Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rajesh A. Rao is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rajesh A. Rao.


Microelectronics Reliability | 2007

Silicon nanocrystal non-volatile memory for embedded memory scaling

Robert F. Steimle; R. Muralidhar; Rajesh A. Rao; Michael A. Sadd; Craig T. Swift; Jane A. Yater; B. Hradsky; S. Straub; Horacio P. Gasquet; L. Vishnubhotla; Erwin J. Prinz; Tushar P. Merchant; B. Acred; Ko-Min Chang; B. E. White

In this paper, we present key features of silicon nanocrystal memory technology. This technology is an attractive candidate for scaling of embedded non-volatile memory (NVM). By replacing a continuous floating gate by electrically isolated silicon nanocrystals embedded in an oxide, this technology mitigates the vulnerability of charge loss through tunnel oxide defects and hence permits tunnel oxide and operating voltage scaling along with accompanied process simplifications. However, going to discrete nanocrystals brings new physical attributes that include the impact of Coulomb blockade or charge confinement, science of formation of nanocrystals of correct size and density and the role of fluctuations, all of which are addressed in this paper using single memory cell and memory array data.


international memory workshop | 2009

16Mb Split Gate Flash Memory with Improved Process Window

Jane A. Yater; Mohammed Suhail; Sung-taeg Kang; J. Shen; Cheong Min Hong; Tushar P. Merchant; Rajesh A. Rao; Horacio P. Gasquet; Konstantin V. Loiko; Brian A. Winstead; S. Williams; M. Rossow; W. Malloch; Ronald J. Syzdek; Gowrishankar L. Chindalore

This paper reports on recent bitcell optimizations that improve drive current and program performance. The 16 Mb and 32 Mb array results are best to-date for nanocrystal memories and suggest a robust, reliable array operation.


Archive | 2007

Silicon Nanocrystal Nonvolatile Memory

Rajesh A. Rao; Michael A. Sadd; R. F. Steimle; C. T. Swift; H. Gasquet; M. Stoker

Silicon nanocrystal memory devices [1],[2] such as shown in Fig. 4.1, offer the potential to solve the challenging problem of scaling nonvolatile memories. Scaling of floating-gate (FG) nonvolatile memory cells has been limited to bottom oxide thicknesses in the range of 80–110 A primarily because of the vulnerability to charge loss from the conducting FG through isolated defects in the tunnel oxide that arise after repeated write/erase operations. As a result the FG, operating voltages are in the range of 16–20 V required for erasing the memory cell by Fowler-Nordheim tunneling of carriers from the FG to the channel. This voltage is sometimes split as ±8 to ±10 V using fully isolated wells. Silicon nanocrystal memory cells that store charge in isolated centers inside a gate dielectric are less susceptible to charge loss through isolated defect paths in the tunnel oxide due to their discontinuous nature of charge storage. In other words, an underlying oxide defect leads to charge loss only from charge storage sites in its immediate proximity. Once the impact of defect-mediated charge loss is mitigated, charge loss is primarily due to tunneling and the tunnel oxide in these devices can be scaled down to about 50–60 A based on retention-time requirements. The scaling of the tunnel oxide results in embedded memory modules that can operate with a maximum on-chip voltage of ±6 V, allowing reduction of the memory module size by up to a factor of 2 at the 90-nm technology node, as shown in Fig. 4.2 [3]. Furthermore, this reduction in operating voltage enables sharing of logic I/O device implants with the high-voltage periphery devices, which are used to charge and discharge the memory bitcells in the array. Open image in new window FIGURE 4.1 Silicon nanocrystal nonvolatile memory bitcell showing the floating silicon nanocrystals used for isolated charge storage. A cross-section transmission electron microscopic image through the gate stack of a bitcell and a plan view scanning electron microscopic image of the nanocrystals is also shown. Open image in new window FIGURE 4.2 Memory module size for both conventional FG nonvolatile memory (NVM) and nanocrystal-based NVM showing the approximate factor-of-2 reduction in memory module size for nanocrystal-based NVM.


Archive | 2004

Method of forming a nanocluster charge storage device

Rajesh A. Rao; Robert F. Steimle; Gowrishankar L. Chindalore


Archive | 2005

Multiple fin formation

Rajesh A. Rao; Leo Mathew


Archive | 2009

METHOD OF FORMING A SPLIT GATE MEMORY DEVICE AND APPARATUS

Brian A. Winstead; Rajesh A. Rao; Spencer E. Williams


Archive | 2002

Method of forming nanocrystals in a memory device

Rajesh A. Rao; Tushar P. Merchant


Archive | 2003

Method of formation of nanocrystals on a semiconductor structure

Rajesh A. Rao; Tushar P. Merchant


Archive | 2005

Method of forming an integrated circuit having nanocluster devices and non-nanocluster devices

Rajesh A. Rao; Robert F. Steimle


Archive | 2007

Split-gate thin film storage NVM cell with reduced load-up/trap-up effects

Brian A. Winstead; Taras A. Kirichenko; Konstantin V. Loiko; Rajesh A. Rao; Sung-taeg Kang; Ko-Min Chang; Jane A. Yater

Collaboration


Dive into the Rajesh A. Rao's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leo Mathew

Freescale Semiconductor

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge