeth B. Brickley; Robert Morrison; Mahamadou Sissoko; Sara A. Healy; B. Kim Lee Sim; Ogobara K. Doumbo; Stephen L. Hoffman; Patrick E. Duffy
Whole-sporozoite vaccines confer sterilizing immunity to malaria-naive individuals by unknown mechanisms. In the first PfSPZ Vaccine trial ever in a malaria-endemic population, Vδ2 γδ T cells were significantly elevated and Vγ9/Vδ2 transcripts ranked as the most upregulated in vaccinees who were protected from Plasmodium falciparum infection. In a mouse model, absence of γδ T cells during vaccination impaired protective CD8 T cell responses and ablated sterile protection. γδ T cells were not required for circumsporozoite protein–specific Ab responses, and γδ T cell depletion before infectious challenge did not ablate protection. γδ T cells alone were insufficient to induce protection and required the presence of CD8α+ dendritic cells. In the absence of γδ T cells, CD8α+ dendritic cells did not accumulate in the livers of vaccinated mice. Altogether, our results show that γδ T cells were essential for the induction of sterile immunity during whole-organism vaccination.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Angela K. Talley; Sara A. Healy; Olivia C. Finney; Sean C. Murphy; James G. Kublin; Carola Salas; Susan Lundebjerg; Peter B. Gilbert; Wesley C. Van Voorhis; John Whisler; Ruobing Wang; Chris Ockenhouse; D. Gray Heppner; Stefan H. I. Kappe; Patrick E. Duffy
Background Controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) studies which recapitulate mosquito-borne infection are a critical tool to identify protective vaccine and drug candidates for advancement to field trials. In partnership with the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, the CHMI model was established at the Seattle Biomedical Research Institutes Malaria Clinical Trials Center (MCTC). Activities and reagents at both centers were aligned to ensure comparability and continued safety of the model. To demonstrate successful implementation, CHMI was performed in six healthy malaria-naïve volunteers. Methods All volunteers received NF54 strain Plasmodium falciparum by the bite of five infected Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes under controlled conditions and were monitored for signs and symptoms of malaria and for parasitemia by peripheral blood smear. Subjects were treated upon diagnosis with chloroquine by directly observed therapy. Immunological (T cell and antibody) and molecular diagnostic (real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [qRT-PCR]) assessments were also performed. Results All six volunteers developed patent parasitemia and clinical malaria. No serious adverse events occurred during the study period or for six months post-infection. The mean prepatent period was 11.2 days (range 9–14 days), and geometric mean parasitemia upon diagnosis was 10.8 parasites/µL (range 2–69) by microscopy. qRT-PCR detected parasites an average of 3.7 days (range 2–4 days) earlier than blood smears. All volunteers developed antibodies to the blood-stage antigen merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP-1), which persisted up to six months. Humoral and cellular responses to pre-erythrocytic antigens circumsporozoite protein (CSP) and liver-stage antigen 1 (LSA-1) were limited. Conclusion The CHMI model was safe, well tolerated and characterized by consistent prepatent periods, pre-symptomatic diagnosis in 3/6 subjects and adverse event profiles as reported at established centers. The MCTC can now evaluate candidates in the increasingly diverse vaccine and drug pipeline using the CHMI model. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01058226
PLOS ONE | 2014
Charlotte V. Hobbs; Jillian Neal; Solomon Conteh; Liam Donnelly; Jingyang Chen; Kennan Marsh; Lynn Lambert; Sachy Orr-Gonzalez; Jessica Hinderer; Sara A. Healy; William Borkowsky; Scott R. Penzak; Sumana Chakravarty; Stephen L. Hoffman; Patrick E. Duffy
We have previously shown that the HIV protease inhibitor lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV-RTV) and the antibiotic trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) inhibit Plasmodium liver stages in rodent malarias and in vitro in P. falciparum. Since clinically relevant levels are better achieved in the non-human-primate model, and since Plasmodium knowlesi is an accepted animal model for the study of liver stages of malaria as a surrogate for P. falciparum infection, we investigated the antimalarial activity of these drugs on Plasmodium knowlesi liver stages in rhesus macaques. We demonstrate that TMP-SMX and TMP-SMX+LPV-RTV (in combination), but not LPV-RTV alone, inhibit liver stage parasite development. Because drugs that inhibit the clinically silent liver stages target parasites when they are present in lower numbers, these results may have implications for eradication efforts.
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene | 2017
Mamadou B. Coulibaly; Erin E. Gabriel; Youssouf Sinaba; Daman Sylla; Adama Sacko; Lakamy Sylla; Boubacar Coulibaly; Jen C.C. Hume; Ibrahima Baber; Mahamadoun H. Assadou; Issaka Sagara; Yimin Wu; Sara A. Healy; Ogobara Doumbo; Sekou F. Traore; Patrick E. Duffy
Malaria transmission-blocking vaccines (TBV) have been evaluated in field trials in Mali since 2013. However, the assays currently used to measure serum antibody TB activity (TBA) after vaccination are highly variable, in part due to the lack of optimization and standardization for field assays in which mosquitoes feed on gametocytemic blood. Herein, we report a study conducted in Bancoumana village, Mali, where we identify and optimize the parameters that contribute to successful mosquito feeding outcomes in both direct skin feeds (DSFs) and direct membrane feeding assays (DMFA). These parameters include: 1) mosquito age, 2) duration of mosquito starvation prior to feeding, 3) membrane selection for DMFA, 4) anatomical location of DSF feeding (arm, calf, and ankle), and 5) time of day for DSF (dawn or dusk). We found that younger mosquitoes were significantly associated with higher feeding, survival, and infection rates. Longer starvation times were positively, but not significantly, associated with higher infection rates, but were negatively associated with feeding and survival. Membrane type and body location did not affect infection outcome significantly. Although dusk was found to be associated with higher infection rates, this may be confounded by the time from positive blood smear. Based on these findings, we make specific recommendations for optimal feeding parameters in the different assay types to maximize the chance of detecting parasite transmission in a standardized manner.
Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2018
Issaka Sagara; Sara A. Healy; Mahamadoun H Assadou; Erin E. Gabriel; Mamady Kone; Kourane Sissoko; Intimbeye Tembine; Merepen A Guindo; M'Bouye Doucoure; Karamoko Niaré; Amagana Dolo; Kelly M. Rausch; David L. Narum; David L Jones; Nicholas J. MacDonald; Daming Zhu; Rathy Mohan; Olga Muratova; Ibrahima Baber; Mamadou B Coulibaly; Michael P. Fay; Charles Anderson; Yimin Wu; Sekou F Traore; Ogobara K. Doumbo; Patrick E. Duffy
BACKGROUND Pfs25H-EPA is a protein-protein conjugate transmission-blocking vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum that is safe and induces functional antibodies in malaria-naive individuals. In this field trial, we assessed Pfs25H-EPA/Alhydrogel for safety and functional immunogenicity in Malian adults. METHODS This double-blind, randomised, comparator-controlled, dose-escalation trial in Bancoumana, Mali, was done in two staggered phases, an initial pilot safety assessment and a subsequent main phase. Healthy village residents aged 18-45 years were eligible if they had normal laboratory results (including HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C tests) and had not received a previous malaria vaccine or recent immunosuppressive drugs, vaccines, or blood products. Participants in the pilot safety cohort and the main cohort were assigned (1:1) by block randomisation to a study vaccine group. Participants in the pilot safety cohort received two doses of Pfs25H-EPA/Alhydrogel 16 μg or Euvax B (comparator vaccine), and participants in the main cohort received Pfs25H-EPA/Alhydrogel 47 μg or comparator vaccine (Euvax B for the first, second, and third vaccinations and Menactra for the fourth vaccination). Participants and investigators were masked to group assignment, and randomisation codes in sealed envelopes held by a site pharmacist. Vials with study drug for injection were covered by opaque tape and labelled with a study identification number. Group assignments were unmasked at final study visit. The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability for all vaccinees. The secondary outcome measure was immunogenicity 14 days after vaccination in the per-protocol population, as confirmed by the presence of antibodies against Pfs25H measured by ELISA IgG and antibody functionality assessed by standard membrane feeding assays and by direct skin feeding assays. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01867463. FINDINGS Between May 15, and Jun 16, 2013, 230 individuals were screened for eligibility. 20 individuals were enrolled in the pilot safety cohort; ten participants were assigned to receive Pfs25H-EPA/Alhydrogel 16 μg, and ten participants were assigned to receive comparator vaccine. 100 individuals were enrolled in the main cohort; 50 participants were assigned to receive Pfs25H-EPA/Alhydrogel 47 μg, and 50 participants were assigned to receive comparator vaccine. Compared with comparator vaccinees, Pfs25H vaccinees had more solicited adverse events (137 events vs 86 events; p=0·022) and treatment-related adverse events (191 events vs 126 events, p=0·034), but the number of other adverse events did not differ between study vaccine groups (792 vs 683). Pfs25H antibody titres increased with each dose, with a peak geometric mean of 422·3 ELISA units (95% CI 290-615) after the fourth dose, but decreased relatively rapidly thereafter, with a half-life of 42 days for anti-Pfs25H and 59 days for anti-EPA (median ratio of titres at day 600 to peak, 0·19 for anti-Pfs25H vs 0·29 for anti-EPA; p=0·009). Serum transmission-reducing activity was greater for Pfs25H than for comparator vaccine after the fourth vaccine dose (p<0·001) but not after the third dose (p=0·09). Repeated direct skin feeds were well tolerated, but the number of participants who infected at least one mosquito did not differ between Pfs25H and comparator vaccinees after the fourth dose (p=1, conditional exact). INTERPRETATION Pfs25H-EPA/Alhydrogel was well tolerated and induced significant serum activity by standard membrane feeding assays but transmission blocking activity was not confirmed by weekly direct skin feed. This activity required four doses, and titres decreased rapidly after the fourth dose. Alternative antigens or combinations should be assessed to improve activity. FUNDING Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene | 2017
M’Bouye Doucoure; Sintry Sanogo; Mamady Kone; Merepen Agnes Guindo; Ogobara K. Doumbo; Sara A. Healy; Patrick E. Duffy; Ruth D. Ellis; Issaka Sagara; Mahamadoun Hamady Assadou; Freda Omaswa; Sekouba Keita; Yimin Wu
The epidemiological characterization of transmission reservoirs is a critical step in preparation for interventional trials for malaria elimination/eradication. Using cluster sampling and households/compounds as units of sampling, we recruited and followed monthly, from June 2011 to June 2012, 250 volunteers 3 months to 50 years of age in Bancoumana, Mali. In July 2012, only participants 5-35 years of age (N = 121) were reenrolled and followed for an additional year. Malaria infection prevalence was highest in October in both 2011 (21.5%, 50/233) and 2012 (38.2%, 26/68). During both years, malaria infection prevalence was highest in children 5-14 years of age (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). The gametocyte carriage prevalence was highest in November 2011 (7.6%, 17/225) and in October 2012 (16.2%, 11/68). Gametocyte carriage rates by age did not significantly differ in 2011 and 2012. In Bancoumana, the asexual and sexual parasite carriage rates are relatively high and highly seasonal. Seasonal variation and age differences in parasite and gametocyte carriage provide essential knowledge for the design of transmission blocking assay and vaccine studies in the field.
Malaria Journal | 2014
Peter F. Billingsley; B. Kim Lee Sim; Eric R. James; Thomas L. Richie; Seif Shekalaghe; Sara A. Healy; Mahamadou S Sissoko; Benjamin Mordmueller; Julie E. Ledgerwood; Barney S. Graham; Patrick E. Duffy; Robert A. Seder; Kirsten E. Lyke; Judith E. Epstein; Pedro L. Alonso; Salim Abdullah; Ogobara Duombo; Peter G. Kremsner; Marcel Tanner; Stephen L. Hoffman
Sanaria® PfSPZ Vaccine is composed of aseptic, purified, cryopreserved, attenuated (non-replicating), metabolically active Plasmodium falciparum (Pf ) sporozoites (SPZ) produced in compliance with good manufacturing practices (GMPs) that meet all regulatory standards. This vaccine provided full protection against Pf infection in 100% (6/6) volunteers, who received five doses of 1.35 × 105 PfSPZ administered intravenously in a study at the Vaccine Research Center (VRC), NIAID, NIH [1]. Based on these data, the PfSPZ Vaccine Clinical Consortium composed of investigators from USA, Africa, and Europe has developed a four stage clinical development plan (CDP) that maps out a 4-5 year timeline to licensure and a large scale demonstration project to eliminate malaria from an island population in Africa. In 2014, six different clinical trials of PfSPZ Vaccine at seven clinical sites in the United States (Bethesda, Baltimore, Silver Spring), Mali, Tanzania, Equatorial Guinea, and Germany will be underway. These six clinical trials, which include >450 subjects, comprise Stage 1 of the four stage PfSPZ Vaccine CDP. They are designed to 1) assess the reproducibility of the data generated in the VRC study and 2) assess and optimize durability of protection, protection against heterologous strains of Pf, reduction in numbers of doses, immune assays that predict protection, implementation of immunization, and alternative route of administration. We will provide an update of these stage 1 clinical trials and plans for stage 2 studies that will address questions required for progressing to pivotal phase 3 clinical trials in stage 3, and to demonstration projects for focal elimination in small populations.
Vaccine | 2016
Elizabeth B. Brickley; Mamadou Coulibaly; Erin E. Gabriel; Sara A. Healy; Jen C.C. Hume; Issaka Sagara; Sekou F. Traore; Ogobara K. Doumbo; Patrick E. Duffy