David B. Papworth
Intel
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David B. Papworth.
conference on high performance computing (supercomputing) | 1990
Robert P. Colwell; W. Eric Hall; Chandra S. Joshi; David B. Papworth; Paul Rodman; James E. Tornes
Very-long-instruction-word (VLIW) computers achieve high performance by exploiting the fine-grain parallelism present in sequential or vectorizable code. Multiflows /200 and /300 VLIW systems yielded near-supercomputer performance by this means despite the relatively slow (65 ns) clocks. With its much faster clock period (15 ns) and architectural improvements, the new /500 system attains approximately 4-9* the performance of its predecessors. The authors describe the /500 architecture and implementation (i.e. TRACE/500), with special attention paid to the tradeoffs involved in designing very-high-speed VLIWs.<<ETX>>
Operating Systems Review | 1987
Robert P. Colwell; Robert P. Nix; John O'Donnell; David B. Papworth; Paul K. Rodman
Very Long Instruction Word (VLIW) architectures were promised to deliver far more than the factor of two or three that current architectures achieve from overlapped execution. Using a new type of compiler which compacts ordinary sequential code into long instruction words, a VLIW machine was expected to provide from ten to thirty times the performance of a more conventional machine built of the same implementation technology.Multiflow Computer, Inc., has now built a VLIW called the TRACETM along with its companion Trace SchedulingTM compacting compiler. This new machine has fulfilled the performance promises that were made. Using many fast functional units in parallel, this machine extends some of the basic Reduced-Instruction-Set precepts: the architecture is load/store, the microarchitecture is exposed to the compiler, there is no microcode, and there is almost no hardware devoted to synchronization, arbitration, or interlocking of any kind (the compiler has sole responsibility for runtime resource usage).This paper discusses the design of this machine and presents some initial performance results.
Archive | 1996
Glenn J. Hinton; David B. Papworth; Andrew F. Glew; Michael A. Fetterman; Robert P. Colwell
Archive | 1987
Robert P. Colwell; John O'Donnell; David B. Papworth; Paul Rodman
Archive | 1994
Glenn J. Hinton; Robert W. Martell; Michael A. Fetterman; David B. Papworth; James L. Schwartz
Archive | 1998
Bradley D. Hoyt; Glenn I. Hinton; David B. Papworth; Ashwani Kumar Gupta; Michael A. Fetterman; Subramanian Natarajan; Sunil Shenoy; Reynold V. D'Sa
Archive | 1990
Robert P. Colwell; John O'Donnell; David B. Papworth; Paul Rodman
Archive | 1991
Robert P. Colwell; John O'Donnell; David B. Papworth; Paul Rodman
Archive | 1994
Bradley D. Hoyt; Glenn J. Hinton; David B. Papworth; Ashwani Kumar Gupta; Michael A. Fetterman; Subramanian Natarajan; Sunil Shenoy; Reynold V. D'Sa
international symposium on microarchitecture | 1996
David B. Papworth