Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Christopher M. Durham is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Christopher M. Durham.


custom integrated circuits conference | 2010

A 32nm 0.5V-supply dual-read 6T SRAM

Jente B. Kuang; Jeremy D. Schaub; Fadi H. Gebara; Dieter Wendel; Sudesh Saroop; Tuyet Nguyen; Thomas Fröhnel; Antje Müller; Christopher M. Durham; Rolf Sautter; Bryan J. Lloyd; Bryan J. Robbins; Juergen Pille; Sani R. Nassif; Kevin J. Nowka

Dual read port SRAMs play a critical role in high performance cache designs, but stability and sensing challenges typically limit the low voltage operation. We report a high-performance dual read port 8-way set associative 6T SRAM with a one clock cycle access latency, in a 32nm metal-gate partially depleted (PD) SOI technology, for low-voltage applications. Hardware exhibits robust operation at 348MHz and 0.5V with a read and write power of 3.33 and 1.97mW, respectively, per 4.5KB active array with both read ports accessed at the highest activity data pattern. At a 0.6V supply, an access speed of 1.2GHz is observed.


Archive | 1999

Circuit Design Margin and Design Variability

Kerry Bernstein; Keith M. Carrig; Christopher M. Durham; Patrick R. Hansen; David Hogenmiller; Edward J. Nowak; Norman J. Rohrer

In the preceding chapters, process variations and circuits styles were discussed. Each circuit style has its own reaction to variations of the process. Each variation must be accounted for to maintain the functionality and desired speed of the circuit across these distributions. All process parameter distributions are a function of the range that the parameter is critical both spatially and temporally. This chapter will investigate the variation of the process on static CMOS logic, dynamic domino, pass gate and DCVS logic.


Archive | 1999

Slack Borrowing and Time Stealing

Kerry Bernstein; Keith M. Carrig; Christopher M. Durham; Patrick R. Hansen; David Hogenmiller; Edward J. Nowak; Norman J. Rohrer

With any circuit, clocking, and latching selection, the concept of how to fit more logic within a path between latches than is readily available always becomes an issue. That is, inevitably a logical pipeline partition will require more time than is available, for example, more than a full-cycle time in a master-slave system or a half-cycle in a two-phase separated-latch system. Depending on the circuit style, the latching structure, and the clocking strategy, obtaining this time can be classified as one of two categories, slack borrowing and time stealing (also commonly referred to as cycle stealing).


Archive | 1999

Non-Clocked Logic Styles

Kerry Bernstein; Keith M. Carrig; Christopher M. Durham; Patrick R. Hansen; David Hogenmiller; Edward J. Nowak; Norman J. Rohrer

Non-clocked logic is ubiquitous in electronic design, due to a number of considerations including: Low power consumption Straightforward delay rule timing Inherent reliability and noise immunity Process variation and defect tolerance Migratability into successive technology generations. Deterministic diagnostic capability.


Archive | 1999

Clocked Logic Styles

Kerry Bernstein; Keith M. Carrig; Christopher M. Durham; Patrick R. Hansen; David Hogenmiller; Edward J. Nowak; Norman J. Rohrer

In the preceeding chapter, nonclocked circuit topologies were shown generally to be versatile, reliable, and relatively low in power consumption. Clocked logic, on the other hand, is recognized for its performance advantages, which may be attributed to the following: 1. In Static CMOS, logic must be built redundantly; circuit operations must be realized in both NFET and PFET device structures to accomodate both up and down logic transitions. This reduces performance by adding gate fan-out load and interconnect RC. Higher device counts lead to longer interconnects, higher power consumption and bigger die1. 2. In static CMOS, even when the redundant structure is off, the added diffusion and overlap capacitive loads increase power and delay. 3. In Static CMOS, PFET devices must drive the same loads as NFET devices, at half the transconductance. This drives PFET devices to generally be 2X the width of NFET devices for balanced transitions. The impact is of particular concern structures such as PFET devices 5 and 6 in Figure 2.2a.


Archive | 1998

High Speed CMOS Design Styles

Kerry Bernstein; Keith M. Carrig; Christopher M. Durham; Patrick R. Hansen; David Hogenmiller; Edward J. Nowak; Norman J. Rohrer


Archive | 1995

Single-rail self-resetting logic circuitry

Christopher M. Durham; Visweswara Rao Kodali; Salim A. Shah


Archive | 1989

Asynchronous segmented precharge architecture

Michael Kevin Ciraula; Christopher M. Durham; Reginald Eric Harrison; Derwin J. Jallice; Dave Christopher Lawson; Craig Lee Stephen


Archive | 1991

Glitch-proof powered-down on chip receiver with non-overlapping outputs

Michael Kevin Ciraula; Christopher M. Durham; Derwin L. Jallice


Archive | 2012

Test structure and methodology for three-dimensional semiconductor structures

Kerry Bernstein; Jerome L. Cann; Christopher M. Durham; Paul David Kartschoke; Peter Juergen Klim; Donald L. Wheater

Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge