Chock H. Gan
Qualcomm
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Chock H. Gan.
international electron devices meeting | 2010
Pr Chidambaram; Chock H. Gan; S. Sengupta; Lixin Ge; Ying Chen; Sam Yang; Ping Liu; Joseph Wang; Ming-Ta Yang; Charles Teng; Yang Du; Prayag B. Patel; Pratyush Kamal; R. Bucki; Foua Vang; A. Datta; K. Bellur; Sei Seung Yoon; N. Chen; A. Thean; Michael Han; Esin Terzioglu; Xuefeng Zhang; J. Fischer; Mehdi Hamidi Sani; B. Flederbach; Geoffrey Yeap
With newer technology nodes, circuit/device/process codesign is essential to realize the advantages of scaling. Leveraging co-design approach based on a well-established manufacturing flow, a cost effective 28 nm 4G SOC technology has been crafted. This 28 nm design strategy uses two sets of design rules and 7 different Vt cells with optimal power gating to achieve a 2.4× increase in gate density, 55% decrease in power and 30% gain in frequency with respect to the 45 nm counterpart. Relevant technical tradeoffs between the design/technology interactions are discussed to illustrate the codesign aspects.
symposium on vlsi technology | 2014
G. Nallapati; John Jianhong Zhu; Joseph Wang; J.Y. Sheu; K.L. Cheng; Chock H. Gan; Da Yang; Ming Cai; J. Cheng; Lixin Ge; Ying Chen; R. Bucki; B. Bowers; Foua Vang; Xiangdong Chen; O. Kwon; Sei Seung Yoon; C.C. Wu; Pr Chidambaram; Min Cao; J. Fischer; Esin Terzioglu; Y.J. Mii; Geoffrey Yeap
A cost competitive 20nm technology node is described that enabled industry-first 20nm cellular modem chip with 2× peak data rates vs 28nm, and 2× carrier aggregation. Process and design enhancements for layout context optimization, and continuous process improvements resulted in 18% boost in circuit performance while simultaneously achieving >30% power reduction. 3 mask local interconnect and 64nm double patterning lower level metals - with yield-friendly single color pitch of 95nm and M1 special constructs with 90nm (=gate pitch) single color pitch for cell abutment - were used for achieving ~2× gate density. Single patterning 80nm pitch metal for routing levels was optimized for both density and performance. Active/passive device and double pattern metal mask count was optimized to reach process should-cost goals. Resulting technology provides cost reduction vs 28 HKMG per close to historical trend, and also cost-competitiveness vs 28 PolySiON. Leveraging of yield learning of this common back-end metallization results in up to 6 month pull-in of 16nm Finfet node yield ramp.
Proceedings of SPIE | 2014
Da Yang; Chock H. Gan; Pr Chidambaram; Giri Nallapadi; John Jianhong Zhu; Seung-Chul Song; Jeff Xu; Geoffrey Yeap
How to maintain the Moore’s Law scaling beyond the 193 immersion resolution limit is the key question semiconductor industry needs to answer in the near future. Process complexity will undoubtfully increase for 14nm node and beyond, which brings both challenges and opportunities for technology development. A vertically integrated design-technologymanufacturing co-optimization flow is desired to better address the complicated issues new process changes bring. In recent years smart mobile wireless devices have been the fastest growing consumer electronics market. Advanced mobile devices such as smartphones are complex systems with the overriding objective of providing the best userexperience value by harnessing all the technology innovations. Most critical system drivers are better system performance/power efficiency, cost effectiveness, and smaller form factors, which, in turns, drive the need of system design and solution with More-than-Moore innovations. Mobile system-on-chips (SoCs) has become the leading driver for semiconductor technology definition and manufacturing. Here we highlight how the co-optimization strategy influenced architecture, device/circuit, process technology and package, in the face of growing process cost/complexity and variability as well as design rule restrictions.
Archive | 2014
Benjamin John Bowers; James W. Hayward; Charanya Gopal; Gregory Christopher Burda; Robert J. Bucki; Chock H. Gan; Giridhar Nallapati; Matthew D. Youngblood; William R. Flederbach
Archive | 2012
Prayag B. Patel; Pratyush Kamal; Foua Vang; Chock H. Gan; Pr Chidambaram; Chethan Swamynathan
Archive | 2014
Bin Yang; Pr Chidambaram; John Jianhong Zhu; Jihong Choi; Da Yang; Ravi Mahendra Todi; Giridhar Nallapati; Chock H. Gan; Ming Cai; Samit Sengupta
Archive | 2009
Haining Yang; Chock H. Gan; Zhongze Wang; Beom-Mo Han
Archive | 2013
Jeffrey Herbert Fischer; William R. Flederbach; Kyungseok Kim; Robert J. Bucki; Chock H. Gan; William James Goodall
Archive | 2015
Pr Chidambaram; Prayag B. Patel; Foua Vang; Pratyush Kamal; Chock H. Gan; Chethan Swamynathan
Archive | 2015
Ming Cai; Samit Sengupta; Chock H. Gan; Pr Chidambaram